跳至主要内容

A Retrospective Observational Analysis of Clinical Outcomes before and after the Publication of the AACE/ACE Guidelines

Read bull paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=47482#.VFm6g2fHRK0

Background: The influence of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) guidelines (hereafter, “guidelines”) on clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes is yet to be assessed. Objectives: To determine if differences occurred in type of: 1) medication class prescribed; 2) therapy by A1c strata in type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients before and after guidelines were published (December 2009). Methods: Data for this retrospective cohort study were extracted from community health center clinics’ electronic medical records for patients who: 1) were adults (18 - 80 years) with T2DM; and 2) had at least one A1c value before and after guidelines. Demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes [oral anti-diabetic (OAD) medication class, therapy type (mono, dual, triple), and A1c values] were collected. A1c was stratified into four levels: <6.5; 6.5 - 7.5; 7.6 - 9.0; >9.0. Descriptive and inferential statis-tics were used. Results: The random sample of 302 patients was 55.4 ± 11.7 years of age, primarily female (65.9%) and Hispanic (68.8%). Regarding medication class, most (68.5% before and 72.2% after guidelines) patients were prescribed metformin. The proportion of patients across individual medication classes increased significantly (p < 0.05) between the periods before and after guidelines, with the greatest percentage increase observed with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (36.2%). Chi-square results revealed a significant difference (p < 0.0001) between type of therapy and A1c strata. Before guidelines, 55.7% of patients with A1c values < 6.5% were on monotherapy, while 44.1% of patients with A1c values > 9% were on dual therapy. After guidelines, 48.4% of patients with A1c values < 6.5% were on monotherapy, while 31.8% of patients with A1c values > 9% were on dual therapy. Almost one-half (48.3%) of patients remained in the same A1c strata before and after guidelines were published and there were no significant changes in mean A1c. Conclusions: DPP-4 inhibitor use showed the largest increase after guidelines were issued, however, there were no improvements in A1c. Additional research is warranted to evaluate healthcare providers’ adherence to AACE/ACE guidelines and how this influences patients’ health outcomes.
Cite this paper
Peddaiahgari, R. , Adeyemi, A. , Barner, J. , Lopez, D. and Jokerst, J. (2014) A Retrospective Observational Analysis of Clinical Outcomes before and after the Publication of the AACE/ACE Guidelines. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 5, 717-723. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.512098
 

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.
[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Diabetes: Successes and Opportunities for Population-Based Prevention and Control.
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/aag/pdf/diabetes.pdf
[3] Brown, J.B., Harris, S.B., Webster-Bogaert, S., Wetmore, S., Faulds, C. and Stewart, M. (2002) The Role of Patient, Physician and Systemic Factors in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Family Practice, 19, 344-349.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.4.344
[4] Nathan, D.M., Buse, J.B., Davidson, M.B., et al. (2009) Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy: A Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 32, 193-203.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-9025
[5] American Diabetes Association (2009) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009. Diabetes Care, 32, S13-S61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-S013
[6] Rodbard, H.W., Jellinger, P.S., Davidson, J.A., et al. (2009) Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Consensus Panel on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Algorithm for Glycemic Control. Endocrine Practice, 15, 540-559.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4158/EP.15.6.540
[7] The Management of Diabetes Mellitus Working Group (1999) VHA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Diabetes in the Primary Care Setting.
http://www.va.gov/diabetes/docs/Clinical_Practice_Guidelines.doc
[8] International Diabetes Federation CGT (2005) Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes.
http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/IDF%20GGT2D.pdf
[9] Liday, C. (2011) Overview of the Guidelines and Evidence for the Pharmacologic Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Pharmacotherapy, 31, 37S-43S.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.31.12.37S
[10] Levetan, C. (2007) Oral Antidiabetic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 23, 945-952.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/030079907X178766
[11] Cohen, A. and Horton, E.S. (2007) Progress in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: New Pharmacologic Approaches to Improve Glycemic Control. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 23, 905-917.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/030079907X182068
[12] Larme, A.C. and Pugh, J.A. (2001) Evidence-Based Guidelines Meet the Real World: The Case of Diabetes Care. Diabetes Care, 24, 1728-1733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.10.1728
[13] Grant, R.W., Wexler, D.J., Watson, A.J., et al. (2007) How Doctors Choose Medications to Treat Type 2 Diabetes: A National Survey of Specialists and Academic Generalists. Diabetes Care, 30, 1448-1453.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2499
[14] Francke, A.L., Smit, M.C., de Veer, A.J. and Mistiaen, P. (2008) Factors Influencing the Implementation of Clinical Guidelines for Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Meta-Review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 8, 38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-38
[15] Cabana, M.D., Rand, C.S., Powe, N.R., et al. (1999) Why Don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? A Framework for Improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1458-1465.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458
[16] Derosa, G. and Maffioli, P. (2012) Glp-1 Agonists Exenatide and Liraglutide: A Review about their Safety and Efficacy. Current Clinical Pharmacology, 7, 214-228.                                               eww141105lx

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Electron Spin and Proton Spin in the Hydrogen and Hydrogen-Like Atomic Systems

Read full paper at: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52202#.VIj7tMnQrzE Author(s) Stanisław Olszewski * Affiliation(s) Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland . ABSTRACT The mechanical angular momentum and magnetic moment of the electron and proton spin have been calculated semiclassically with the aid of the uncertainty principle for energy and time. The spin effects of both kinds of the elementary particles can be expressed in terms of similar formulae. The quantization of the spin motion has been done on the basis of the old quantum theory. It gives a quantum number n = 1/2 as the index of the spin state acceptable for both the electron and proton ...

Effects of Karate Training on Basic Motor Abilities of Primary School Children

“You never attack first in karate” might be the best conclusion of karate, which is a martial art practiced typically without weapons. It’s reported that karate has a long history for several hundred years, but the modern karate was spread to the whole Japan from Okinawa in the early part of 20th century. Now it has become one of the most widely practiced martial art forms in the world. Usually, it’s divided into Kihon, Kata and Kumite. As for the beginners, Kihon is more suitable for them because it involves basic techniques. Due to karate consists of dynamic offensive and defensive techniques using all parts of the body to their maximum advantage, the best understanding of true karate practice is the perfection of oneself through the perfection of the art. It not only develops coordination, quickens reflexes, and builds stamina, but also develops composure, a clearer thought process, deeper insight into one’s mental capabilities, and more self-confidence. So many researchers stu...

Fermented Brown Sugar Residue Prolongs the Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan via DAF-16

Fermented brown sugar residue (FBSR) is generated in the course of purifying biomass ethanol from the yeast fermentation products of brown sugar. It contains abundant nutrition and is used in various industrial applications including as fertilizer and feed. Meanwhile, brown sugar has attracted attention as a health food and is thought to prevent cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and brain stem diseases. Furthermore, polyphenol, contained in brown sugar, reduces oxidative stress and inhibits glucose absorption. DAF-16 is a transcription factor regulated downstream of the insulin signaling pathway and is one of the main factors contributing to aging and lifespan in C. elegans . Therefore, to determine the precise roles of the DAF-16 transcription factor in stress tolerance and life span, it is necessary to elucidate the signaling pathways involved in DAF-16 activation. This study was designed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms controlling the physiological stress toleran...