Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48989#.VJd9DcCAM4
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48989#.VJd9DcCAM4
Author(s)
This paper
cautiously affirms history as real, in three stages: we begin, 1) by briefly
reviewing the historical swings between the objective view of history and the
relative view of history, followed by, 2) our careful inquiry into how history
is composed by “I”, “here”, and “now” spontaneously spreading in time, and
finally, 3) in the light of this consideration we argue for our cautious answer, “history is real”, as 4), we define “caution”
and “real”.
Cite this paper
Tang, R. (2014) Is History Real? A Cautious Answer. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 439-444. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43048. eww141222lx
| [1] | Novick, P. (1998). That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
评论
发表评论