Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52474#.VJoNEcCAM4
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52474#.VJoNEcCAM4
Author(s)
While students commonly assume the identity of being
key stakeholders of higher education, the present article explores the
possible complications stemmed from such key identity. Stakeholder
theory has its strengths attributed by its conceptual breath and
versatility; the limits of the theory arise for the same merit. Making
reference to the theory with no restrains leads reasonably to the
conclusion that the educational institute is unwilling to take measure
closely to the long term effect, tangible or intangible, of such
approach. Providing multiple perspectives on the identity of students
are observed, an enrichment of stakeholder theory catering student
identity is necessary.
Cite this paper
Lau, J. (2014) Enriching Stakeholder Theory: Student Identity of Higher Education. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4, 762-766. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2014.412082.
| [1] | Borkowski, S.C. and Ugras, Y.J. (1992) The Ethical Attitudes of Students as a Function of Age, Sex and Experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 961-979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00871962 |
| [2] | Freeman, R. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Ballinger, Boston. |
| [3] | Rowley, T.J. (1997) Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 206-221. |
| [4] | Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91. |
| [5] | Key, S. (1999) Toward a New Theory of the Firm: A Critique of Stakeholder “Theory”. Management Decision, 37, 317-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749910269366 |
| [6] |
Fassin, Y. (2008) Imperfections
and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation.
Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 879-888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9474-5 |
| [7] | Seeman, E.D. and O’Hara, M. (2006) Customer Relationship Management in Higher Education: Using Information Systems to Improve the Student-School Relationship. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 23, 24-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650740610639714 |
| [8] | Singh, G. (2002) Educational Consumers or Educational Partners: A Critical Theory Analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 681-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2002.0552 |
| [9] | Sperlich, A. and Spraul, K. (2007) Students as Active Partners: Higher Education Management in Germany. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12, Article 11. |
| [10] | Hill, F.M. (1995) Managing Service Quality in Higher Education: The Identity of the Student as Primary Consumer. Quality Assurance in Education, 3, 10-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684889510093497 |
| [11] | Tasie, G.O. (2010) Analytical Observations of the Applicability of the Concept of Student-as-Customer in a University Setting. Educational Research and Reviews, 5, 309-313 |
| [12] |
Voss, R., Gruber, T. and
Szmigin, I. (2007) Service Quality in Higher Education: The Identity of
Student Expectations. Journal of Business Research, 60, 949-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.020 eww141224lx |
评论
发表评论