Towards an Ethics of Technology: Re-Exploring Teilhard de Chardin’s Theory of Technology and Evolution
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51174#.VFgt0WfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51174#.VFgt0WfHRK0
Author(s)
Defining the mechanism of evolution is a
controversial issue that, until now, divides the scientific community.
Some have argued in the strictest Darwinian terms that evolution’s
primary mechanism is necessity—“survival of the fittest”. Other
evolutionists followed in the footsteps of Jacques Monod, the French
biologist, who argued for a mixture of random chance and necessity.
Teilhard de Chardin, it is widely believed, took Monod one step further
by asserting that evolution is the fundamental motion of the entire
universe, an ascent along a privileged and necessary pathway toward
consciousness—thus, evolution was guided chance and necessity. However,
if evolution is being guided, what is doing the guiding? And where,
ultimately, is it going? His bold answers brought Teilhard to the heart
of a widely perceived scientific, as well as religious, heresy. A heresy
that was effectively silenced, and soon would re-emerge as the world
began witnessing exponential advancements in Science and Technology
(specifically, on computing, nano-technology, robotics and genetic
engineering). Almost half a century after the publication of
Phenomenology of Man, many futurist thinkers have began noticing that
the super-fast acceleration in the passage of time for evolution is
moving in a very different direction than that for the Universe from
which it emerges. This paper puts forward the thesis that the
philosophical underpinning of a “human-sponsored variant of evolution”
(i.e. evolution towards convergence of biological and non-biological
intelligence) finds support and meaning within Teilhard de Chardin’s
theory of evolution (i.e. evolution towards consciousness). It
specifically covers 1) the implications of advancing technologies in
human evolution and consciousness within the context of Teilhard’s
theory of evolution; 2) how, after homo sapiens silently emerged around
500,000 years ago (with larger brains, particularly in the area of the
highly convoluted cortex responsible for rational thought), and after
they develop computing, the story of evolution has progressed
exponentially paving the way for the possibility of turning Teilhard’s
controversial ideas (such as the Noosphere) more than a poetic image;
and 3) how the grandest creations of evolution—consciousness and
intelligence—provide for the very tool that may allow homo sapiens to
take over the course and direction of their own evolution—without
necessarily shedding their desire to search for spiritual truth in a
secular universe.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Articulo, A. (2014) Towards an Ethics of
Technology: Re-Exploring Teilhard de Chardin’s Theory of Technology and
Evolution. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 518-530. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.44054.
| [1] |
BBC NEWS. Wheelchair Steered by Brainpower. Published: 2003/07/24 10:04:06 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3089559.stm |
| [2] |
Brin, D. (2006). Singularities
and Nightmare in Nanotechnology Perceptions: A Review of Ultraprecision
Engineering and Nanotechnology, Volume 2, No. 1. http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0656.html |
| [3] | Clarke, A. (1999). 2001: A Space Odyssey. New York: New American Library. |
| [4] | Clarke, A. (1953). Childhood’s End. New York: Random House Publishing Group. |
| [5] | Clarke, A. (2001). Fountain of Paradise. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd. |
| [6] |
CNN Science Report, February 3, 2006. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/03/ltm.03.html |
| [7] |
CNN’s Special Report, Dated
March 2, 2006, Brain Chip Research Aims for Future Movement at
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/02/22/brain.gate/index.html |
| [8] |
Constans, A. Mind over Machines:
Brain-Machine Interfaces Help Locked-In Patients Communicate and
Quadriplegics Control Their World. http://www.bioethics.upenn.edu/nubc/speakers/surgenor_mindovermachine.pdf |
| [9] | de Chardin, T. (1959). The Future of Mankind. New York: Harper & Row Publishers. |
| [10] | de Chardin, T. (1975). The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 243. |
| [11] |
Fukuyama, F. (2002) Transhumanism. in Foreign Policy September-October 2004.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2667 |
| [12] | Fukuyama, F. (2002). Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Pan Books Limited. |
| [13] |
Joy, B. (2002). Why The Future Does Not Need Us. Wired Magazine, Issue 8.04.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/ |
| [14] | Kurzweil, R. (1999). The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Machine Intelligence Exceeds Human Intelligence. London: Penguin Book, Ltd., 8. |
| [15] |
Martin, R. (2005). Mind Control. WIRED Magazine. Issue 13.03, March 2005.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.03/ |
| [16] | Moravec, H. (1988). Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
| [17] | Moscovitch, M., Thomspon, E., & Zelato, P. D. (2007). Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [18] |
Pfurtscheller, G., Flotzinger,
D., Mohl, W., & Peltoranta, M. (1992). Prediction of the Side of
Hand Movements from Single Trial Multi-Channel EEG Data Using Neural
Networks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82,
313-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90112-U |
| [19] |
Thomson, E. A. (2014). Monkey
Controls Robotic Arm Using Brain Signals Sent over Internet.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2000/monkeys-1206.html |
| [20] | Toffler, A. (1972). Future Shock. New York: Bantam Books. |
| [21] | Toffler, A. (1980). Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books. |
| [22] |
Twist, J. (2004). Brain Waves Control Video Game. BBC News Online Technology Reporter.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3485918.stm |
| [23] |
Wolpaw, J. R., & McFarland,
D. J. (2004). Control of a Two-Dimensional Movement Signal by a
Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interface in Humans. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101,
17849-17854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403504101 |
| [24] |
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N.,
McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002).
Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. Clinical
Neurophysiology, 113, 767-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3 |
| [25] | Wu, W., et al. (2002). Neural Decoding of Cursor Motion Using a Kalman Filter. NIPS: 117-124. eww141104lx |
评论
发表评论