Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53468#.VMX2BizQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53468#.VMX2BizQrzE
ABSTRACT
In
this (very) short essay, I establish these points: All speech is
symbolic; any conduct can be used to communicate a message (i.e.,
symbolically); government’s purpose in regulating, and not a speaker’s
intention to communicate, defines the realm of freedom of expression;
and determining the value of speech has a denominator problem.
Cite this paper
References
Alexander, L. (2015) The Misconceived Search for the Meaning of “Speech” in Freedom of Speech. Open Journal of Philosophy, 5, 39-42. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2015.51005.
[1] | Alexander, L. (1989). Low Value Speech. Northwestern University Law Review, 83, 547-554. |
[2] | Alexander,
L. (2005). Ch. 2: Freedom of Expression and Regulations that Affect
Messages But are Not Enacted for That Reason. In Is There a Right of
Freedom of Expression? (pp. 13-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614668.003 |
[3] | Benjamin, S. M. (2013). Algorithms and Speech. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1445-1494. |
[4] | Calvert, C. (2013). Fringes of Free Expression: Testing the Meaning of “Speech” Amid Shifting Cultural Mores & Changing Technologies. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 22, 545-590. |
[5] | International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 505 U.S. 830 (1992). |
[6] | Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). |
[7] | Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973). |
[8] | Mt. Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977). |
[9] | Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957). |
[10] | Rubenfeld, J. (2001). The First Amendment’s Purpose. Stanford Law Review, 52, 767-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1229492 |
[11] | Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939). |
[12] | United States v. O’Brien, 397 U.S. 367 (1968). |
[13] | Symbolic Expression and the Original Meaning of the First Amendment. The Georgetown Law Journal, 97, 1057-1084. |
[14] | Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598 (1985). |
[15] | Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507 (1948). |
[16] | Wu, T. (2013). Machine Speech. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 1495-1533. |
[17] | Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50 (1976). eww150126lx |
评论
发表评论