跳至主要内容

The Nexus between Infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth in the Mexican Urban Areas

Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52323#.VJDXYcnQrzE

The relationship between infrastructure investment and economic growth is explored for the main urban areas of Mexico during the period 1985-2008. The methodology consists of a production function estimated by means of panel data techniques that include distributed effects in time. The findings highlight that the economic impact from infrastructure investment is effectively spread through time and cannot only be contemporaneous. This result suggests long-run effects. Moreover, the empirical estimates are according to the urban areas’ economic performance: Where major infrastructure provision exists, higher rates of growth are also taking place. Conclusions highlight that if infrastructure provision is not enough it could be a restriction for growth.
Cite this paper
German-Soto, V. and Bustillos, H. (2014) The Nexus between Infrastructure Investment and Economic Growth in the Mexican Urban Areas. Modern Economy, 5, 1208-1220. doi: 10.4236/me.2014.513112
 

[1] Aschauer, D. (1989) Is Public Expenditure Productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0
[2] Aschauer, D. (2000) Public Capital and Economic Growth: Issues of Quantity, Finance, and Efficiency. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 391-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/452464
[3] Hirschman, A. (1973) La estrategia del desarrollo económico. Fondo de Cultura económica, México.
[4] Nijkamp, P. and Ubbels, B. (1999) Infrastructure, Suprastructure and Ecostructure: A Portfolio of Sustainable Growth Potentials. Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappenen Econometric. Research Memorandum, 1999-51, 1-18.
[5] Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2002) Impact of Transport Infrastructure Investment on Regional Development. OECD, Paris.
[6] Chiquiar, D. (2005) Why Mexico’s Regional Income Convergence Broke Down. Journal of Development Economics, 77, 257-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.03.009
[7] Buitrago, R. (2009) Reformas comerciales (apertura) en América Latina: Revisando sus impactos en el crecimiento y el desarrollo. Investigación y Reflexión, 17, 119-131.
[8] Garduño R. and Rafael (2014) La apertura comercial y su efecto en la distribución regional de México. El Trimestre Económico, 81, 413-439.
[9] Calderón Villarreal, C. (2006) Apertura económica, salarios y migración internacional. Análisis Económico, 21, 167-187.
[10] Ocegueda-Hernández, J.M. (2007) Apertura comercial y crecimiento económico en las regiones de México. Investigación Económica, 76, 89-137.
[11] De Hoyos, R. and Lustig, N. (2009) Apertura Comercial, Desigualdad y Pobreza. El Trimestre Económico, 76, 283-328.
[12] Barro, R. (1990) Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261726
[13] Lall, S.V. (2007) Infrastructure and Regional Growth, Growth Dynamics and Policy Relevance for India. Annals of Regional Science, 41, 581-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0112-4
[14] Puga, D. (2002) European Regional Policies in Light of Recent Location Theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 373-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/2.4.373
[15] Nurske, R. (1953) Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
[16] Hirschman, A. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development. Westview Press Inc., Boulder.
[17] Nadiri, I. (1970) International Studies of Factor Inputs and Total Factor Productivity: A Brief Survey. Review of Income and Wealth, 18, 129-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1972.tb00855.x
[18] Sánchez-Robles, B. (1998) Infrastructure Investment and Growth: Some Empirical Evidence. Contemporary Economic Policy, 16, 98-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1998.tb00504.x
[19] Evans, P. and Karras, G. (1994) Is Government Capital Productive? Evidence from a Panel of Seven Countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 16, 271-279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(94)90071-X
[20] Holtz-Eakin, D. and Schwartz, A.E. (1995) Spatial Productivity Spillovers from Public Infrastructure: Evidence from State Highways. NBER Working Paper Series, 2, 459-468.
[21] Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V. and Zou, H.F. (1996) The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 313-344.
[22] Otto, G.D. and Voss, G.M. (1996) Public Capital and Private Production in Australia. Southern Economic Journal, 62, 723-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060890
[23] Zhang, X. (2008) Transport Infrastructure, Spatial Spillover and Economic Growth: Evidence from China. Frontiers of Economics in China, 3, 585-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11459-008-0029-1
[24] Mizutani, F. and Tanaka, T. (2010) Productivity Effects and Determinants of Public Infrastructure Investment. Annals of Regional Science, 44, 493-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0279-y
[25] Pereira, A.M. and Andraz, J.M. (2012) On the Regional Incidence of Highway Investments in the USA. Annals of Regional Science, 48, 819-838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0409-1
[26] Herrerías, M.J. and Orts, V. (2012) Equipment Investment, Output and Productivity in China. Empirical Economics, 42, 181-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0418-z
[27] Feltenstein, A. and Ha, J. (1995) The Role of Infrastructure in Mexican Economic Reform. World Bank Economic Review, 9, 287-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wber/9.2.287
[28] Fuentes, N.A. (2003) Crecimiento económico y desigualdades regionales en México: El impacto de la infraestructura. Región y Sociedad, 15, 81-103.
[29] Fuentes, N.A. and Mendoza Cota, J.E. (2003) Infraestructura pública y convergencia regional en México, 1980-1998. Comercio Exterior, 53, 178-187.
[30] Noriega, A. and Fontela, M. (2007) La infraestructura y el crecimiento económico en México. El Trimestre Económico, 74, 885-900.
[31] Lächler, U. and Aschauer, D. (1998) Public Investment and Economic Growth in Mexico. The World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper No. 1964, 17-18.
[32] Holtz-Eakin, D. (1994) Public-Sector Capital and the Productivity Puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 12-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2109822
[33] Chambers, R.G. (1988) Applied Production Analysis. A Dual Approach. Cambridge University Press, New York.
[34] Greene, W.H. (2008) Econometric Analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
[35] Greene, W.H. (1999) Análisis econométrico. Prentice Hall, Madrid.
[36] INEGI (2010) Estadísticas históricas de México, tomos I y II. INEGI, Aguascalientes.
[37] Barro, R. and Lee, J.W. (1993) International Comparisons of Educational Attainment. NBER Working Paper Series, 1-47.
[38] Díaz-Bautista, A. (2000) Convergence and Economic Growth in Mexico. Frontera Norte, 13, 85-110.
[39] Ocegueda-Hernández, J.M. and Plascencia López, G. (2004) Crecimiento económico en la región fronteriza de México y Estados Unidos: Una contrastación empírica de la hipótesis de convergencia. Frontera Norte, 16, 7-31.
[40] Mayer-Foulkes, D. (2007) Fallas de mercado en capital humano. La trampa intergeneracional de la pobreza en México. El Trimestre Económico, 74, 543-614.
[41] Biehl, D. (1988) Las infraestructuras y el desarrollo regional. Papeles de Economía Española, 35, 293-310.                             eww141217lx
[42] Gujarati, D.N. and Porter, D.C. (2010) Econometría. McGraw-Hill, México.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...