跳至主要内容

A New Governance Model for Independent Regulatory Agencies

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53345#.VL3NKCzQrzE

ABSTRACT
In a regulatory state the purpose of intervention by any Independent Regulatory Agency (IRA) is not only regulation in the strict sense but also the supervision of the activity of institutions providing a specific service, particularly the utilities. However, given the evolution of most market economies, namely in transition countries, it is necessary to design new governance arrangements that enable an effective, transparent and truly independent intervention of IRAs. The objectives of this study are a) to analyse of the institutional-design chosen for some independent regulatory agencies and its regulatory framework, namely in northern economies, and b) to suggest the need to strengthen governance arrangements to effectively guarantee regulatory independence, transparency and accountability, therefore promoting a true sunshine regulation in southern economies. The authors conclude that strengthening accountability arrangements is the most important mechanism to avoid regulators capture from the government and regulated organisations. It is also concluded that the way regulators have chosen can also influence the way IRA conducts its activity. Therefore, it is suggested that board accountability can be enhanced by the generalization of the principle of the public contest of regulators.
 
Cite this paper
Nunes, R. , Nunes, S. and Rego, G. (2015) A New Governance Model for Independent Regulatory Agencies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 4-13. doi: 10.4236/tel.2015.51002.
 
References
[1]Boyne, G., Farrell, C., Law, J., Powell, M. and Walker, M. (2003) Evaluating Public Management Reforms. Open University Press, Buckingham.
 
[2]Nunes, R., Rego, G. and Brandao, C. (2010) Public Accountability and Sunshine Healthcare Regulation. Health Care Analysis, 19, 352-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10728-010-0156-6
 
[3]Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation. Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
[4]Baldwin, R. and Cave, M. (1999) Understanding Regulation. Theory, Strategy and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
[5]Aguilera, R., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H. and Jackson, G. (2008) An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities. Organization Science, 19, 475-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
 
[6]Thatcher, M. (2002) Regulation after Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 954-972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046445
 
[7]Thatcher, M. (2002) Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics, 25, 125-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713601588
 
[8]Thatcher, M. (2005) The Third Force? Independent Regulatory Agencies and Elected Politicians in Europe. Governance, 18, 347-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00280.x
 
[9]Dubash, N.K. and Morgan, B. (2013) The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South. Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677160.001.0001
 
[10]Majone, G. (1994) The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics, 17, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031
 
[11]Majone, G. (1997) From the Positive to the Regulatory State. Journal of Public Policy, 17, 139-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524
 
[12]Majone, G. (2010) Regulation and Public Policy. Gestao da Saúde, Gráfica de Coimbra, Coimbra.
 
[13]Crew, M. (1999) Regulation under Increasing Competition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5117-1
 
[14]Walshe, K. (2003) Regulating Healthcare. A Prescription for Improvement? State of Health Series, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
 
[15]Kon, J. (2003) Understanding Regulation and Compliance. Securities Institute Services, London.
 
[16]Gilardi, F. (2004) Institutional Change in Regulatory Policies: Regulation through Independent Agencies and the Three New Institutionalisms. In: Jordana, J. and Levi-Faur, D., Eds., The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (The CRC Series on Competition, Regulation and Development), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, 67-89.
 
[17]Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. (2002) Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. Routledge, London.
 
[18]Selznick, P. (1985) Focusing Organisational Research on Regulation. In: Noll, R., Ed., Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, University of California Press, Berkeley, 363-364.
 
[19]Boatright, J. (2003) Ethics and the Conduct of Business. 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff.
 
[20]Colley, J., Doyle, J., Logan, G. and Stettinius, W. (2003) Corporate Governance: The McGraw-Hill Executive MBA Series. McGraw-Hill, London.
 
[21]Coyle, B. (2003) Corporate Governance, ICSA Professional Development Corporate Governance 2003-2004. ICSA Publishing Ltd., London.
 
[22]Cadbury, A. (2002) Corporate Governance and Chairmanship: A Personal View. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252008.001.0001
 
[23]Mallin, C. (2004) Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
[24]Aguilera, R., Goyer, M. and Kabbach, L.R. (2012) Regulation and Comparative Corporate Governance. In: Wright, M., Siegel, D.S., Keasey, K. and Filatotchev, I., Eds., Handbook of Corporate Governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 23-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446200995.n18
 
[25]Hopt, K. (2011) Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and International Regulation. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 59, 1-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2010.0025
 
[26]Whincop, M. (2001) Bridging the Entrepreneurial Financial Gap: Linking Governance with Regulatory Policy. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Burlington.
 
[27]Goodman, J. and Musgrave, G. (1992) Patient Power: Solving America’s Health Care Crisis. CATO Institute, Washington DC.
 
[28]Federowicz, A. and Aguilera, R. (2003) Corporate Governance in a Changing Economic and Political Environment: Trajectories of Institutional Change. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230286191
 
[29]Sur, S., Lvina, E. and Magnan, M. (2013) Why Do Boards Differ? Because Owners Do: Assessing Ownership Impact on Board Composition. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 373-389.
 
[30]Saltman, R. and Busse, R. (2002) Balancing Regulation and Entrepreneurialism in Europe’s Health Sector: Theory and Practice. In: Saltman, R., Busse, R. and Mossialos, E., Eds., European Observatory on Health Care Systems, Regulating Entrepreneurial Behaviour in European Health Care Systems, Open University Press, Buckingham, 3-52.
 
[31]Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002) Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance. OECD, Paris.
 
[32]Soltani, B. and Maupetit, C. (2013) Importance of Core Values of Ethics, Integrity and Accountability in the European Corporate Governance Codes. Journal of Management & Governance, Published Online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9259-4                                                                     eww150120lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文