Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52316
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52316
Author(s)
The STEM movement encourages girls to consider
careers in science; however, for success, common misconceptions and
biases need to be dispelled, while females’ spatial thinking skills are
developed. All students, both girls and boys, need exposure to the
accomplishments of women scientists to appreciate their contributions
and to envision females as successful scientists. This one-week study
conducted during a summer day camp examined upper elementary student (n =
15; 7 females, 8 males) attitudes toward science, women in science, and
the possibility of a science career before and after participation in
learning about diverse accomplished women scientists and making a
diorama showcasing the professional work and caring actions of one of
the scientists. The efficacy of this project for upper elementary
students, conducted during a summer day camp, is supported by
pretest-posttest data and attitude surveys. The five-day class showed
positive changes in student plans for a career in science and improved
attitudes toward the importance of females becoming scientists.
Directions for constructing dioramas, examples of student-made work, and
creative scenes made with given craft items are provided.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Teske, J. , Gray, P. , Klein, J. and Rule, A.
(2014) Making Dioramas of Women Scientists Help Elementary Students
Recognize Their Contributions. Creative Education, 5, 1984-2002. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.523223.
| [1] | Achieve Inc. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Washington DC: Achieve Inc. |
| [2] | American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| [3] |
Archer, L., DeWitt, J. Osborne,
J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). “Balancing Acts”:
Elementary School Girls' Negotiations of Femininity, Achievement, and
Science. Science Education, 96, 967-989.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.21031 |
| [4] |
Au, W. (2007). High-Stakes
Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Educational
Researcher, 36, 258-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523 |
| [5] |
Bergen, D., & Pronin
Fromberg, D. (2009). Play and Social Interaction in Middle Childhood.
Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 426-430.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000610 |
| [6] |
Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B.
T. (2005). Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor
Gender on Female Students. American Economic Review, 92, 152-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670149 |
| [7] |
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E.
L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The Role of
Efficacy and Identity in Science Career Commitment among
Underrepresented Minority Students. Journal of Social Issues, 67,
469-491.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x |
| [8] |
Common Core State Standards
Initiative (2012). Implementing the Common Core State Standards.
http://www.corestandards.org/ |
| [9] |
Correll, S. J. (2004).
Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career
Aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900106 |
| [10] | Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper & Row. |
| [11] | Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial. |
| [12] | Di Fabio, N. M., Brandi, C., & Frehill, L. M. (2008). Professional Women and Minorities: A Total Human Resources Data Compendium. Washington DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. |
| [13] | Downs, R., & De Souza, A. (2006). Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. Washington DC: Committee on the Support for the Thinking Spatially, National Research Council. The National Academies Press. |
| [14] | Dweck, C. (2006). Is Math a Gift? Beliefs That Put Females at Risk. In S. J. Ceci, & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence (pp. 47-55). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. |
| [15] | Dweck, C. (2008). Mindsets and Math/Science Achievement. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York, Institute for Advanced Study, Commission on Mathematics and Science Education. |
| [16] |
Fouad, N. A., Hackett, G.,
Smith, P. L., Kantamneni, N., Fitzpatrick, M., Haag, S., & Spencer,
D. (2010). Barriers and Supports for Continuing in Mathematics and
Science: Gender and Educational Level Differences. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 77, 361-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.004 |
| [17] |
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S.,
Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for Success: Reactions
to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 89, 416-427.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 |
| [18] |
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto,
T. G. (2007). Why Are Women Penalized for Success at Male Tasks? The
Implied Communality Deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81 |
| [19] | Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering and Technology. Watertown, MA: Harvard Business School. |
| [20] | Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington DC: American Association of University Women. |
| [21] |
Iowa Department of Education (2013). Iowa Core 21st Century Skills.
www.educateiowa.gov/documents/iowa-core/2013/04/iowa-core-21st-century-skills-doc |
| [22] | Johnson, K. V., & Watson, E. D. (2005). A Historical Chronology of the Plight of African Americans Gaining Recognition in Engineering and Technology. Journal of Technology Studies, 31, 81-93. |
| [23] |
Klopp, T. J., Rule, A. C.,
Schneider, J. S., & Boody, R. M. (2014). Computer
Technology-Integrated Projects Should Not Supplant Craft Projects in
Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, 36,
865-886.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.829927 |
| [24] |
Leaper, C. L., & Brown, C.
