跳至主要内容

Max Weber’s Methodology: The Method of Falsification Applied to Text Interpretations

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48652#.VK4Z_snQrzE

Author(s) 

ABSTRACT
Text interpretations are usually leading to ambiguous results. This is especially the case for the interpretation of Max Weber’s methodology. I discuss Thomas Burger’s interpretation that Weber applied Rickert’s methodology and that he never developed his own standpoint regarding the methodological problems. In contrast to this view, I propose an alternative interpretation based on the Methodenstreitin economics and the philosophies of Kant and Rickert. In my opinion Weber offered a very unique solution to an old philosophical problem, which resulted in a complete break with the Platonic and Aristotelian tradition. His solution is what I call the postulate of internal consistency (a logical consistent application of an arbitrary scheme of interpretation). I will use Popper’s method of deductive falsification to decide if Burger’s or my interpretation produces fewer contradictions.
Cite this paper
Etzrodt, C. (2014) Max Weber’s Methodology: The Method of Falsification Applied to Text Interpretations. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 345-359. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43038.
 
References
[1]Antoni, C. (1959). From History to Sociology. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
 
[2]Burger, T. (1976). Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation. Durham: Duke University Press.
 
[3]Fleischmann, E. (1964). De Weber à Nietzsche. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 5, 190-238.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001004
 
[4]Freund, J. (1968). The Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Pantheon Books.
 
[5]Hansen, R. (1968). Der Methodenstreit in den Sozialwissenschaften zwischen Gustav Schmoller und Karl Menger. In A. Diemer (Ed.), Beiträge zur Entwicklung der Wissenschaftstheorie im 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 137-173). Meisenheim: Hain.
 
[6]Hayek, F. A. (1973). The Place of Menger’s Grundsätze in the History of Economic Thought. In J. R. Hicks, & W. Weber (Eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
[7]Hennis, W. (1994). Die volle Nüchternheit des Urteils. In G. Wagner, & H. Zipprian (Eds.), Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 105-145). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
 
[8]Honigsheim, P. (1968). On Max Weber. New York: Free Press.
 
[9]Hume, D. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
 
[10]Menger, C. (1883). Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
 
[11]Menger, C. (1985). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York/ London: New York University Press.
 
[12]Popper, K. R. (1987). Das Elend des Historizismus (6th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[13]Popper. K. R. (1989). Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[14]Rickert, H. (1921a). Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis (4th/5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[15]Rickert, H. (1921b). Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[16]Rickert, H. (1921c). Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft (4th/5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[17]Scaff, L. A. (1984). Weber before Weberian Sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 35, 190-215.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/590232
 
[18]Schluchter, W. (1989). Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford: University of California Press.
 
[19]Tenbruck, F. H. (1959). Die Genesis der Methodologie Max Webers. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 11, 573-630.
 
[20]Turner, S. P., & Factor, R. A. (1984). Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value. London: Routledge.
 
[21]Voegelin, E. (1952). The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
 
[22]von Schelting, A. (1934). Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre: Das logische Problem der historischen Kulturerkenntnis. Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[23]Weber, M. (1975). Max Weber: A Biography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
 
[24]Weber, M. (1984). Max Weber: Ein Lebensbild. Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[25]Weber, M. (1949). Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe: Free Press.
 
[26]Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology (Vol. 1). New York: Bedminster Press.
 
[27]Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[28]Weber, M. (1985). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.
 
[29]Weber, M. (2012). Collected Methodological Writings. London/New York: Routledge.          eww150108lx

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Electron Spin and Proton Spin in the Hydrogen and Hydrogen-Like Atomic Systems

Read full paper at: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52202#.VIj7tMnQrzE Author(s) Stanisław Olszewski * Affiliation(s) Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland . ABSTRACT The mechanical angular momentum and magnetic moment of the electron and proton spin have been calculated semiclassically with the aid of the uncertainty principle for energy and time. The spin effects of both kinds of the elementary particles can be expressed in terms of similar formulae. The quantization of the spin motion has been done on the basis of the old quantum theory. It gives a quantum number n = 1/2 as the index of the spin state acceptable for both the electron and proton ...

A Study on the Seismic Isolation Systems of Bridges with Lead Rubber Bearings

Read full paper at: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52566#.VJt06cCAM4 Author(s)   Woo-Suk Kim , Dong-Joon Ahn , Jong-Kook Lee Affiliation(s) School of Architecture, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, Republic of Korea . ABSTRACT This study consists of the development and presentation of example of seismic isolation system analysis and design for a continuous, 3-span, cast-in-place concrete box girder bridge. It is expected that example is developed for all Lead-Rubber Bearing (LRB) seismic isolation system on piers and abutments which placed in between super-structure and sub-structure. Design forces, displacements, and drifts are given distinctive consideration in...

Effects of Karate Training on Basic Motor Abilities of Primary School Children

“You never attack first in karate” might be the best conclusion of karate, which is a martial art practiced typically without weapons. It’s reported that karate has a long history for several hundred years, but the modern karate was spread to the whole Japan from Okinawa in the early part of 20th century. Now it has become one of the most widely practiced martial art forms in the world. Usually, it’s divided into Kihon, Kata and Kumite. As for the beginners, Kihon is more suitable for them because it involves basic techniques. Due to karate consists of dynamic offensive and defensive techniques using all parts of the body to their maximum advantage, the best understanding of true karate practice is the perfection of oneself through the perfection of the art. It not only develops coordination, quickens reflexes, and builds stamina, but also develops composure, a clearer thought process, deeper insight into one’s mental capabilities, and more self-confidence. So many researchers stu...