跳至主要内容

Do Policy Based Adoptions Increase the Care a Pet Receives? An Exploration of a Shift to Conversation Based Adoptions at One Shelter

Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50847#.VE3Wl1fHRK0

Animal shelters’ adoption processes vary across the US. Some programs have rigorous policy based programs in which potential adopters are screened in or out based on their responses to a series of qualifying questions. Some other organizations use a conversation based approach with-out policies around such things as income, vaccination status of animals in the home and landlord approval. Those organizations that use the policy-based approach do so with the premise that the animal will be loved and cared for better by those that meet their criteria. Policy based adoptions can be arduous and can decrease adoptions, as, for example, those living in apartments that are unable to prove their landlord accepts pets are turned away. We hypothesized that meeting or not meeting policy based criteria would have no impact on the care or bond of the adopter with the pet. This study examined the quality of care and attachment in two groups of adopters, a group that adopted while policy based adoptions were in place and a group that adopted when policies were eliminated. There were no substantial differences between the two groups. This important finding indicates that those that adopt through conversation based adoptions (policy-free) provide similar high quality care and are just as likely to be highly bonded to their pet as those that adopt through policy based adoptions.
Cite this paper
Weiss, E. , Gramann, S. , Dolan, E. , Scotto, J. and Slater, M. (2014) Do Policy Based Adoptions Increase the Care a Pet Receives? An Exploration of a Shift to Conversation Based Adoptions at One Shelter. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 4, 313-322. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2014.45040. 
 

[1] ASPCA (2014) Pet Statistics. http://www.aspca.org/about-us/faq/pet-statistics
[2] Shore, E.R., Douglas, D.K. and Riley, M.L. (2005) What’s in It for the Companion Animal? Pet Attachment and College Students’ Behavior towards Pets. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 8, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0801_1
[3] Miller-Dowling, J. and Stitely, C. (1997) Killing Ourselves over the Euthanasia Debate. Shelter Sense, 2, 4-15.
[4] American Humane Association (2013) Keeping Pets (Dogs and Cats) in Homes: A Three-Phase Retention Study. Phase 1: Reasons for Not Owning a Dog or Cat.
http://www.americanhumane.org/aha-petsmart-retention-study-phase-1.pdf
[5] American Pet Products Association (2013) APPA National Pet Owners Survey, 2013-2014. American Pet Products Association, Inc., Greenwich.
[6] Taylor, N. (2004) In It for the Non-Human Animals: Animal Welfare, Moral Certainty, and Disagreements. Society and Animals, 12, 317-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568530043068047
[7] Scarlett, J.M., Salman, M.D., New Jr., J.G. and Kass, P.H. (1999) Reasons for Relinquishment of Companion Animals in US Animal Shelters: Selected Health and Personal Issues. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2, 41-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0201_4
[8] Shore, E.R. (2005) Returning a Recently Adopted Companion Animal: Adopters’ Reasons for and Reactions to the Failed Adoption Experience. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 8, 187-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0803_3
[9] Weiss, E. and Gramann, S. (2009) A Comparison of Attachment Levels of Adopters of Cats: Fee-Based Adoptions versus Free Adoptions. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12, 360-370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888700903163674
[10] New Jr., J.C., Salman, M.D., King, M., Scarlett, J., Kass, P. and Hutchinson, J. (2000) Characteristics of Shelter-Relinquished Animals and Their Owners Compared with Animals and Their Owners in US Pet-Owning Households. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 3, 179-201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0303_1
[11] Patronek, G.J., Glickman, L.T., Beck, A.M., McCabe, G.P. and Ecker, C. (1996) Risk Factors for Relinquishment of Dogs to an Animal Shelter. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 209, 572-581.
[12] Patronek, G.J., Glickman, L.T., Beck, A.M., McCabe, G.P. and Ecker, C. (1996) Risk Factors for Relinquishment of Cats to an Animal Shelter. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 209, 582-588.
[13] Weiss, E., Dolan, E.D., Garrison, L., Hong, J. and Slater, M. (2013) Should Dogs and Cats Be Given as Gifts? Animals, 3, 995-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani3040995
[14] Toledo Area Humane Society (2011) About Us. https://www.toledohumane.org/about/7-about-us
[15] American Humane Association (2013) Keeping Pets (Dogs and Cats) in Homes: A Three-Phase Retention Study. Phase 2: Descriptive Study of Post-Adoption Retention in Six Shelters in Three US Cities. http://www.americanhumane.org/petsmart-keeping-pets-phase-ii.pdf                       eww141027lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文