Poverty and Governance—A Critical Appraisal of a Philosophy and Practice of Development in Africa

Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48452#.VDy8fFfHRK0

Author(s) 

Ani Casimir, Emma Omeh, Chinedu C. Ike

Affiliation(s)

Department of Philosophy, Institute of African Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria; Department of Philosophy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Department of Philosophy, Institute of African Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria; Department of Philosophy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Department of Political Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.

ABSTRACT

The European postcolonial literature and global discourse about development concerns in Africa have witnessed a dominance of a development theory which has failed to capture the true aspirations, values and authentic problems of development confronting the people of Africa. This pro- western European theoretical framework bars African culture and values from being factored as motives, dynamics and outcomes that drive development on the continent. This absence has led to the flaunting of theories of development which favors and recommends the Breton Wood-inspired World Bank solutions/approaches to fast tracking development plans and goals in the continent. At the heart of the failure of these externally imposed prescriptions is the irreconcilability of the prospect of its resultant economic growth indicators and the production of measurable development outcomes in the lives of the people. Gross domestic product rate results in growth patterns which post impressive economic statistics; but the reality on the ground shows that there is wor- sening destitution and deepening poverty in household incomes, purchasing power parity and deliverables. Economic policies, engineered by good governance, lead to better management of state resources, production of pro-poor and pro-people outcomes which results in a better standard of living for the people. Bad governance has been a consistent leading contributor to increasing poverty and underdevelopment in the African continent. To reverse this scenario, there is a need to re-evaluate the conceptual framework and philosophy of development theory in post colonial Africa so as to achieve poverty reduction and good governance in the context of our cultural milieu. This re-evaluation would enable governance and the leadership to experience a shift in development paradigm that will empower development policy in Africa. My paper will therefore explore the content of this new framework and draw out its dialectical relationships and implications leading to recommendations for a new African perspective on development that will benefit Africans. These are emerging critical challenges that will definitely change the tenor and content of academic discourse as conceived in the philosophy of development and political economy. Development scholars, political scientists and philosophers will be compelled to re-examine the way African leaders and the so-called western consultants to Africa conceive development and underdevelopment concerns in the continent. Development is about people, so any theory or model of development should be a dialectical mirror of the way of life of a people, in an aspirational, sociological, political and technological terms and for the achievement of measureable results.

KEYWORDS

Philosophy, Political Science, Governance, Dialectical Nexus, Paradigm Shift, African Development, Millennium, Globalization and Poverty Reduction

Cite this paper

Casimir, A. , Omeh, E. and Ike, C. (2014) Poverty and Governance—A Critical Appraisal of a Philosophy and Practice of Development in Africa. Open Journal of Political Science, 4, 164-179. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2014.43018. 

 

References

[1]	Adedeji, A. (1989). The African Alternative Programme for Socio-Economic Recovery and Transformation [AAF-SAP]. Addis Ababa: E/ECA/CM.
[2]	Adedeji, A. (1996). Africa within the World: Beyond Dispossession and Dependence.
[3]	Areji, A. (2005). Europcentricity and Globalization culled from UCHE. Journal of the Department of Philoophy, 2, 55-56.
[4]	Basel, T. (2013). Human Development as Human Value—An African Paradigm. Nsukka: Cepper Press, University of Nigeria.
[5]	Blomstrom, M. B. (1978). Development Theory in Transition—The Dependency Debate and Beyond: Third World Responses. London: Zed Books.
[6]	Chachage, C. S. L. (1994). Discourse on Development among African Philosophers. In Himmestrand et al., Eds., African Perspectives on Development (p. 51). London: St Marins Press.
[7]	Cribson, J. H. (1961). The Remaking of Man in Africa. London: Oxford Press.
[8]	Dukor, M. (2010). Theistic Humanism of African Philosophy-The Great Debate on Substance and Methodology of African philosophy. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
[9]	Esedese, P. O. (1978). The Emergence of Pan—African Ideas in Themes in African Social and Political Thought. Enugu: Fourth Dimension Publishers.
[10]	Himmelstrand, U. et al. (1988). In Search of New Paradigms—African Perspectives on Development, op cit. ps. CA New Framework for African Development.
[11]	Hountondy, Y. (1983). African Philosophy: Myth and Reality. London: Hutchion prers, 102.
[12]	Moses, M. (2007). African Philosophy: End of a Controversy? Ile Ife: OAU Press.
[13]	Mudimbe, V. (1984). African Gnosis: Philosophy and the Order of Knowledge. Los Angeles: African Studies Association.
[14]	NEEDS (2003). NEEDS Stands for the Nigerian Economic Empowerment Development Strategy Which Was Nigeria’s Strategy and Plan to Bring about Development and Reduce Poverty among the Nigerian Poor. It Had Parallel Programs for at the State and Local Government Levels Known as SEEDS and LEEDS Respectively (State Economic Empowerment Development Strategy Local Economic Empowerment Development Strategy) NEEDS Was Nigerian Elite’s Version of a World Bank Directed Poverty Reduction and Development Blue Print It Was Supposed to Be Country-Owned Home Grown.
[15]	Nwoye, K. O. (2000). Corruption, Leadership and the Dialectics of Development—An Exploratory Perspective. Enugu: Associated Co. Ltd., 50.
[16]	Nzongola & Ntalaja (1989). The African Crisis: The Way out. African Studies Review, 32.
[17]	Obiora, I. (2000). Development Is about People. CA New Framework for African Development. Enugu: CIDJAP Press, 1-3.
[18]	Obiora, I. (2001). This Meaning Was Adopted at June 1994 in a Conference Titled “RETHINKING BRETON WOODS”, Held in Washington D.C, and Attended by Theologians, Economists, Historians, Lawyers, Sociologists, NGO’s, FBO’s, FBV’s and Churches from 20 Countries. Obiora Ike and Edoziem Enterprise Development Cooperation, Enugu: CIDJAP Press, iii.
[19]	Obiora, I. (2003). Development Is about People, Business Is about Ethics. Enugu: CIDJAP Press.
[20]	Omoyibo, N. (1998). Philosophy as a Tool for Sustainable Development: A Contemporary Issue in Nigerian Educational System. Delta State University, Abraka, African Journal of Social Sciences, 1.
[21]	Onyeocha, I. P. (2011). Africa—The Country, the Concept and the Horizon. Amazon Publishers.
[22]	Oruka, H. O. (1985). Punishment and Tenorism in Africa. Nairobi: Kenya Literature Review.
[23]	Peers, D. (1972). What Are We Trying to Measure. Journal of Development Studies, 8, 21-36.
[24]	Perroux, F. (1964). El liderazgo norteamericano. eBook, Francois Perroux, 1964, Search (Open Library) by Francois 1 Edition, First Published in 1964.
[25]	President Bharrat Jaged, the President’s Release of the Communiqué Issued afar the Commonwealth Meeting at Their London Secretariat on June as Reported on the First Page of Guardian of Wednesday, 11th June 2008, 1-2.
[26]	Samuel, C. (1998). The Development Debates & The Crisis of Development Theories. Tanzania: Catholic Press.
[27]	Schumpeter, J. (1912). Schumpeter in His “Theorie de Wirtschafilishcme Entwicklung”.
[28]	Temples, P. (1976). “Placide Temples” Bantu Philosophy.
[29]	The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Defined Sustainable.                                             eww141014lx