A Retrospective Observational Analysis of Clinical Outcomes before and after the Publication of the AACE/ACE Guidelines
Read bull paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=47482#.VFm6g2fHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=47482#.VFm6g2fHRK0
Background: The
influence of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American
College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) guidelines (hereafter, “guidelines”) on
clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes is yet to be assessed. Objectives:
To determine if differences occurred in type of: 1) medication class
prescribed; 2) therapy by A1c strata in type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients
before and after guidelines were published (December 2009). Methods: Data for
this retrospective cohort study were extracted from community health center
clinics’ electronic medical records for patients who: 1) were adults (18 - 80
years) with T2DM; and 2) had at least one A1c value before and after
guidelines. Demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes [oral anti-diabetic
(OAD) medication class, therapy type (mono, dual, triple), and A1c values] were
collected. A1c was stratified into four levels: <6.5; 6.5 - 7.5; 7.6 - 9.0;
>9.0. Descriptive and inferential statis-tics were used. Results: The
random sample of 302 patients was 55.4 ± 11.7 years of age, primarily female
(65.9%) and Hispanic (68.8%). Regarding medication class, most (68.5% before
and 72.2% after guidelines) patients were prescribed metformin. The proportion
of patients across individual medication classes increased significantly (p <
0.05) between the periods before and after guidelines, with the greatest
percentage increase observed with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors
(36.2%). Chi-square results revealed a significant difference (p < 0.0001)
between type of therapy and A1c strata. Before guidelines, 55.7% of patients
with A1c values < 6.5% were on monotherapy, while 44.1% of patients with A1c
values > 9% were on dual therapy. After guidelines, 48.4% of patients with
A1c values < 6.5% were on monotherapy, while 31.8% of patients with A1c
values > 9% were on dual therapy. Almost one-half (48.3%) of patients
remained in the same A1c strata before and after guidelines were published and
there were no significant changes in mean A1c. Conclusions: DPP-4 inhibitor use
showed the largest increase after guidelines were issued, however, there were
no improvements in A1c. Additional research is warranted to evaluate
healthcare providers’ adherence to AACE/ACE guidelines and how this influences
patients’ health outcomes.
Cite this paper
Peddaiahgari, R. , Adeyemi, A. , Barner, J. , Lopez,
D. and Jokerst, J. (2014) A Retrospective Observational Analysis of
Clinical Outcomes before and after the Publication of the AACE/ACE
Guidelines. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 5, 717-723. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.512098.
| [1] | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. |
| [2] |
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (2010) Diabetes: Successes and Opportunities for
Population-Based Prevention and Control. http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/aag/pdf/diabetes.pdf |
| [3] |
Brown, J.B., Harris, S.B.,
Webster-Bogaert, S., Wetmore, S., Faulds, C. and Stewart, M. (2002) The
Role of Patient, Physician and Systemic Factors in the Management of
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Family Practice, 19, 344-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.4.344 |
| [4] |
Nathan, D.M., Buse, J.B.,
Davidson, M.B., et al. (2009) Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in
Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment
of Therapy: A Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association
and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care,
32, 193-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc08-9025 |
| [5] |
American Diabetes Association
(2009) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009. Diabetes Care, 32,
S13-S61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-S013 |
| [6] |
Rodbard, H.W., Jellinger, P.S.,
Davidson, J.A., et al. (2009) Statement by an American Association of
Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Consensus
Panel on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Algorithm for Glycemic Control.
Endocrine Practice, 15, 540-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.4158/EP.15.6.540 |
| [7] |
The Management of Diabetes
Mellitus Working Group (1999) VHA/DOD Clinical Practice Guideline for
the Management of Diabetes in the Primary Care Setting. http://www.va.gov/diabetes/docs/Clinical_Practice_Guidelines.doc |
| [8] |
International Diabetes Federation CGT (2005) Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes. http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/IDF%20GGT2D.pdf |
| [9] |
Liday, C. (2011) Overview of the
Guidelines and Evidence for the Pharmacologic Management of Type 2
Diabetes Mellitus. Pharmacotherapy, 31, 37S-43S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.31.12.37S |
| [10] |
Levetan, C. (2007) Oral
Antidiabetic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes. Current Medical Research and
Opinion, 23, 945-952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/030079907X178766 |
| [11] |
Cohen, A. and Horton, E.S.
(2007) Progress in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: New Pharmacologic
Approaches to Improve Glycemic Control. Current Medical Research and
Opinion, 23, 905-917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/030079907X182068 |
| [12] |
Larme, A.C. and Pugh, J.A.
(2001) Evidence-Based Guidelines Meet the Real World: The Case of
Diabetes Care. Diabetes Care, 24, 1728-1733. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.10.1728 |
| [13] |
Grant, R.W., Wexler, D.J.,
Watson, A.J., et al. (2007) How Doctors Choose Medications to Treat Type
2 Diabetes: A National Survey of Specialists and Academic Generalists.
Diabetes Care, 30, 1448-1453. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2499 |
| [14] |
Francke, A.L., Smit, M.C., de
Veer, A.J. and Mistiaen, P. (2008) Factors Influencing the
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines for Health Care Professionals: A
Systematic Meta-Review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 8,
38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-8-38 |
| [15] |
Cabana, M.D., Rand, C.S., Powe,
N.R., et al. (1999) Why Don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice
Guidelines? A Framework for Improvement. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 282, 1458-1465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 |
| [16] | Derosa, G. and Maffioli, P. (2012) Glp-1 Agonists Exenatide and Liraglutide: A Review about their Safety and Efficacy. Current Clinical Pharmacology, 7, 214-228. eww141105lx |
评论
发表评论