跳至主要内容

Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer (Series of 50 Cases)

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=54107#.VO1-UizQrzE

Author(s)
  1. Abdelaziem1, Mohamed S. Hashish1*, Ahmed Nafea Suliman2, David Sargsyan2
  2.  
Affiliation(s)
1Department of General Surgery, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt.
2Department of General Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation HMC, Doha, Qatar.

ABSTRACT
Background: Perforated peptic ulcer is a common surgical emergency. The classic treatment is the mid-line laparotomy. However, laparoscopic treatment has been shown to be reliable. Few studies have evaluated its overall utility. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients and Methods: This study included 50 patients presented by perforated peptic ulcer between July 2009 and August 2014. They were submitted to laparoscopic omental patch repair with thorough peritoneal wash. Patients’ demographics, diagnostic techniques, management and outcome were evaluated. Results: The mean age was 38.6 years with male to female ratio being 1.6:1. The perforation was diagnosed by plain X-ray abdomen in erect position in 43 patients and by abdominal CT scan in 7 patients. The laparoscopic repair of the perforation was successful in 48 patients while in 2 patients mid-line laparotomy was needed for proper control of the severe intra-abdominal sepsis. Post-operatively, all patients tolerated soft diet on the 3rd post-operative day and full diet on the 4th post-operative day. The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.5 days. Two patients developed post-operative intra-abdominal collection that was treated by ultrasound guided drainage, three patients developed umbilical port site wound infection while only two patients developed leakage, one of them reoperated after failed conservative surgery. No mortality was encountered in the study. Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a safe and reliable technique with accepted morbidity and mortality rates with all the advantages of the minimally invasive surgery.

KEYWORDS
Laparoscopy, Perforation, Peptic Ulcer, Omental Patch

Cite this paper
Abdelaziem, S. , Hashish, M. , Suliman, A. and Sargsyan, D. (2015) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer (Series of 50 Cases). Surgical Science, 6, 80-90. doi: 10.4236/ss.2015.62014.

References
[1][1] Bertleff, M.J. and Lange, J.F. (2010) Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review of History and Treatment. Digestive Surgery, 27, 161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000264653
 
[2]Hopkins, R.J., Girardi, L.S. and Turney, E.A. (1996) Relationship between Helicobacter Pylori Eradication and Reduced Duodenal and Gastric Ulcer Recurrence: A Review. Gastroenterology, 110, 1244-1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613015
 
[3]Mouret, P., Francois, Y., Vignal, J., et al. (1990) Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Peptic Ulcer. British Journal of Surgery, 77, 1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800770916
 
[4]Nathanson, L.K., Easter, D.W. and Cuschieri, A. (1990) Laparoscopic Repair/Peritoneal Toilet of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer. Surgical Endoscopy, 4, 232-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00316801
 
[5]Druart, M.L., Van Hee, R., Etienne, J., et al. (1997) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer. A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 11, 1017-1020.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004649900515
 
[6]Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Systematic Review Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcers. British Journal of Surgery, 92, 1195-1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5155
 
[7]Bhogal, R.H., Athwal, R., Durkin, D., et al. (2008) Comparison between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Ulcer Disease. World Journal of Surgery, 32, 2371-2374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9707-5
 
[8]Sommer, T., Elbroend, H. and Friis-Andersen, H. (2010) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Ulcer in Western Denmark —A Retrospective Study. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 99, 119-121.
 
[9]Xia, B., Xia, H.H., Ma, C., et al. (2005) Trends in the Prevalence of Peptic Ulcer Disease and Helicpbacter Pylori Infection in Family Physician-Referred Uninvestigated Dyspeptic Patients in Hong Kong. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 22, 243-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02554.x
 
[10]Wang, F.W., Tu, M.S., Chuang, H.Y., et al. (2011) Prevalence and Risk Factors of Asymptomatic Peptic Ulcer Disease in Taiwan. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17, 1199-1203.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i9.1199
 
[11]Lu, C.L., Chang, S.S., Wang, S.S., Chang, F.Y. and Lee, S.D. (2004) Silent Peptic Ulcer Disease: Frequency, Factors Leading to Silence, and Implications Regarding the Pathogenesis of Visceral Symptoms. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 60, 34-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01311-2
 
[12]Bertleff, M.J. and Lange, J.F. (2010) Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: First Choice? A Review of Literature. Surgical Endoscopy, 24, 1231-1239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z
 
