Evaluation of Reproductive Characteristics of 21 Highly Inbred Lines of White Leghorns Divergently Selected for or Segregating in Tumor Resistance
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53169#.VLcvk8nQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53169#.VLcvk8nQrzE
ABSTRACT
Reproduction
performance of 21 inbred experimental lines of White Leghorns was
evaluated based on samples of reproduction records over a period of
eight consecutive years. Two lines (63 and 72) have been extensively
used in studies, especially in research seeking for genetic and
epigenetic factors underlying resistance to avian tumor virus-induced
diseases in chickens. The other 19 lines are recombinant congenic
strains (RCS), which were generated by crossing lines 63 and 72 followed
by two consecutive backcrosses to the line 63 and then full-sib mating.
In theory, each RCS processes 7/8 of progenitor background line 63
genome and a random sample (1/8) of the progenitor donor line 72 genome.
All 21 inbred lines share a common major histocompatibility complex
haplotype, B*2. The estimated average fertility of the 21 inbred lines
ranged from 72.9% (RCS-J) up to 96.8% (RCS-P). Both progenitor lines 63
and 72 were observed with lower average fertility (82.4% and 81.6%,
respectively) in comparison with the RCS except the RCS-J, suggesting a
substantial polygenic component underlying the fertility phenotype. The
average embryo mortality rate ranged from 14.5% (RCS-P) up to 47.0%
(RCS-M). The background line 63 fell at about the middle of the range
(28.3%) significantly higher than the donor line 72 (15.7%), which was
among the group with the lowest embryo mortality. By definition,
hatchability of fertile eggs is reversely correlated with embryo
mortality. The average hatchability ranged from 26.5% (RCS-M) up to
66.8% (line 72) while the background line 63 remained (46.6%) at about
the middle of the range. The variability of the average embryo mortality
and hatchability observed among the 21 inbred lines indicated the two
correlated traits also follow polygenic models of inheritance. Findings
from this study paves the way for further investigation on genetic and
environmental influence over reproductive performance of inbred lines of
chickens, and particularly in understanding and improving the
reproduction fitness of invaluable genetic resources like these inbred
lines.
KEYWORDS
White Leghorns, Inbred Lines, Recobinant Congenic Strains, Fertility, Embryo Mortality, Hatchabiity, Polygentic Inheritance
Cite this paper
References
Kulkarni,
G. and Zhang, H. (2015) Evaluation of Reproductive Characteristics of
21 Highly Inbred Lines of White Leghorns Divergently Selected for or
Segregating in Tumor Resistance. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 5, 59-70. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2015.51008.
[1] | King’ori, A.M. (2011) Review of the Factors That Influence Egg Fertility and Hatchabilty in Poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10, 483-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.483.492 |
[2] | Sapp,
R.L., Rekaya, R., Misztal, I. and Wing, T. (2004) Male and Female
Fertility and Hatchability in Chickens: A Longitudinal Mixed Model
Approach. Poultry Science, 83, 1253-1259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.8.1253 |
[3] | Stromberg, J. (1975) A Guide to Better Hatching. Stromberg Publ. Co., Iowa, 8-25. |
[4] | Wright,
D., Rubin, C., Schutz, K., Kerje, S., Kindmark, A., Brandstrom, H.,
Andersson, L., Pizzari, T. and Jensen, P. (2012) Onset of Sexual
Maturity in Female Chickens Is Genetically Linked to Loci Associated
with Fecundity and a Sexual Ornament. Reproduction in Domestic Animals,
47, 31-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01963.x |
[5] | Brah,
G.S., Sandhu, J.S. and Chaudhary, M.L. (1991) Heritability Estimates of
Components of Incubation Mortality in White Leghorns. British Poultry
Science, 32, 871-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417412 |
[6] | Lush, J.L. (1945) Animal Breeding Plans. 3rd Edition, Iowa State College Press, Ames. |
[7] | Jimenez,
J.A., Hughes, K.A., Alaks, G., Graham, L. and Lacy, R.C. (1994) An
Experimental Study of Inbreeding Depression in a Natural Habitat.
