跳至主要内容

Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, and the Housing Bubble

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53790#.VNMf8yzQrzE

ABSTRACT
The paper employs monthly data to test alternative hypotheses for the causes of the large increase and subsequent decline in U.S. housing prices during the 2000-2010 decade. The empirical evidence using VAR modeling is consistent with the hypothesis that Federal Reserve interest rate policy was a cause of the movements in housing prices. In addition, federal fiscal policy and interest rates on adjustable-rate mortgages are found to be associated with housing prices. On the other hand, the interest rate on standard 30-year mortgages and a measure of net capital flows from abroad were not related to housing prices. Foreclosure rates were also important. The study finds that foreclosures and housing prices interacted: more foreclosures produced lower housing prices and lower housing prices generated more foreclosures.
 
Cite this paper
McDonald, J. and Stokes, H. (2015) Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, and the Housing Bubble. Modern Economy, 6, 165-178. doi: 10.4236/me.2015.62014.
 
References
[1]Kain, J.F. and Quigley, J.M. (1972) Housing Market Discrimination, Homeownership, and Savings Behavior. American Economic Review, 62, 263-277.
 
[2]Bernasek, A. (2014) The Typical Household, Now Worth a Third Less. New York Times.
 
[3]Shiller, R.J. (2009) The Subprime Solution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
 
[4]Taylor, J. (2007) Getting Off Track. Hoover Press, Stanford.
 
[5]McDonald, J.F. and Stokes, H.H. (2013) Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 46, 437-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11146-011-9329-9
 
[6]McDonald, J.F. and Stokes, H.H. (2013) The Housing Price Bubble, Monetary Policy, and the Foreclosure Crisis in the United States. Applied Economics Letters, 20, 1104-1108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.791009
 
[7]Bernanke, B.S. (2013) The Federal Reserve and the Financial Crisis. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
 
[8]Dokko, J., Doyle, B., Kiley, M.T., Kim, J., Sherlund, S., Sim, J., et al. (2009) Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble. Economic Policy, 237-287.
 
[9]Blinder, A. (2013) After the Music Stopped. Penguin Press, New York.
 
[10]Greenspan, A. (2010) The Crisis. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 201-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/eca.2010.0004
 
[11]McDonald, J.F. and Stokes, H.H. (2013) Monetary Policy, Mortgage Rates and the Housing Bubble. Economics & Finance Research, 1, 82-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21649480.2013.870490
 
[12]Grossman, S.R. (2013) Wrong: Nine Economic Policy Disasters and What We Can Learn From Them. Oxford University Press, New York.
 
[13]Zandi, M. (2009) Financial Shock. Updated Edition, FT Press, Upper Saddle River.
 
[14]Jiang, W., Nelson, A.A. and Vytlacil, E. (2014) Liar’s Loan? Effects of Origination Channel and Information Falsification on Mortgage Delinquency. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00387
 
[15]Bernanke, B.S. and Blinder, A.S. (1992) The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission. The American Economic Review, 82, 901-921.
 
[16]McDonald, J.F. and Stokes, H.H. (2013) Dynamics of Housing Price: Foreclosure Rate Interactions. ISRN Economics, 2013, Article ID: 250459.
 
[17]Miles, W. (2014) The Housing Bubble: How Much Blame Does the Fed Really Deserve? Journal of Real Estate Research, 36, 41-58.
 
[18]Granger, C.W.J. (1969) Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912791
 
[19]Christiano, L.J. and Fitzgerald, T.J. (2003) The Band Pass Filter. International Economic Review, 44, 435-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00076
 
[20]Hodrick, R.J. and Prescott, E.C. (1997) Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2953682
 
[21]Enders, W. (2010) Applied Econometric Time Series. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
 
[22]Doan, T. (2010) Rats User’s Manual: Version 8.0. Estima, Evanston.
 
[23]Sims, C.A. and Zha, T. (1999) Error Bounds for Impulse Responses. Econometrica, 67, 1113-1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00071
 
[24]Tiao, G. and Box, G. (1981) Modeling Multiple Time Series with Applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 802-816.
 
[25]Adams, K., Kuang, P. and Marcet, A. (2011) House Price Booms and the Current Account. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, NBER Working Paper No. 17224. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w17224
 
[26]Gete, P. (2014) Housing Markets and Current Account Dynamics. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University, SSRN-id1558512.pdf. http://faculty.georgetown.edu/pg252/H&CAbyGete.pdf
 
[27]Laibson, D. and Mollerstrom, J. (2010) Capital Flows, Consumption Booms, and Asset Bubbles: A Behavioral Alternative to the Savings Glut Hypothesis. Economic Journal of London, 120, 354-374.
 
[28]Bredthauer, J. and Geppert, J. (2013) A Variance Decomposition Analysis of the Housing Bubble. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 19, 235-249.
 
[29]Nneji, O., Brooks, C. and Ward, C. (2013) Intrinsic and Rational Speculative Bubbles in the U.S. Housing Market: 1960-2011. Journal of Real Estate Research, 35, 121-151.
 
[30]Jin, C., Soydemir, G. and Tidwell, A. (2014) The U. S. Housing Market and the Pricing of Risk: Fundamental Analysis and Market Sentiment. Journal of Real Estate Research, 36, 187-219.                   eww150205lx

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...