跳至主要内容

Models and Neural Bases of the Believing Process

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53183#.VLcb0snQrzE

ABSTRACT
Departing from the long debates on the role of faith/belief, recent interdisciplinary research has turned to characterize the features of the psychophysical processes underlying believing. Here we review recent cognitive neuroscience models of the believing process and propose a conceptual framework that integrates current theoretical and empiric knowledge about the processes of believing. There are theories that elegantly explain believing as a self-organization process of cognitive and emotional elements. Adding to the component of self-organized belief representation, dual-component models assume a belief evaluation component, which is probably supported by the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and explains the stability of the belief despite the changing environment. Borrowing an idea from the neural models for the mental representation of action or situation, inclusion of both perceptive and action informations as the construct of belief representation allows the intimate relationship between a specific belief and a specific range of behaviour. Furthermore, inclusion of the personal value or affective information in the representation explains the deep impact of one’s emotional and physical state on the believing process. For associating perception, action, and value in a representation, the medial frontal cortex (MFC) may play a key role. Recent neuro-cognitive models of self-cognition explain the developmental origin of such a representation and the hierarchically nested structure of three levels of complexity in the representations: basic physical level, interpersonal level, and higher social level. The integrated model provides a comprehensive perspective of the believing process which suggests the importance and future directions of this interdisciplinary approach.
 
Cite this paper
Sugiura, M. , Seitz, R. and Angel, H. (2015) Models and Neural Bases of the Believing Process. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 5, 12-23. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2015.51002.
 
References
[1]Huber, F. and Schmidt-Petri, C. (2009) Degrees of Belief. Vol. 342, Springer, Heidelberg.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9198-8
 
[2]Denoeux, T. and Masson, M.H. (2012) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. Vol. 164, Springer, Heidelberg.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29461-7
 
[3]Aune, D.E. (2013) Recent Readings of Paul Relating to Justification by Faith. In: Aune, D.E., Ed., Jesus, Gospel Tradition and Paul in the Context of Jewish and Greco-Roman Antiquity, Collected Essays II, Mohr, Tübingen, 472-523.
 
[4]Marguerat, D. (2013) The Pauline Gospel of Justification of Faith. In: Marguerat, D., Ed., Paul in Acts and Paul in His Letters, Mohr, Tübingen, 179-219.
 
[5]Kenny, A. (1992) What Is Faith?: Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
[6]Mitchell, B. (1994) Faith and Criticism: The Sarum Lectures 1992. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
[7]Smith, W.C. (1987) Faith and Belief. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
 
[8]Swinburne, R. (1983) Faith and Reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
[9]Helm, P. (1999) Faith and Reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 
[10]Plantinga, A. and Wolterstorff, N. (1983) Faith & Rationality: Reason & Belief in God. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
 
[11]Stich, S. (1985) From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief. MIT Press, Cambridge.
 
[12]Runehov, A.L.C. and Angel, H.F. (2013) The Process of Believing: Revisiting the Problem of Justifying Beliefs. Studies in Science and Theology, 14, 205-218.
 
[13]Coltheart, M. (2007) The 33rd Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture—Cognitive Neuropsychiatry and Delusional Belief. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1041-1062.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701338071
 
[14]Coltheart, M. (2010) The Neuropsychology of Delusions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 16-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05496.x
 
[15]Corlett, P.R., Aitken, M.R.F., Dickinson, A., Shanks, D.R., Honey, G.D., Honey, R.A.E., Robbins, T.W., Bullmore, E.T. and Fletcher, P.C. (2004) Prediction Error during Retrospective Revaluation of Causal Associations in Humans: fMRI Evidence in Favour of an Associative Model of Learning. Neuron, 44, 877-888.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.022
 
[16]Devinsky, O. (2009) Delusional Misidentifications and Duplications Right Brain Lesions, Left Brain Delusions. Neurology, 72, 80-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000338625.47892.74
 
[17]Festinger, L.A. (1957) Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
 
[18]Fletcher, P.C., Anderson, J.M., Shanks, D.R., Honey, R., Carpenter, T.A., Donovan, T., Papadakis, N. and Bullmore, E.T. (2001) Responses of Human Frontal Cortex to Surprising Events Are Predicted by Formal Associative Learning Theory. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1043-1048.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn733
 
[19]Friston, K. (2010) The Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127-138.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
 
[20]Langdon, R. and Coltheart, M. (2000) The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Delusions. Mind & Language, 15, 184-218.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00129
 
[21]Seitz, R.J. and Angel, H.F. (2012) Processes of Believing—A Review and Conceptual Account. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 23, 303-309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2012-0034
 
[22]Turner, D.C., Aitken, M.R.F., Shanks, D.R., Sahakian, B.J., Robbins, T.W., Schwarzbauer, C. and Fletcher, P.C. (2004) The Role of the Lateral Frontal Cortex in Causal Associative Learning: Exploring Preventative and Super-Learning. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 872-880.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh046
 
[23]Cabeza, R. and Nyberg, L. (2000) Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137585
 
[24]Decety, J. and Chaminade, T. (2003) Neural Correlates of Feeling Sympathy. Neuropsychologia, 41, 127-138.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00143-4
 
[25]Gray, J.R., Braver, T.S. and Raichle, M.E. (2002) Integration of Emotion and Cognition in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 4115-4120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062381899
 