Science, 266, 271-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7939661 |
[8] | Nordskog, A.W. and Cheng, S. (1988) Inbreeding Effects on Fertility and Hatchability Associated with the Formation of Sublines. Poultry Science, 67, 859-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0670859 |
[9] | Woodard,
A.E., Abplanalp, H., Pisenti, J.M. and Snyder, L.R. (1983) Inbreeding
Effects on Reproductive Traits in the Ring-Necked Pheasant. Poultry
Science, 62, 1725-1730. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0621725 |
[10] | MacNeil,
M.D. (2009) Invited Review: Research Contributions from Seventy-Five
Years of Breeding Line 1 Hereford Cattle at Miles City, Montana. Journal
of Animal Science, 87, 2489-2501. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1909 |
[11] | Charlesworth, D. and Willis, J.H. (2009) The Genetics of Inbreeding Depression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 783-796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2664 |
[12] | Woodard, A.E., Abplanalp, H. and Snyder, L. (1982) Inbreeding Depression in the Red-Legged Partridge. Poultry Science, 61, 1579-1584. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0611579 |
[13] | Cahaner, A. and Hillel, J. (1980) Estimating Heritability and Genetic Correlation between Traits from Generations F2 and F3 of Self-Fertilizing Species: A Comparison of Three Methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 58, 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00264666 |
[14] | Bacon,
L.D., Hunt, H.D. and Cheng, H.H. (2000) A Review of the Development of
Chicken Lines to Resolve Genes Determining Resistance to Diseases.
Poultry Science, 79, 1082-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1082 |
[15] | Abplanalp, H., Sato, K., Napolitano, D. and Reid, J. (1992) Reproductive Performance of Inbred Congenic Leghorns Carrying Different Haplotypes for the Major Histocompatibility Complex. Poultry Science, 71, 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710009 |
[16] | Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Edition, Longman Group Ltd., London. |
[17] | Threadgill,
D.W., Miller, D.R., Churchill, G.A. and de Villena, F.P. (2011) The
Collaborative Cross: A Recombinant Inbred Mouse Population for the
Systems Genetic Era. ILAR Journal, 52, 24-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ilar.52.1.24 |
[18] | Abplanalp, H. (1992) Inbred Lines as Genetic Resources of Chickens. Poultry Science, 4, 29-39. |
[19] | Sasakura, Y., Inaba, K., Satoh, N., Kondo, M. and Akasaka, K. (2009) Ciona intestinalis and Oxycomanthus japonicus, Representatives of Marine Invertebrates. Experimental Animals, 58, 459-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.58.459 |
[20] | Stone, H.A. (1975) Use of Highly Inbred Chickens in Research. USDA Agriculture Research Service Technical Bulletin No. 1514, Washington DC. |
[21] | Driver, J.P., Chen, Y.G. and Mathews, C.E. (2012) Comparative Genetics: Synergizing Human and NOD Mouse Studies for Identifying Genetic Causation of Type 1 Diabetes. The Review of Diabetic Studies, 9, 169-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2012.9.169 |
[22] | SAS (2014) JMP® 11. 2nd Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary. |
[23] | Zhou,
H. and Lamont, S.J. (1999) Genetic Characterization of Biodiversity in
Highly Inbred Chicken Lines by Microsatellite Markers. Animal Genetics,
30, 256-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.1999.00505.x |
[24] | Waters, N.F. and Fontes, A.K. (1960) Genetic Response of Inbred Lines of Chickens to Rous Sarcoma Virus. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 25, 351-357. |
[25] | Waters, N.F. (1945) Breeding for Resistance and Susceptibility to Avian Lymphomatosis. Poultry Science, 24, 259-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0240259 |
[26] | Chang, S., Dunn, J.R., Heidari, M., Lee, L.F., Song, J., Ernst, C.W., Ding, Z., Bacon, L.D. and Zhang, H. (2010) Genetics and Vaccine Efficacy: Host Genetic Variation Affecting Marek’s Disease Vaccine Efficacy in White Leghorn Chickens. Poultry Science, 89, 2083-2091. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00740 |
[27] | Bacon, L.D., Hunt, H.D. and Cheng, H.H. (2001) Genetic Resistance to Marek’s Disease. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 255, 121-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56863-3_5 |
[28] | Bacon, L.D., Fredericksen, T.L., Gilmour, D.G., Fadly, A.M. and Crittenden, L.B. (1985) Tests of Association of Lymphocyte Alloantigen Genotypes with Resistance to Viral Oncogenesis in Chickens. 2. Rous Sarcoma and Lymphoid Leukosis in Progeny Derived from 63 × 151 and 100 × 63 Crosses. Poultry Science, 64, 39-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0640039 |
[29] | Chang, S., Dunn, J.R., Heidari, M., Lee, L.F., Ernst, C., Song, J. and Zhang, H.M. (2012) Vaccine by Chicken Line Interaction Alters the Protective Efficacy against Challenge with a Very Virulent Plus Strain of Marek’s Disease Virus in White Leghorn Chickens. World Journal of Vaccines, 2, 1-11. |
[30] | Chang, S., Xie, Q., Dunn, J.R., Ernst, C.W., Song, J. and Zhang, H.M. (2014) Host Genetic Resistance to Marek’s Disease Sustains Protective Efficacy of Herpesvirus of Turkey in Both Experimental and Commercial Lines of Chickens. Vaccine, 32, 1820-1827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.092 |
[31] | Dennis,
R., Zhang, H.M., Bacon, L.D., Estevez, I. and Cheng, H.W. (2004)
Behavioral and Physiological Features of Chickens Diversely Selected for
Resistance to Avian Disease. 1. Selected Inbred Lines Differ in
Behavioral and Physical Responses to Social Stress. Poultry Science, 83,
1489-1496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.9.1489 |
[32] | Dennis, R., Zhang, H.M. and Cheng, H.W. (2006) Effect of Selection for Resistance and Susceptibility to Viral Diseases on Concentrations of Dopamine and Immunological Parameters in Six-Week-Old Chickens. Poultry Science, 85, 2135-2140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.12.2135 |
[33] | Zhang,
H.M., Hunt, H.D., Kulkarni, G.B., Palmquist, D.E. and Bacon, L.D.
