Functionally Incremental Sentence Processing and Reanalysis Difficulty in Head-Final Agglutinative Language
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53777#.VNMSlizQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53777#.VNMSlizQrzE
ABSTRACT
This
paper quantitatively expresses the degrees of processing difficulties
caused by syntactically different reanalyses in Japanese sentences by
questionnaire and self-paced reading experiments with non-syntactic
factors strictly controlled. We propose the functionally incremental
processing for Japanese sentences and we demonstrate that our hypothesis
is effective to explain the degree of the processing difficulty in
various sentence types. The peculiarity of Japanese processing and the
relevance of our results to the human sentence processing model are
discussed.
Cite this paper
References
Tokimoto,
S. and Uetsuki, M. (2015) Functionally Incremental Sentence Processing
and Reanalysis Difficulty in Head-Final Agglutinative Language. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 21-41. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2015.51003.
[1] | Abney, S. P. (1989). A Computational Model of Human Parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01069051 |
[2] | Amano, N., & Kondo, T. (1999). NTT Database Series: Nihongo-No goitokusei (Lexical Properties of Japanese). Tokyo: Sanseidoo. |
[3] | Aoshima,
S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing Filler-Gap
Dependencies in a Head-Final Language. Journal of Memory and Language,
51, 23-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.001 |
[4] | Bever, T. G. (1970). The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language (pp. 279-362). New York: John Wiley. |
[5] | Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. |
[6] | Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
[7] | Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
[8] | Cohen,
J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope:
An Interactive Graphic System for Designing and Controlling Experiments
in the Psychology Laboratory Using Macintosh Computers. Behavior
Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03204507 |
[9] | Fodor, J. D., & Ferreira, F. (Eds.) (1998). Re-analysis in Sentence Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
[10] | Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1998). Attach Anyway. In J. D. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in Sentence Processing (pp. 101-141). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
[11] | Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. |
[12] | Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C. (1998). Sentence Reanalysis, and Visibility. In J. D. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in Sentence Processing (pp. 143-176). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
[13] | Frazier,
L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and Correcting Errors during
Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally
Ambiguous Sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1 |
[14] | Gibson, E. (1991). A Computational Theory of Human Linguistic Processing: Memory Limitations and Processing Breakdown. Doctoral Dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. |
[15] | Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and Parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627682 |
[16] | Gunji, T. (1987). Japanese Phrase Structure Grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. |
[17] | Gunji, T. (1994). Shizengengo (Natural Langauge). Tokyo: Nihon-Hyooronsha. |
[18] | Gunji, T. (1995). An Overview of JPSG: A Constraint-Based Grammar for Japanese. In R. Mazuka, & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing (pp. 105-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[19] | Gunji, T., & Hashida, K. (Eds.) (1998). Topics in Constraint-Based Grammar of Japanese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
[20] | Hirose, Y. (2002). Resolution of Reanalysis Ambiguity in Japanese Relative Clauses: Early Use of Thematic Compatibility Information and Incremental Processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence Processing in East Asian Languages (pp. 31-52). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. |
[21] | Hirose, Y. (2003). Recycling Prosodic Boundaries. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 167-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022448308035 |
[22] | Hirose, Y., & Inoue, A. (1998). Ambiguity of Reanalysis in Parsing Complex Sentences in Japanese. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Vol. 31, pp. 71-93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
[23] | Kamide,
Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The Time-Course of
Prediction in Incremental Sentence Processing: Evidence from
Anticipatory Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133-156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8 |
[24] | Kamide,
Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1999). Incremental Pre-Head Attachment in
Japanese Parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 631-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016909699386211 |
[25] | Lewis, R. L. (1998). Reanalysis and Limited Repair Parsing: Learning off the Garden Path. In J. D. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in Sentence Processing (pp. 247-285). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
[26] | Mazuka, R., & Itoh, K. (1995). Can Japanese Speakers Be Led Down the Garden Path? In R. Mazuka, & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing (pp. 295-329). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[27] | Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Costs of Scrambling in Japanese Sentence Processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence Processing in East Asian Languages (pp. 131-166). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. |
[28] | Miyamoto,
E. T. (2002). Case Markers as Clause Boundary Inducers in Japanese.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 307-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019540324040 |
[29] | Miyamoto,
E. T., Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N. J., Aikawa, T., & Miyagawa, S.
(1999). A U-Shaped Relative Clause Attachment Preference in Japanese.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 663-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016909699386220 |
[30] | Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. |
[31] | Pritchett, B. L. (1988). Garden Path Phenomena and the Grammatical Basis of Language Processing. Language, 64, 539-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/414532 |
[32] | Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. |
[33] | Sturt,
P., & Crocker, M. W. (1996). Monotonic Syntactic Processing: A
Cross-Linguistic Study of Attachment and Reanalysis. Language and
Cognitive Processes, 11, 449-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016909696387123 |
[34] | Sturt,
P., Pickering, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (1999). Structural Change
and Reanalysis Difficulty in Language Comprehension. Journal of Memory
and Language, 40, 136-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2606 |
[35] | Tamaoka,
K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., & Miyaoka, Y. (2003). The Effects of
Phrase-Length Order and Scrambling in the Processing of Visually
Presented Japanese Sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32,
431-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024851729985 |
[36] | Tokimoto,
S. (2005). Disambiguation of Homonyms in Real-Time Japanese Sentence
Processing: Case-Markings and Thematic Constraint. Language and Speech,
48, 65-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480010401 |
[37] | Weinberg,
A. (1993). Parameters in the Theory of Sentence Processing: Minimal
Commitment Theory Goes East. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22,
339-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01068016 |
[38] | Yamashita,
H. (2000). Structural Computation and the Role of Morphological
Markings in the Processing of Japanese. Language and Speech, 43,
429-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309000430040501 eww150205lx |
评论
发表评论