Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48652#.VK4Z_snQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48652#.VK4Z_snQrzE
ABSTRACT
Text
interpretations are usually leading to ambiguous results. This is
especially the case for the interpretation of Max Weber’s methodology. I
discuss Thomas Burger’s interpretation that Weber applied Rickert’s
methodology and that he never developed his own standpoint regarding the
methodological problems. In contrast to this view, I propose an
alternative interpretation based on the Methodenstreitin
economics and the philosophies of Kant and Rickert. In my opinion Weber
offered a very unique solution to an old philosophical problem, which
resulted in a complete break with the Platonic and Aristotelian
tradition. His solution is what I call the postulate of internal
consistency (a logical consistent application of an arbitrary scheme of
interpretation). I will use Popper’s method of deductive falsification
to decide if Burger’s or my interpretation produces fewer
contradictions.
KEYWORDS
Max Weber, Methodology, Ideal-Types, Verification, Intuition, Falsification, Postulate of Logical Cosistency
Cite this paper
References
Etzrodt, C. (2014) Max Weber’s Methodology: The Method of Falsification Applied to Text Interpretations. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 345-359. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43038.
| [1] | Antoni, C. (1959). From History to Sociology. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. |
| [2] | Burger, T. (1976). Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation. Durham: Duke University Press. |
| [3] | Fleischmann, E. (1964). De Weber à Nietzsche. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 5, 190-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001004 |
| [4] | Freund, J. (1968). The Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Pantheon Books. |
| [5] | Hansen, R. (1968). Der Methodenstreit in den Sozialwissenschaften zwischen Gustav Schmoller und Karl Menger. In A. Diemer (Ed.), Beiträge zur Entwicklung der Wissenschaftstheorie im 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 137-173). Meisenheim: Hain. |
| [6] | Hayek, F. A. (1973). The Place of Menger’s Grundsätze in the History of Economic Thought. In J. R. Hicks, & W. Weber (Eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [7] | Hennis, W. (1994). Die volle Nüchternheit des Urteils. In G. Wagner, & H. Zipprian (Eds.), Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 105-145). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. |
| [8] | Honigsheim, P. (1968). On Max Weber. New York: Free Press. |
| [9] | Hume, D. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
| [10] | Menger, C. (1883). Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. |
| [11] | Menger, C. (1985). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York/ London: New York University Press. |
| [12] | Popper, K. R. (1987). Das Elend des Historizismus (6th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [13] | Popper. K. R. (1989). Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [14] | Rickert, H. (1921a). Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis (4th/5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [15] | Rickert, H. (1921b). Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [16] | Rickert, H. (1921c). Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft (4th/5th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [17] | Scaff, L. A. (1984). Weber before Weberian Sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 35, 190-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/590232 |
| [18] | Schluchter, W. (1989). Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford: University of California Press. |
| [19] | Tenbruck, F. H. (1959). Die Genesis der Methodologie Max Webers. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 11, 573-630. |
| [20] | Turner, S. P., & Factor, R. A. (1984). Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value. London: Routledge. |
| [21] | Voegelin, E. (1952). The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. |
| [22] | von Schelting, A. (1934). Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre: Das logische Problem der historischen Kulturerkenntnis. Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [23] | Weber, M. (1975). Max Weber: A Biography. New York: John Wiley & Sons. |
| [24] | Weber, M. (1984). Max Weber: Ein Lebensbild. Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [25] | Weber, M. (1949). Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe: Free Press. |
| [26] | Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology (Vol. 1). New York: Bedminster Press. |
| [27] | Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [28] | Weber, M. (1985). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr. |
| [29] | Weber, M. (2012). Collected Methodological Writings. London/New York: Routledge. eww150108lx |
评论
发表评论