[26]Seitz, R.J., Schafer, R., Scherfeld, D., Friederichs, S., Popp, K., Wittsack, H.J., Azari, N.P. and Franz, M. (2008) Valuating Other People’s Emotional Face Expression: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalography Study. Neuroscience, 152, 713-722.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.10.066
 
[27]Rolls, E.T. (2006) Brain Mechanisms Underlying Flavour and Appetite. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 1123-1136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1852
 
[28]Schaefer, A. and Gray, J.R. (2007) A Role for the Human Amygdala in Higher Cognition. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 18, 355-363.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/revneuro.2007.18.5.355
 
[29]Angel, H.F. (2015) Die Creditive Basis wirtschaftlichen Handelns. Zur wirtschaftsanthropologischen Bedeutung von Glaubensprozessen. In: Dierksmeier, C., Hemel, U. and Manemann, J., Eds., Wirtschaftsanthropologie, NOMOS, Baden-Baden.
 
[30]Gettier, E.L. (1963) Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121
 
[31]Goel, V. and Dolan, R.J. (2003) Explaining Modulation of Reasoning by Belief. Cognition, 87, B11-B22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00185-3
 
[32]Angel, H.F. (2006) Religiositat als menschliches Potential. Ein anthropologisches Modell im neurowissenschaftlichen Horizont. In: Angel, H.F., Broking-Bortfeldt, M., Hemel, U., Kunstmann, J., Jakobs, M., Pirner, M.L. and Rothgangel, M., Eds., Religiositat, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, 62-89.
 
[33]Angel, H.F. (2013) Credition, the Process of Belief. In: Runehov, A.L.C. and Oviedo, L., Eds., Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, Springer, Dordrecht, 536-539.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_1565
 
[34]Morewedge, C.K. and Kahneman, D. (2010) Associative Processes in Intuitive Judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 435-440.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004
 
[35]Nelissen, K., Borra, E., Gerbella, M., Rozzi, S., Luppino, G., Vanduffel, W., Rizzolatti, G. and Orban, G.A. (2011) Action Observation Circuits in the Macaque Monkey Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3743-3756.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4803-10.2011
 
[36]Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. and Gallese, V. (2001) Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying the Understanding and Imitation of Action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35090060
 
[37]Zamboni, G., Gozzi, M., Krueger, F., Duhamel, J.R., Sirigu, A. and Grafman, J. (2009) Individualism, Conservatism, and Radicalism as Criteria for Processing Political Beliefs: A Parametric fMRI Study. Social Neuroscience, 4, 367-383.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470910902860308
 
[38]Krueger, F., Barbey, A.K. and Grafman, J. (2009) The Medial Prefrontal Cortex Mediates Social Event Knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 103-109.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.005
 
[39]Barsalou, L.W. (2009) Simulation, Situated Conceptualization, and Prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1281-1289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
 
[40]Seitz, R.J., Franz, M. and Azari, N.P. (2009) Value Judgments and Self-Control of Action: The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex. Brain Research Reviews, 60, 368-378.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.02.003
 
[41]Frith, C.D., Blakemore, S.J. and Wolpert, D.M. (2000) Abnormalities in the Awareness and Control of Action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 355, 1771-1788.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0734
 
[42]Hebb, D.O. (1949) The Organization of Behaviour. Wiley & Sons, New York.
 
[43]Sugiura, M. (2011) The Multi-Layered Model of Self: A Social Neuroscience Perspective. In: Kawashima, R., Sugiura, M. and Tsukiura, T., Eds., New Frontiers in Social Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University Press, Sendai, 111-135.
 
[44]Sugiura, M. (2013) Associative Account of Self-Cognition: Extended Forward Model and Multi-Layer Structure. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 535.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00535
 
[45]Piaget, J. (1928) The Child’s Conception of the World. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
 
[46]Seitz, R.J., Nickel, J. and Azari, N.P. (2006) Functional Modularity of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex: Involvement in Human Empathy. Neuropsychology, 20, 743-751.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.743
 
[47]Walsh, V. and Rushworth, M. (1999) A Primer of Magnetic Stimulation as a Tool for Neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia, 37, 125-135.
 
[48]Klucharev, V., Munneke, M.A.M., Smidts, A. and Fernandez, G. (2011) Downregulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex Prevents Social Conformity. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 11934-11940.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1869-11.2011
 
[49]Rushworth, M.F.S., Hadland, K.A., Paus, T. and Sipila, P.K. (2002) Role of the Human Medial Frontal Cortex in Task Switching: A Combined fMRI and TMS Study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 2577-2592.
 
[50]Sakai, K. and Passingham, R.E. (2003) Prefrontal Interactions Reflect Future Task Operations. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 75-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn987
 
[51]Sugiura, M., Friston, K.J., Willmes, K., Shah, N.J., Zilles, K. and Fink, G.R. (2007) Analysis of Intersubject Variability in Activation: An Application to the Incidental Episodic Retrieval during Recognition Test. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 49-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20256
 
[52]Badre, D. (2008) Cognitive Control, Hierarchy, and the Rostro-Caudal Organization of the Frontal Lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 193-200.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.004
 
[53]Koechlin, E. and Summerfield, C. (2007) An Information Theoretical Approach to Prefrontal Executive Function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 229-235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.005
 
[54]Seitz, R.J. and Angel, H.F. (2014) Psychology of Religion and Spirituality: Meaning-Making and Processes of Believing. Religion, Brain & Behaviour, 22-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.891249                                                             eww150115lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文