S. (2008). Perceived Experiences with Sexism among Adolescent Girls.
Child Development, 79, 685-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01151.x |
| [25] |
Lightbody, P., & Durndell,
A. (1996). The Masculine Image of Careers in Science and Technology—Fact
or Fantasy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 231-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01192.x |
| [26] |
Lightbody, P., Siann, G. Stocks,
R., & Walsh, D. (1996). Motivation and Attribution at Secondary
School: The Role of Gender. Educational Studies, 22, 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305569960220102 |
| [27] |
Mead, M., & Métraux, R.
(1957). Image of the Scientist among High-School Students. Science, 126,
384-390.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.126.3270.384 |
| [28] |
Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S.,
& Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender Differences in High-School Students’
Views about Science. International Journal of Science Education, 28,
363-381.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277664 |
| [29] |
Moyer, M. W. (2014). The Serious
Need for Play: Free, Imaginative Play Is Crucial for Normal Social,
Emotional, and Cognitive Development. It Makes Us Better Adjusted,
Smarter, and Less Stressed. Scientific American Mind, 23, 78-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamericancreativity1213-78 |
| [30] | Munro, M., & Elsom, D. (2000). Choosing Science at 16: The Influences of Science Teachers and Careers Advisors on Students’ Decisions about Science Subjects and Science and Technology Careers. Cambridge: National Institute for Careers Education and Counseling. |
| [31] | National Science Foundation (2008). Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966-2006. Arlington, VA: Division of Science Resources Statistics. |
| [32] |
National Science Foundation
(2009). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and
Engineering. Arlington, VA: Division of Science Resources Statistics. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd |
| [33] | Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting Implicit Group Attitudes and Beliefs from a Demonstration Web Site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101-115. |
| [34] |
Perna, L., Lundy-Wagner, V.,
Drezner, N. D., Gasman, M., Yoon, S., Bose, E., & Gary, S. (2009).
The Contribution of HBCUs to the Preparation of African American Women
for STEM Careers: A Case Study. Research in Higher Education, 50, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9110-y |
| [35] | The Research Business (1994). Views of Science among Students, Teachers and Parents. Institution of Electrical Engineers. |
| [36] | Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. M. (2013). The Art and Craft of Science: Scientific Discovery and Innovation Can Depend on Engaging More Students in the Arts. Educational Leadership, 70, 16-21. |
| [37] | Shettle, C., Roey, S., Mordica, J., Perkins, R., Nord, C., Teodorovic, J., Lyons, M., Averett, C., Kastberg, D., & Brown, J. (2007). The Nation’s Report Card [TM]: America’s High School Graduates. National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2007-467, Washington DC: US Department of Education. |
| [38] | Simard, C., Henderson, A. D., Gilmartin, S. K., Schiebinger, L., & Whitney, T. (2008). Climbing the Technical Ladder: Obstacles and Solutions for Mid-Level Women in Technology. Stanford, CA: Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University, and Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology. |
| [39] | Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (2006). Fantasy and Imagination. In D. P. Fromberg, & D. Bergen (Eds.), Play from Birth to 12: Contexts, Perspectives, and Meanings (pp. 371-378). New York: Routledge. |
| [40] |
Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational
Research in Developing 3-D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students.
International Journal of Science Education, 31, 459-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595839 |
| [41] |
Sorby, S. A., & Baartmans,
B. J. (2000). The Development and Assessment of a Course for Enhancing
the 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students.
Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 301-307.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00529.x |
| [42] |
Spohn, C. (2008). Teacher
Perspectives on No Child Left Behind and Arts Education: A Case Study.
Arts Education Policy Review, 109, 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.3-12 |
| [43] |
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., &
Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities:
A Meta-Analysis and Consideration of Critical Variables. Psychological
Bulletin, 117, 250-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250 eww141217lx |
评论
发表评论