[13]Vaidya, B.B., Chaitanya, P.G. and Shah, J.B. (2009) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer with Delayed Presentation. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 19, 153-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0328
 
[14]Bertleff, M.J., Halm, J.A., Bemelman, W.A., van der Ham, A.C., van der Harst, E., Oei, H.I., et al. (2009) Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer: The LAMA Trial. World Journal of Surgery, 33, 1368-1373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0054-y
 
[15]Lee, J., Sung, K., Lee, D., Lee, W. and Kim, W. (2011) Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of a Perforated Duodenal Ulcer: Intracorporeal “Cross and Twin” Knotting. Surgical Endoscopy, 25, 229-233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1164-1
 
[16]Ates, M., Sevil, S., Bakircioglu, E. and Colak, C. (2007) Laparoscopic Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforation without Omental Patch versus Conventional Open Repair. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 17, 615-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.0195
 
[17]Sauerland, S., Agresta, F., Bergamaschi, R., Borzellino, G., Budzynski, A., Champault, G., et al. (2006) Laparoscopy for Abdominal Emergencies. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 14-29.
 
[18]Lau, W.Y. (2002) Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Open versus Laparoscopic Repair. Asian Journal of Surgery, 25, 267-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60190-1
 
[19]Boey, J. and Wong, J. (1987) Perforated Duodenal Ulcers. World Journal of Surgery, 11, 319-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01658109
 
[20]Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers. Surgical Endoscopy, 19, 1565-1571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0146-1
 
[21]Katkhouda, N., Mavor, E., Mason, R.J., Campos, G.M.R., Soroushyari, A. and Berne, T.V. (1999) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers: Outcome and Efficacy in 30 Consecutive Patients. Archives of Surgery, 134, 845-848. Discussion 849-850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.134.8.845
 
[22]Thorsen, K., Glomsaker, T.B., Meer, A.V., Soreide, K. and Arne S?reide, J. (2011) Trends in Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 15, 1329-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1482-1
 
[23]Lo, H.C., Wu, S.C., Huang, H.C., Yeh, C.C., Huang, J.C. and Hsieh, C.H. (2011) Laparoscopic Simple Closure Alone Is Adequate for Low Risk Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer. World Journal of Surgery, 35, 1873-1878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1106-7
 
[24]Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Risk Factors Influencing the Early Outcome Results after Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer and Their Predictive Value. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 390, 413-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0569-0
 
[25]Palanivelu, C., Jani K. and Senthilnathan, P. (2007) Laparoscopic Management of Duodenal Ulcer Perforation: Is It Advantageous? Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 26, 64-66.
 
[26]Lam, P.W.F., Lam, M.C.S., Hui, E.K.L., Sun, Y.W. and Mok, F.P.T. (2005) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal ulceRs. The “Three-Stitch” Graham Patch Technique. Surgical Endoscopy, 19, 1627-1630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0020-1
 
[27]Arnaud, J.P., Tuech, J.J., Bergamaschi, R., Patrick, P. and Nicolas, R. (2002) Laparoscopic Suture Closure of Perforated Duodenal Peptic Ulcer. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Technique, 12, 145-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200206000-00001
 
[28]Schein, M., Gecelter, G., Freinkel, W., Gerding, H. and Becker, P.J. (1990) Peritoneal Lavage in Abdominal Sepsis. A Controlled Clinical Study. Archives of Surgery, 125, 1132-1135.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410210058008
 
[29]Lagoo, S., McMahon, R.L., Kakihara, M., Pappas, T.N. and Eubanks, S. (2002) The Sixth Decision Regarding Perforated Duodenal Ulcer. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 6, 359-368.
 
[30]Lau, H. (2004) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Meta-Analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 18, 1013-1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y
 
[31]Robertson, G.S., Wemyss-Holden, S.A. and Maddern, G.J. (2000) Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers. The Role of Laparoscopy in Generalized Peritonitis. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 82, 6-10.
 
[32]Gupta, R., Sample, C., Bamehriz, F. and Birch, D.W. (2006) Infectious Complications Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 49, 397-400.
 
[33]Memon, M.A. (1997) Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Current Status. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 79, 393-402.
 