(2006) Lymphoid Organ Size Varies among Inbred Lines 63 and 72 and Their
Thirteen Recombinant Congenic Strains of Chickens with the Same Major
Histocompatibility Complex. Poultry Science, 85, 844-853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.5.844 |
[34] | Luo, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, H., Tian, F., Chang, S., Cheng, H.H. and Song, J. (2011) Down-Regulation of Promoter Methylation Level of CD4 Gene after MDV Infection in MD-Susceptible Chicken Line. BMC Proceedings, 5, S7. |
[35] | Luo, J., Yu, Y., Chang, S., Tian, F., Zhang, H.M. and Song, J. (2012) DNA Methylation Fluctuation Induced by Virus Infection Differs between MD-Resistant and -Susceptible Chickens. Frontiers in Genetics, 3, 20. |
[36] | Luo, J., Mitra, A., Tian, F., Chang, S., Zhang, H.M., Cui, K., Yu, Y., Zhao, K. and Song, J. (2012) Histone Methylation Analysis and Pathway Predictions in Chickens after MDV Infection. PLOS ONE, 7, e41849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041849 |
[37] | Muir,
W.M., Wong, G.K., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Groenen, M.A., Crooijmans, R.P.,
Megens, H.J., Zhang, H., Okimoto, R., Vereijken, A., Jungerius, A.,
Albers, G.A., Lawley, C.T., Delany, M.E., Maceachern, S. and Cheng, H.H.
(2008) Genome-Wide Assessment of Worldwide Chicken SNP Genetic
Diversity Indicates Significant Absence of Rare Alleles in Commercial
Breeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 105, 17312-17317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806569105 |
[38] | Yu, Y., Zhang, H., Tian, F., Zhang, W., Fang, H. and Song, J. (2008) An Integrated Epigenetic and Genetic Analysis of DNA Methyltransferase Genes (DNMTs) in Tumor Resistant and Susceptible Chicken Lines. PLOS One, 3, e2672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002672 |
[39] | Yu, Y., Zhang, H., Tian, F., Bacon, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W. and Song, J. (2008) Quantitative Evaluation of DNA Methylation Patterns for ALVE and TVB Genes in a Neoplastic Disease Susceptible and Resistant Chicken Model. PLOS One, 3, e1731. |
[40] | Yu, Y., Luo, J., Mitra, A., Chang, S., Tian, F., Zhang, H., Yuan, P., Zhou, H. and Song, J. (2011) Temporal Transcriptome Changes Induced by MDV in Marek’s Disease-Resistant and -Susceptible Inbred Chickens. BMC Genomics, 12, 501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-501 |
[41] | Shapiro, L.S. (2001) The Poultry Industry. In: Stewart Jr., C.E., Yarnell, D., Linsner, K., Yehle, K. and Dalberg, L., Eds., Introduction to Animal Science, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 379-426. |
[42] | Wolc, A., White, I.M., Olori, V.E. and Hill, W.G. (2009) Inheritance of Fertility in Broiler Chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution, 41, 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-47 |
[43] | Bakst, M.R. and Bahr, J.M. (1993) Poultry. In: Hafez, E.S.E., Ed., Reproduction in Farm Animals, Lea & Febiger, Malvern, 385-402. |
[44] | Sewalem,
A. and Wilhelmson, M. (1999) Genetic Study of Embryonic Mortality in
White Leghorn Lines Selected for Egg Production Traits. British Poultry
Science, 40, 467-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669987214 |
[45] | Field, T.G. and Taylor, R.E. (2012) Scientific Farm Animal Production: An Introduction to Animal Science. 10th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Boston. |
[46] | Sato, K., Abplanalp, H., Napolitano, D. and Reid, J. (1992) Effects of Heterozygosity of Major Histocompatibility Complex Haplotypes on Performance of Leghorn Hens Sharing a Common Inbred Background. Poultry Science, 71, 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710018 eww150115lx |
评论
发表评论