The International Software Benchmarking and
Standards Group (ISBSG) database was used to build estimation models for
estimating software functional test effort. The analysis of the data revealed
three test productivity patterns representing economies or diseconomies of
scale and these patterns served as a basis for investigating the
characteristics of the corresponding projects. Three groups of projects related
to the three different productivity patterns, characterized by domain, team
size, elapsed time and rigor of verification and validation carried out during
development, were found to be statistically significant. Within each project
group, the variations in test effort can be explained, in addition to
functional size, by 1) the processes executed during development, and 2) the
processes adopted for testing. Portfolios of estimation models were built using
combinations of the three independent variables. Performance of the estimation models
built using the function point method innovated by the Common Software
Measurement International Consortium (COSMIC) known as COSMIC Function Points,
and the one advocated by the International Function Point Users Group (IFPUG)
known as IFPUG Function Points, were compared to evaluate the impact of these
respective sizing methods on test effort estimation.
Article by Alain
Abran,et al ,from University of Quebec, Canada.
Full access: http://mrw.so/1XH3Rf
评论
发表评论