[34]Petrowsky, H., Demartines, N. and Rousson, V. (2004) Evidence-Based Value of Prophylactic Drainage in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Surgery, 240, 1074-1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000146149.17411.c5
 
[35]Merad, F., Yahchouchi, E., Hay, J.M., Fingerhut, A., Laborde, Y., Langlois-Zantain, O., et al. (1998) Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage after Elective Colonic Resection and Suprapromontory Anastomosis: A Multicenter Study Controlled by Randomization. French Association for Surgical Research. Archives of Surgery, 133, 309-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.3.309
 
[36]Dandapat, M.C. and Panda, C. (1992) A Perforated Appendix: Should We Drain? Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 90, 147-148.
 
[37]Nasir, A.A., Abdurahman, L.O. and Adeniran, J.O. (2012) Is Intra-Abdominal Drainage Necessary after Laparotomy for Typhoid Intestinal Perforation? Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 47, 355-358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.11.033
 
[38]Urbach, D.R., Kennedy, E.D. and Cohen, M.M. (1999) Colon and Rectal Anastomosis Do Not Require Routine Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Surgery, 229, 174-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199902000-00003
 
[39]Graham, R. (1937) The Treatment of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers. Surgery Gynecology Obstetric, 64, 235-238.
 
[40]Lunevicius, R. and Morkevicius, M. (2005) Management Strategies, Early Results, Benefits, and Risk Factors of Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer. World Journal of Surgery, 29, 1299-1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7705-4
 
[41]Siu, W.T., Leong, H.T., Law, B.K., Chau, C.H., Li, A., Fung, K.H., et al. (2002) Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Annals of Surgery, 235, 313-319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001
 
[42]Kirshtein, B., Bayme, M., Mayer, Lantsberg, T.L., Avinoach, E. and Mizrahi, S. (2005) Laparoscopic Treatment of Gastro-Duodenal Perforations. Surgical Endoscopy, 19, 1487-1490.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2237-9                                    eww150225lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

A Comparison of Methods Used to Determine the Oleic/Linoleic Acid Ratio in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Cultivated peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil and food crop. It is also a cheap source of protein, a good source of essential vitamins and minerals, and a component of many food products. The fatty acid composition of peanuts has become increasingly important with the realization that oleic acid content significantly affects the development of rancidity. And oil content of peanuts significantly affects flavor and shelf-life. Early generation screening of breeding lines for high oleic acid content greatly increases the efficiency of developing new peanut varieties. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of methods used to classify individual peanut seed as high oleic or not high oleic. Three hundred and seventy-four (374) seeds, spanning twenty-three (23) genotypes varying in oil composition (i.e. high oleic (H) or normal/not high oleic (NH) inclusive of all four peanut market-types (runner, Spanish, Valencia and Virginia), were individually tested ...
发表评论
阅读全文

Location Optimization of a Coal Power Plant to Balance Costs against Plant’s Emission Exposure

Fuel and its delivery cost comprise the biggest expense in coal power plant operations. Delivery of electricity from generation to consumers requires investment in power lines and transmission grids. Placing a coal power plant or multiple power plants near dense population centers can lower transmission costs. If a coalmine is nearby, transportation costs can also be reduced. However, emissions from coal plants play a key role in worsening health crises in many countries. And coal upon combustion produces CO 2 , SO 2 , NO x , CO, Metallic and Particle Matter (PM10 & PM2.5). The presence of these chemical compounds in the atmosphere in close vicinity to humans, livestock, and agriculture carries detrimental health consequences. The goal of the research was to develop a methodology to minimize the public’s exposure to harmful emissions from coal power plants while maintaining minimal operational costs related to electric distribution losses and coal logistics. The objective was...
发表评论
阅读全文

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Use of a Home-Use High-Frequency Facial Treatment Appliance

At present, many home-use beauty devices are available in the market. In particular, many products developed for facial treatment use light, e.g., a flash lamp or a light-emitting diode (LED). In this study, the safety of 4 weeks’ continuous use of NEWA TM , a high-frequency facial treatment appliance, every alternate day at home was verified, and its efficacy was evaluated in Japanese individuals with healthy skin aged 30 years or older who complained of sagging of the facial skin.  Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), melanin levels, erythema levels, sebum secretion levels, skin color changes and wrinkle improvement in the facial skin were measured before the appliance began to be used (study baseline), at 2 and 4 weeks after it had begun to be used, and at 2 weeks after completion of the 4-week treatment period (6 weeks from the study baseline). In addition, data obtained by subjective evaluation by the subjects themselves on a visual analog scale (VAS) were also analyzed. Fur...
发表评论
阅读全文