Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53213#.VLcp9MnQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53213#.VLcp9MnQrzE
Author(s)
Keng Bin Loke1*, Ab. Saman Abd. Kader2, Mohd. Zamani Ahmad2, Saharuddin Abdul Hamid1, Mohamad Rosni Othman1
Affiliation(s)
1School of Maritime Business and Management, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia.
2Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
2Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
ABSTRACT
Globalization
push container terminal grown rapidly in decade. To fulfill the future
traffic requirement, this study highlights marginal expansion planning
of infrastructure in a container terminal. By using marginal approach,
the expansion plan can be determine correctly and economically stage by
stage. A mathematical model has generated to calculate the expansion
size, expansion time, interval of expansion, expansion cost, and
significant of expansion for each infrastructure respectively. It
recommended determining the expansion plan for each infrastructure
respectively. This is because one of the infrastructures needs to be
expanding but the other may not. The generated model was verified with
others model and validated with case study to investigate the
practicability of the model. The model serves as expansion decision
making tools to assist port expansion planners.
KEYWORDS
Infrastructure, Marginal Approach, Expansion Plan, Mathematical Model, Expansion Size, Expansion Time
Cite this paper
References
Loke,
K. , Kader, A. , Ahmad, M. , Hamid, S. and Othman, M. (2015) Marginal
Expansion Planning of Infrastructure at a Container Terminal. Open Journal of Marine Science, 5, 99-107. doi: 10.4236/ojms.2015.51009.
[1] | UNCTAD (1985) Port Development—A Handbook for Planners in Developing Countries. UNITED NATIONS, New York, 227. |
[2] | Frankel, E.G. (1987) Port Planning and Development. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 795. |
[3] | Kader, A.S.A. (1997) Cost Modelling for Inland Waterway Transport Systems. Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, 276. |
[4] | Kendra, J.M. (1997) Seaport Development versus Environmental Preservation: The Case of Sears Island, Maine, USA. Marine Policy, 21, 409-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00004-3 |
[5] | Thomas, B.J. (1999) Improving Port Performance—Container Terminal Development. Proceedings of the Trade and Development and Swedish International Development Authority, United Nation. |
[6] | Niswari, A. (2005) Container Terminal Expansion to Build Capacity: A Case Study. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 73. |
[7] | Mohd Zamani, A. (2006) The Application of Fuzzy Expert System to Preliminary Development Planning of Medium Size Container Terminal. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, 355. |
[8] | Dekker, S. and Verhaeghe, R.J. (2008) Development of a Strategy for Port Expansion: An Optimal Control Approach. Maritime Economic and Logistics, 2008, 258-274 |
[9] | Thomas, B.J. and Roach, D.K., Interface4 Ltd., International Labour Office (1994) A Project by the International Labour Office (ILO), Financed by the Royal Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Port Development Programme, C.1.1 Container Terminal Operations. 56. |
[10] | Fawcett, S.E., Ellram, L.M. and Ogden, J.A. (2007) Supply Chain Management Form Visio to Implementation. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey, 530. |
[11] | Loke, K.B., Saharuddin, A.H., Ibrahim, A.R. and Rizal, I. (2004) Container Handling Efficiency. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Marine Technology, Malaysia. eww150115lx |
评论
发表评论