跳至主要内容

Entrepreneurship Dynamics under Time Inconsistent Preferences

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53969#.VN2sRCzQrzE

Author(s) 

ABSTRACT
We investigate the implications of time inconsistent preferences on the entrepreneurial decision making. We use a time varying preference model to capture the optimal liquidation choice and investment allocation for the averse risk agent in the incomplete market. Compared to standard entrepreneurial dynamic framework, our model shows that inconsistent preferences may lead to under investment when the entrepreneur faces liquidity constraint and over investment when his liquid wealth is far away from the liquidation boundary. Moreover, the possibility of changing to the future stage has ambiguous influences on the exit decision and optimal investment.
 
Cite this paper
Liu, Y. and Yang, J. (2015) Entrepreneurship Dynamics under Time Inconsistent Preferences. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 5, 40-48. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2015.51004.
 
References
[1]Mcdonald, R. and Daniel, S. (1986) The Value of Waiting to Invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 707-727.
 
[2]Chong, W., Wang, N. and Yang, J.Q. (2012) A Unified Model of Entrepreneurship Dynamics. Journal of Financial Economics, 106, 1-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.002
 
[3]Laibson, D. (1997) Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443-477.
 
[4]Luttmer, E.G.J. and Thomas, M. (2003) Subjective Discounting in an Exchange Economy. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 959-989.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/376954
 
[5]DellaVigna, S. and Ulrike, M. (2004) Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 353-402.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0033553041382111
 
[6]Grenadier, S.R. and Wang, N. (2007) Investment under Uncertainty and Time-Inconsistent Preferences. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 2-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.002
 
[7]Harris, C. and David, L. (2004) Instantaneous Gratification. Mimeo.
 
[8]Merton, R.C. (1971) Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 373-413.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-X
 
[9]O’Donoghue, T. and Matthew, R. (1999) Doing It Now or Later. American Economic Review, 89, 103-124.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-X
 
[10]Madrian, B.C. and Shea, D.F. (2001) The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401 (k) Participation and Savings Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149-1187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543
 
[11]DellaVigna, S. and Malmendier, U. (2004) Overestimating Self Control: Evidence from the Health Club Industry. No. w10819, National Bureau of Economic Research.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10819                                                                 eww150213lx

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...