跳至主要内容

How Does the Change of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Affect Transportation Productivity? A Case Study of the US Transportation Sector from 2002 to 2011

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53863#.VNm0byzQrzE

Author(s)   
 
ABSTRACT
A variety of research fields has analyzed actual productivity change from environmental pollution through the Malmquist environmental productivity index, but to our best knowledge, no research has thus far been conducted in the transportation sector to evaluate the effects of a CO2 emissions change on actual productivity. For this reason, this study reviews how actual productivity in the US transportation sector has been affected by the CO2 emissions change for 2002-2012 and then reveals the driving forces behind it. We find that a CO2 emissions increase from 2002 to 2007 has a negative effect on actual productivity in the US transportation sector, but the CO2 emissions reduction for 2008-2011 increases actual productivity. A state mainly showing a sustainable growing pattern (decrease in CO2 emissions and increase in actual productivity) experiences a higher technological innovation increase than an efficiency decrease. This finding suggests that using fuel-efficient and carbon reduction technologies as well as alternative transportation energy sources may be essential factors to both grow transportation and prevent global warming.
 
Cite this paper
Choi, J. and Roberts, D. (2015) How Does the Change of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Affect Transportation Productivity? A Case Study of the US Transportation Sector from 2002 to 2011. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 96-106. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.32013.
 
References
[1]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
 
[2]Barth, M. and Boriboonsomsin, K. (2008) Real-World Carbon Dioxide Impacts of Traffic Congestion. Transportation Research Record, 163-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2058-20
 
[3]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_wg2_report_impacts_adaptation_and_vulnerability.htm
 
[4]The US Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Greenhouse Gases. http://www.epa.gov/climate/climatechange/science/indicators/ghg/index.html
 
[5]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf
 
[6]The International Transport Forum (2010) Reducing Transport Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Trends and Data 2010. http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/Pub/pdf/10GHGTrends.pdf
 
[7]Krautzberger, L. and Wetzel, H. (2012) Transport and CO2: Productivity Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the European Commercial Transport Industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53, 435-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9569-z
 
[8]The US Department of Energy (2014) Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_coun.html
 
[9]The US Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Overview of Greenhouse Gases. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/co2.html
 
[10]Wang, M., Saricks, C. and Santini, D. (2014) Effects of Fuel Ethanol Use on Fuel-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-xf8nbkoc
 
[11]Karplus, V. and Paltsev, S. (2012) Proposed Vehicle Fuel Economy Standards in the US for 2017 to 2025. Transportation Research Record, 2287, 132-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2287-16
 
[12]The US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2014) Interactive Data. http://www.bea.gov/itable/
 
[13]The US Environmental Protection Agency (2014) State Energy CO2 Emissions. http://epa.gov/statelocalclimate/resources/state_energyco2inv.html
 
[14]The US Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. http://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/eab_web_docket.nsf/filings%20by%20appeal%20number/d67dd10def159ee28525771a0060f621/$file/exhibit%2034%20epa%20ghg%20emissions%20fact%20sheet...3.18.pdf
 
[15]Messa, C.A. (2006) Comparison of Emissions from Light Rail Transit, Electric Commuter Rail, and Diesel Multiple Units. Transportation Research Record, 1955, 26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1955-04
 
[16]Boriboonsomsin, K., Barth, M. and Xu, K. (2009) Improvements to On-Road Emission Modeling of Freeways with High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities. Transportation Research Record, 2123, 109-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2123-12
 
[17]Bittner, J., Baird, T. and Adams, T. (2012) Impacts of Panama Canal Expansion on US Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Transportation Research Record, 2273, 38-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2273-05
 
[18]Nealer, R., Matthews, H.S. and Hendrickson, C. (2012) Assessing the Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation Effectiveness of Potential US modal Freight Policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 588-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.010
 
[19]Winchester, N., McConnachie, D., Wollersheim, C. and Waitz, I.A. (2013) Economic and Emissions Impacts of Renewable Fuel Goals for Aviation in the US. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 58, 116-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.001
 
[20]Rodrigues, V.S., Beresford, A., Pettit, S., Bhattacharya, S. and Harris, I. (2014) Assessing the Cost and CO2 Emissions Impacts of Rerouteing UK Import Containers. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/58613/1/S.Pettit%20Post%20Print%5B1%5D.pdf
 
[21]Buehler, R. (2014) Daily Travel and CO2 Emissions from Passenger Transport: A Comparison of Germany and the United States. https://ralphbu.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/paper-14-1043-revised.pdf
 
[22]F?re, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Roos, P. (1992) Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharamacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametic Malmquist Approach. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 85-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00158770
 
[23]F?re, R. and Grosskopf, S. (1994) Theory and Calculation of Productivity Indexes. In: Eichhorn, W., Ed., Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Paris, 921-940.
 
[24]F?re, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. and Zhang, Z. (1994) Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries. The American Economic Review, 84, 66-83.
 
[25]F?re, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Roos, P. (1994) Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquiest Output Index Approach. In: Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y. and Seiford, L.M., Eds., Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 253-272.
 
[26]Hjalmarsson, L., Kumbhakar, S.C. and Heshmati, A. (1996) DEA, DFA and SFA: A Comparison. The Journal of Pro- ductivity Analysis, 7, 303-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00157046
 
[27]Ball, V., Lovell, C., Luu, H. and Nehring, R. (2004) Incorporating Environmental Impacts in the Measurement of Agricultural Productivity Growth. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 29, 436-460.
 
[28]Heng, Y., Lim, S.H. and Chi, J. (2012) Toxic Air Pollutants and Trucking Productivity in the US. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17, 309-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.01.001
 
[29]Lansink, A. and Silva, E. (2004) Non-Parametric Production Analysis of Pesticides Use in the Netherlands. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 49-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000012452.97645.30
 
[30]Managi, S., Opaluch, J.J., Jin, D. and Grigalunas, T.A. (2005) Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry. Land Economics, 81, 303-319.
 
[31]Watjanapukka, K. (2006) Productivity Analysis of US Electricity Generation. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
 
[32]Shortalla, O. and Barnesb, A. (2013) Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Technical Efficiency of Dairy Farmers. Ecological Indicators, 29, 478-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.022
 
[33]The US Department of Commerce (2014) The Logistics and Transportation Industry in the United States. http://selectusa.commerce.gov/industry-snapshots/logistics-and-transportation-industry-united-states
 
[34]The US Environmental Protection Agency (2014) State Climate and Energy Program. http://epa.gov/statelocalclimate/state/index.html
 
[35]The US Energy Information Administration (2014) Annual Energy Outlook 2014. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/
 
[36]The US Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Air Pollution and the Clean Air Act. http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/
 
[37]The US Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Regulations and Standards. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations.htm
 
[38]Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S. (2000) Theory and Application of Directional Distance Functions. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 93-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007844628920
 
[39]Choi, J., Roberts, D.C. and Lee, E. (2015) Productivity Growth in the Transportation Industries in the United States: An Application of the DEA Malmquist Productivity Index. American Journal of Operations Research, 5, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2015.51001
 
[40]The US Census Bureau (2014) American Fact Finder. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
 
[41]The US Energy Information Administration (2014) State Energy Data System (SEDS): 1960-2012. http://www.eia.gov/state/seds/seds-data-complete.cfm?sid=US
 
[42]Mendenhall, W. and Sincich, T. (2011) A Second Course in Statistics: Regression Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
 
[43]Daniel, W.W. (2000) Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Cengage Learning, Boston.         eww150210lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文