跳至主要内容

Intelligibility of Reverberant Speech with Amplification: Limitation of Speech Intelligibility Metrics, and a Preliminary Examination of an Alternative Approach

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53671#.VM8r9izQrzE

Author(s) 
Doheon Lee*, Eunju Gong, Densil Cabrera, Manuj Yadav, William L. Martens

Affiliation(s)
The Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

ABSTRACT
This study examines the effect of speech level on intelligibility in different reverberation conditions, and explores the potential of loudness-based reverberation parameters proposed by Lee et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 131(2), 1194-1205 (2012)] to explain the effect of speech level on intelligibility in various reverberation conditions. Listening experiments were performed with three speech levels (LAeq of 55 dB, 65 dB and 75 dB) and three reverberation conditions (T20 of 1.0 s, 1.9 s and 4.0 s), and subjects listened to speech stimuli through headphones. Collected subjective data were compared with two conventional speech intelligibility parameters (Speech Intelligibility Index and Speech Transmission Index) and two loudness-based reverberation parameters (EDTN and TN). Results reveal that the effect of speech level on intelligibility changes with a room’s reverberation conditions, and that increased level results in reduced intelligibility in highly reverberant conditions. EDTN and TN explain this finding better than do STI and SII, because they consider many psychoacoustic phenomena important for the modeling of the effect of speech level varying with reverberation.

KEYWORDS
Speech Intelligibility, Speech Level, Room Reverberation, Loudness

Cite this paper
Lee, D. , Gong, E. , Cabrera, D. , Yadav, M. and Martens, W. (2015) Intelligibility of Reverberant Speech with Amplification: Limitation of Speech Intelligibility Metrics, and a Preliminary Examination of an Alternative Approach. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 3, 177-186. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2015.32028.

References
[1]ISO 3382-1 (2009) Acoustics—Measurement of Room Acoustic Parameters—Part I: Performance Spaces. International Organization for Standardization.
 
[2]IEC 60268-16 (2011) Sound System Equipment—Part 16: Objective Rating of Speech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission index. International Electrotechnical Commission.
 
[3]ANSI S3.5 (1997) Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. American National Standard.
 
[4]Fletcher, H. (1922) The Nature of Speech and Its Interpretation. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 1, 129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1922.tb00384.x
 
[5]Kryter, K.D. (1946) Effects of Ear Protective Devices on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 18, 413-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1916380
 
[6]Pollack, I. and Pickett, J.M. (1958) Masking of Speech by Noise at High Sound Levels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 127-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1909503
 
[7]Hagerman, B. (1982) Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise. Scandinavian Audiology, 11, 79-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01050398209076203
 
[8]Lee, D. and Cabrera, D. (2010) Effect of Listening Level and Background Noise on the Subjective Decay Rate of Room Impulse Responses: Using Time-varying Loudness to Model Reverberance. Applied Acoustics, 71, 801-811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.04.005
 
[9]Lee, D., Cabrera, D. and Martens, W.L. (2012) The Effect of Loudness on the Reverberance of Music: Reverberance Prediction Using Loudness Models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 1194-1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3676602
 
[10]Glasberg, B.R. and Moore, B.C.J. (2002) A Model of loudness Applicable to Time-Varying Sound. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 50, 331-342.
 
[11]Chalupper, J. and Fastl, H. (2002) Dynamic Loudness Model (DLM) for Normal and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 378-386.
 
[12]Poulsen, T. (1981) Loudness of Tone Pulses in a Free Field. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 1786- 1790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.385915
 
[13]Sone, T., Suzuki, Y., Kumagai, M. and Takahashi, T. (1986) Loudness of a Single Burst of Impact Sound: Results of Round Robin Tests in Japan (I). Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 7, 173-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1250/ast.7.173
 
[14]Florentine, M., Buus, S. and Poulsen, T. (1996) Temporal Integration of Loudness as Function of Level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1633-1644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.415236
 
[15]Stevens, S.S. (1955) The Measurement of Loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 815-829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1908048
 
[16]Schroeder, M.R. (1965) New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 409-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1909343
 
[17]Moore, B J.C. and Glasberg, B.R. (2007) Modeling Binaural Loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1604-1612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2431331
 
[18]AS 2282 (1985) Acoustics—Methods of Assessing and Predicting Speech Privacy and Speech Intelligibility. Australian Standard.
 
[19]Cabrera, D., Lee, D., Yadav, M. and Martens, W.L. (2011) Decay Envelope Manipulation of Room Impulse Responses: Techniques for Auralization and Sonification. Proceedings of Acoustics, Gold Coast, 2-4 November 2011, CD-ROM.
 
[20]Cabrera, D., Jimenez, D. and Martens, W.L. (2014) Audio and Acoustical Response Analysis Environment (AARAE): a Tool to Support Education and Research in Acoustics. Proceedings of Internoise, Melbourne, 16-19 November 2014, CD-ROM.
 
[21]Cabrera, D., Lee, D., Leembruggen, G. and Jimenez, D. (2014) Increasing Robustness in the Calculation of the Speech Transmission Index. Building Acoustics, 12, 181-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/1351-010X.21.3.181
 
[22]Bradley, J.S., Reich, R. and Norcross, S.G. (1999) A Just Noticeable Difference n C50 for Speech. Applied Acoustics, 58, 99-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00075-9
 
[23]Studebaker, G.A., Sherbecoe, R.L., McDaniel, D.M. and Gwaltney, C.A. (1999) Monosyllabic Word Recognition at Higher-Than-Normal Speech and Noise Levels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2431-2444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.426848
 
[24]Morimoto, M., Sato, H. and Kobayashi, M. (2004) Listening Difficulty as a Subjective Measure for Evaluation of Speech Transmission Performance in Public Spaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1607-1613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1775276                                                         eww150202lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文