跳至主要内容

Risk Management in Project Networks: An Information Processing View

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53869#.VNm4LSzQrzE

ABSTRACT
Increasingly, projects are executed by networks of organizations. The networked form of organization has many important implications for project risk management. Information processing theories introduce mechanisms for processing information inside organizations as well as among organizations to reduce the uncertainty and equivocality inherently present in international projects. This study aims to examine the risk management practices involved at a project network level through an empirical analysis of one complex large project network executed in a challenging institutional environment. With regard to network level risk management, the paper identifies eight formal information processing mechanisms for implementing risk management: (1) established rules and criteria for the selection of subcontractors at a global level, (2) specification of responsibilities in the contract, (3) formal risk sheet, (4) progress follow-up tool, (5) database for project information, (6) customer reporting system, (7) updated project plan after the project is delayed, and (8) country study team. Personal relationships between parties, personal commitment, experienced individuals, and face-to-face meetings are identified as informal information processing mechanisms used as measures of project risk management to reduce equivocality. We also elaborate the fitness of the mechanisms used for the contextual situations of the project network settings.
 
Cite this paper
Pekkinen, L. and Aaltonen, K. (2015) Risk Management in Project Networks: An Information Processing View. Technology and Investment, 6, 52-62. doi: 10.4236/ti.2015.61005.
 
References
[1]Chapman, C. and Ward, S. (2003) Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques and Insights. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
 
[2]Miller, R. and Lessard, D. (2000) The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks and Governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
 
[3]Ahola, T. (2009) Efficiency in Project Networks: The Role of Inter-organizational Relationships in Project Implementation. PhD Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo.
 
[4]Cova, B., Ghauri, P. and Salle, R. (2002) Project Marketing: Beyond Competitive Bidding. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
 
[5]Engwall, M. (2003) No Project Is an Island: Linking Projects to History and Context. Research Policy, 32, 789-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4
 
[6]Söderlund, J. (2004) On the Broadening Scope of the Research on Projects: A Review and a Model for Analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 655-667.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.011
 
[7]Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N. and Rothengatter, W. (2003) Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050891
 
[8]Hellgren, B. and Stjernberg, T. (1995) Design and Implementation in Major Investments—A Project Network Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 377-394.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00020-V
 
[9]Morris, P.W.G. and Hough, G.H. (1987) The Anatomy of Major Projects—A Study of the Reality of Project Management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
 
[10]Floricel, S. and Miller, R. (2001) Strategizing for Anticipated Risks and Turbulence in Large-Scale Engineering Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 445-455.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00047-3
 
[11]Pekkinen, L. (2010) Risk Management in Project Network. In: Aramo-Immonen, H., Naaranoja, M. and Toikka, T., Eds., Project Knowledge Sharing Arena, Project Management Association Finland (PMAF) in Collaboration with University Consortium of Pori (UCP) and University of Applied Sciences in Vaasa (VAMK), Espoo, 84-100.
 
[12]Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1986) Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
 
[13]Kähkönen, K. and Artto, K. (2008) Concepts and Processes. In: Kähkönen, K., Artto, K., Karjalainen, J., Martinsuo, M. and Poskela, J., Eds., Management of Uncertainty, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, 8-23.
 
[14]Artto, K. and Kujala, J. (2008) Project Business as a Research Field. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1, 469-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17538370810906219
 
[15]Ward, S. and Chapman, C. (2003) Transforming Project Risk Management into Project Uncertainty Management. International journal of Project Management, 21, 97-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1
 
[16]Perminova, O., Gustafsson, M. and Wikström, K. (2008) Defining Uncertainty in Projects—A New Perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 73-79.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.005
 
[17]Ward, S. and Chapman, C. (2004) Making Risk Management More Effective. In: Morris, P. and Pinto, J., Eds., Wiley Guide to Managing Projects, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 852-875.
 
[18]APM (2006) APM Body of Knowledge. 5th Edition, Association for Project Management, Princes Risborough.
 
[19]PMI (2008) A Guide to the Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK). 4th Edition, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square.
 
[20]Artto, K., Eloranta, K. and Kujala, J. (2008) Subcontractors’ Business Relationships as Risk Sources in Project Networks. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1, 88-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17538370810846432
 
[21]Hallikas, J., Virolainen, V.M. and Tuominen, M. (2002) Risk Analysis and Assessment in Network Environment: A Dyadic Case Study. International Journal of Production Economics, 78, 45-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00098-6
 
[22]Ward, S. (1999) Requirements for an Effective Project Risk Management Process. Project Management Journal, 30, 37-43.
 
[23]Raz, T., Shenhar, A. and Dvir, D. (2002) Risk Management, Project Success, and Technological Uncertainty. R&D Management, 32, 101-109.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00243
 
[24]Cova, B. and Salle, R. (2005) Six Key Points to Merge Project Marketing into Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 354-359.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.006
 
[25]Skaates, M.A. and Tikkanen, H. (2003) International Project Marketing: An Introduction to the INPM Approach. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 503-510.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00021-2
 
[26]Kharbanda, O.P. and Stallworthy, E.A. (1983) How to Learn from Project Disasters: True-Life Stories with a Moral for Management. Gower Publishing Company, Hampshire.
 
[27]Klemetti, A. (2006) Management in Construction Project Network. Helsinki University of Technology, Report 2006/2, Helsinki.
 
[28]Söderholm, A. (2008) Project Management of Unexpected Events. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 80-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.016
 
[29]Galbraith, J. (1973) Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley, Boston.
 
[30]Galbraith, J.R. (1974) Organization Design: An Information Processing View. Interfaces, 4, 28-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.3.28
 
[31]Galbraith, J.R. and Kazanjian, R.K. (1986) Organizing to Implement Strategies of Diversity and Globalization: The Role of Matrix Designs. Human Resource Management, 25, 37-54.
 
[32]Martinez, J.I. and Jarillo, J.C. (1989) The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20, 489-514.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490370
 
[33]Tushman, M. and Nadler, D. (1978) Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 3, 613-624.
 
[34]Prencipe, A. and Tell, F. (2001) Inter-Project Learning: Processes and Outcomes of Knowledge Codification in Project-Based Firms. Research Policy, 30, 1373-1394.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3
 
[35]Hobday, M. (2000) The Project-Based Organisation: An Ideal form for Managing Complex Products and Systems? Research Policy, 29, 871-893.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4
 
[36]DeFillippi, R.J. (2002) Organizational Models for Collaboration in the New Economy. Human Resource Planning, 25, 7-18.
 
[37]Yin, R. (2002) Case Study Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
 
[38]Lehtiranta, L. (2014) Risk Perceptions and Approaches in Multi-Organizations: A Research Review 2000-2012. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 640-653.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.002
 
[39]Tukiainen, S., Aaltonen, K. and Murtonen, M. (2010) Coping with an Unexpected Event: Project Manager’s Contrasting Sensemaking in a Stakeholder Conflict in China. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3, 526-543.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17538371011056129              eww150210lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文