Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53860#.VNhjAyzQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53860#.VNhjAyzQrzE
Affiliation(s)
1Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
2Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
2Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
ABSTRACT
Assessing
geographic variations in health events is one of the major tasks in
spatial epidemiologic studies. Geographic variation in a health event
can be estimated using the neighborhood-level variance that is derived
from a generalized mixed linear model or a Bayesian spatial hierarchical
model. Two novel heterogeneity measures, including median odds ratio
and interquartile odds ratio, have been developed to quantify the
magnitude of geographic variations and facilitate the data
interpretation. However, the statistical significance of geographic
heterogeneity measures was inaccurately estimated in previous
epidemiologic studies that reported two-sided 95% confidence intervals
based on standard error of the variance or 95% credible intervals with a
range from 2.5th to 97.5th percentiles of the
Bayesian posterior distribution. Given the mathematical algorithms of
heterogeneity measures, the statistical significance of geographic
variation should be evaluated using a one-tailed P value. Therefore,
previous studies using two-tailed 95% confidence intervals based on a
standard error of the variance may have underestimated the geographic
variation in events of their interest and those using 95% Bayesian
credible intervals may need to re-evaluate the geographic variation of
their study outcomes.
KEYWORDS
Spatial Epidemiology, Heterogeneity, Statistical Significance, 95% Confidence Interval, 95% Credible Interval
Cite this paper
References
Lian, M. (2015) Statistical Significance of Geographic Heterogeneity Measures in Spatial Epidemiologic Studies. Open Journal of Statistics, 5, 46-50. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2015.51006.
[1] | Elliott,
P. and Wartenberg, D. (2004) Spatial Epidemiology: Current Approaches
and Future Challenges. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112, 998-1006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6735 |
[2] | Larsen,
K., Petersen, J.H., Budtz-Jorgensen, E. and Endahl, L. (2000)
Interpreting Parameters in the Logistic Regression Model with Random
Effects. Biometrics, 56, 909-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00909.x |
[3] | Larsen,
K. and Merlo, J. (2005) Appropriate Assessment of Neighborhood Effects
on Individual Health: Integrating Random and Fixed Effects in Multilevel
Logistic Regression. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161, 81-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi017 |
[4] | Merlo,
J., Chaix, B., Ohlsson, H., Beckman, A., Johnell, K., Hjerpe, P.,
Rastam, L. and Larsen, K. (2006) A Brief Conceptual Tutorial of
Multilevel Analysis in Social Epidemiology: Using Measures of Clustering
in Multilevel Logistic Regression to Investigate Contextual Phenomena.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 290-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.029454 |
[5] | Chaix,
B., Merlo, J., Subramanian, S.V., Lynch, J. and Chauvin, P. (2005)
Comparison of a Spatial Perspective with the Multilevel Analytical
Approach in Neighborhood Studies: The Case of Mental and Behavioral
Disorders Due to Psychoactive Substance Use in Malmo, Sweden, 2001.
American Journal of Epidemiology, 162, 171-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi175 |
[6] | Chaix,
B., Rosvall, M. and Merlo, J. (2007) Assessment of the Magnitude of
Geographical Variations and Socioeconomic Contextual Effects on
Ischaemic Heart Disease Mortality: A Multilevel Survival Analysis of a
Large Swedish Cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61,
349-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.047597 eww150209lx |
评论
发表评论