Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50789#.VE8SKFfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50789#.VE8SKFfHRK0
Author(s)
1Department of Didactics, Program of Postgraduate on Education, Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences,
University Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho”—UNESP/Marília, São Paulo, Brazil.
2Department of Didactics, Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences, University Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho”—UNESP/Marília, São Paulo, Brazil.
2Department of Didactics, Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences, University Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho”—UNESP/Marília, São Paulo, Brazil.
This text is mainly aimed to address essential
aspects of teacher formation in the light of education-work relations in
the higher education, from our systematic experience in higher
education teaching, particularly teaching and research in the field of
Didactics discipline. This formulation is justified considering our
concern in seeking to situate this discussion in the context of bringing
together knowledge areas and the field of teaching knowledge. Still,
our choice to develop such an approach in the light of work-education
relationship is due to the belief about the possibilities of seeking to
overcome the requirements imposed by capitalism to our educational
system, within the possible contradictions of these relationships. In
this context the teachers’ formation in higher education gains social
and strategic importance, taking on the task of forming individuals of
“action-reflection-action” in a society established historically based
on the social relations which settle in the light of capital’s multiple
determinations. It appears that, in this sense, the major confrontations
have been given within the discussions about what to prioritize or
combine in the list of criteria and content for teacher’s formation. In
Didactic, we seek to emphasize discussions that we consider with a
philosophical background, referring to the orientation of teaching
practice in knowledge of contemporary ideological struggle;
socio-historical, referring to the possibility of formation of
disciplines, among them Didactic, and curriculums and references to
support its guidance in the process of teacher’s formation. This context
of discussion is based on the concrete teaching practice with a view to
transformation and to search for new syntheses in terms of knowledge
and in terms of historical reality. Then therefore, our methodological
approach grounded in the dimensions of the same unit: historical
materialism as posture, method and as praxis.
Cite this paper
de Castro, R. and da Silva, V. (2014) Teachers’
Formation in Higher Education: Some Aspects under the Light of
Education-Work Relations. Creative Education, 5, 1684-1689. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.518187.
| [1] | Frigotto, G. (2006). O enfoque da dialética materialista histórica na pesquisa educacional. In I. Fazenda (Org.), Metodologia da pesquisa educacional (10th ed., pp. 69-90). São Paulo: Cortez. |
| [2] | Imbernón, F. (2004). Formação docente e profissional—formar-se para a mudança e a incerteza (4th ed.). São Paulo: Cortez. |
| [3] | Mészáros, I. (2005). A educação para além do capital. Trad. de Isa Tavares. São Paulo: Boitempo. |
| [4] | Penitente, L. A. A., Castro, R. M., & Garrossino, S. R. B. (2007). Contribuições do método histórico dialético na pesquisa em educação. In M. Del Roio (Org.), Trabalho, política e cultura em Gramsci: os 70 anos da morte de Gramsci (pp. 213-216). Marília: Oficina Universitária Unesp. |
| [5] | Vasconcelos, C. S. (1999). Planejamento: projeto de ensino-aprendizagem e projeto político-pedagógico (5th ed.). São Paulo: Libertad.eww141028lx |
评论
发表评论