Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48492#.VD92UVfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48492#.VD92UVfHRK0
Author(s)
The article will critically examine the fundamental
flaws that have been newly discovered from the “latest” case studies. In
recent decades, numerous miscarriages of justice have occurred in China
mainly due to the insufficient or improper use of forensic evidence.
Comments on the “latest” flaw will start from an overview of the
notorious wrongful conviction in Case ZHANG Gaoping and ZHANG Hui whose
exonerations in 2013 were based on the proper use of forensic techniques
such as DNA testing. The case highlights the injustice that results
when forensic evidence is ignored in favour of wrongful confessions
extorted under police torture. It has been suggested that China’s
several waves of forensic science reform cannot lead the current
forensic identification to objective, fair or reliable forensic
evidence. The “latest” founded flaw entrenched in its forensic system
failed to be solved by technical, financial, administrative or legal
progress only. In essence, the 2005 reform on forensic identification is
flawed to its core, albeit being recently identified. This is primarily
because in law forensic experts inside police can conduct
identification to provide forensic evidence on cases investigated by
police, which cannot ensure necessary check or balance to prevent or
reduce forensic errors in practice.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Jiang Na (2014) China’s Forensic System: Critical Comments on the “Latest” Flaw. Chinese Studies, 3, 96-99. doi: 10.4236/chnstd.2014.33013.
| [1] | Boehler, P. (2013). Supreme People’s Court Judge Urges End to Wrongful Convictions. South China Morning Post. http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1232279/supreme-peoples-court-judge-urges-end-wrongful-convictions |
| [2] | Guo Hua (2012). Research on Several Legal Issues of Judicial Psychiatric Identification. Faxuejia, 2, 121-136. http://law.cssn.cn/fx/fx_sfjdx/201310/t20131029_739887.shtml |
| [3] | He Jiahong, & He Ran (2012). Empirical Studies of Wrongful Convictions in Mainland China. The University of Cincinnati Law Review, 80, 1277-1292. http://scholarship.law.uc.edu/uclr/vol80/iss4/11 |
| [4] |
Li Xinran (2013). Sorry’ Is Not Enough for Wrongful Convictions. Shanghai Daily.
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/Opinion/chinese-perspectives/Sorry-is-not-enough-for-wrongful-convictions/shdaily.shtml |
| [5] | Pearson, G. (2011). Policing Serious Crime in China: From “Strike Hard” to “Kill Fewer” By Susan Trevaskes. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 230-233. |
| [6] |
Shen Xinwang, & Wang Quanbao (2013). ISSUU—July 2013 by China Newsweek Corporation.
http://issuu.com/newschinamag/docs/july13 |
| [7] | Teng Biao (2011). Blood, Justice and Corruption: Why the Chinese Love Their Death Penalty. http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2075010,00.html |
| [8] | Trevaskes, S. (2006). Severe and Swift Justice in China. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 23-41. |
| [9] | Wong, K. C. (2011). Police Reform in China (p. 300). CRC Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b11378 eww141016lx |
| [10] | Xu, Jinghe (2005). Deepening Reform on Judicial Identification, Realizing Several Transitions and Ensuing Judicial Justice. http://www.legalinfo.gov.cn/moj/zgsfjd/2005-10/25/content_220040.htm |
评论
发表评论