跳至主要内容

Effects of Whole-Tree Harvesting on Species Composition of Tree and Understory Communities in a Northern Hardwood Forest

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53544#.VMiF5SzQrzE

ABSTRACT
In the northeastern United States, whole-tree harvesting is widely used to supply fuel to biomass energy facilities, but questions remain regarding its long-term sustainability. We have previously reported findings indicating no short-term decrease in forest productivity in whole-tree harvested sites when compared with similar conventionally (stem-only) harvested sites. Here we present additional results of the same study, but focus on the effect harvest treatment has on the species composition of the regenerating forest. Within northern hardwood forests in central New Hampshire and western Maine, regeneration surveys were conducted on four (4) small clearcuts in 2010 and twenty-nine (29) small clearcuts in 2011. The species and diameter of trees > 2 m in height were recorded within 1 m or 2 m-radius plots and used to calculate the biomass fraction of each species. The 2010 study additionally measured the density of trees < 2 m in height and the diversity of understory non-tree species. Non-metric multidimensional scaling and multi-response permutation procedures were used to determine the effect of harvest treatment had on community-wide tree species composition. Potential differences were also examined on a species-by-species basis. Both analytic methods indicated no significant differences in species composition of tree species or understory communities. Within the limits of our data, we conclude that no significant effects of residue removal on species composition are observed within our sample of northern hardwood sites at this early stage of stand development.
 
Cite this paper
Roxby, G. , Howard, T. and Lee, T. (2015) Effects of Whole-Tree Harvesting on Species Composition of Tree and Understory Communities in a Northern Hardwood Forest. Open Journal of Forestry, 5, 235-253. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2015.52021.
 
References
[1]Anderson, M. (1985). The Impact of Whole-Tree Harvesting in British Forests. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 79, 33-39.
 
[2]Benjamin, J. G., Lilieholm, R. J., & Damery, D. (2009). Challenges and Opportunities for the Northeastern Forest Bioindustry. Journal of Forestry, 107, 125-131.
 
[3]Bowman, J. C., Sleep, D., Forbes, G. J., & Edwards, M. (2000). The Association of Small Mammals with Coarse Woody Debris at Log and Stand Scales. Forest Ecology and Management, 129, 119-124.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00152-8
 
[4]Boyle, J. R. (1976). System for Evaluating Potential Impacts of Whole-Tree Harvesting on Site Quality. Tappi, 59, 79-81.
 
[5]Brakenhielm, S., & Liu, Q. (1998). Long-Term Effects of Clear-Felling on Vegetation Dynamics and Species Diversity in a Boreal Pine Forest. Biodiversity Conservation, 7, 207-220.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008836502640
 
[6]deMaynadier, P. G., & Hunter, M. L. J. (1995). The Relationship between Forest Management and Amphibian Ecology: A Review of the North American Literature. Environmental Reviews, 3, 230-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/a95-012
 
[7]Dyck, W. J., Hodgkiss, P. D., Oliver, G. R., & Mees, C. A. (1991). Harvesting Sand-Dune Forests: Impacts on Second-Rotation Productivity. In: W. J. Dyck, & C. A. Mees (Eds.), Long-Term Field Trials to Assess Environmental Impacts of Harvesting (pp. 163-176), Rotorua: Forest Research Institute.
 
[8]Egnell, G., & Valinger, E. (2003). Survival, Growth, and Growth Allocation of Planted Scots Pine Trees after Different Levels of Biomass Removal in Clear-Felling. Forest Ecology and Management, 177, 65-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00332-8
 
[9]Finzi, A. C., & Canham, C. D. (2000). Sapling Growth in Response to Light and Nitrogen Availability in a Southern New England Forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 131, 153-165.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00206-6
 
[10]Gotelli, N. J., & Ellison, A. M. (2004). A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
 
[11]Haines, A. (2011). Flora Novae Angliae. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
 
[12]Hendrickson, O. Q. (1988). Biomass and Nutrients in Regenerating Woody Vegetation Following Whole-Tree and Conventional Harvest in a Northern Mixed Forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 1427-1436.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x88-221
 
[13]Jenkins, J. C., Chojnacky, D. C., Heath, L. S., & Birdsey, R. A. (2004). Comprehensive Database of Diameter-Based Biomass Regressions for North American Tree Species. General Technical Report NE-319. Newtown Square, PA: USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, 45 p.
 
[14]Johnson, C. E., Johnson, A. H., & Siccama, T. G. (1991). Whole-Tree Clear-Cutting Effects on Exchangeable Cations and Soil Acidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55, 502-508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020035x
 
[15]Kimmins, J. P. (1977). Evaluation of Consequences for Future Tree Productivity of Loss of Nutrients in Whole-Tree Harvesting. Forest Ecology and Management, 1, 169-183.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(76)90019-0
 
[16]Leak, W. B. (1976). Relation of Tolerant Species to Habitat in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-351. Newtown Square, PA: USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
 
[17]Leak, W. B. (1978). Relationship of Species and Site Index to Habitat in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-397. Newtown Square, PA: USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
 
[18]Lee, T. D., Barrett, J. P., & Hartman, B. (2005). Elevation, Substrate, and the Potential for Climate-Induced Tree Migration in the White Mountains, New Hampshire, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 212, 75-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.007
 
[19]Loeb, S. C. (1999). Responses of Small Mammals to Coarse Woody Debris in a Southeastern Pine Forest. Journal of Mammalogy, 80, 460-471.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1383293
 
[20]Logan, K. T. (1965). Growth of Tree Seedlings as Affected by Light Intensity I. White Birch, Yellow Birch, Sugar Maple and Silver Maple. Canadian Department of Forestry Publication No 1121, 16 p.
 
[21]Lohr, S. M., Gauthreaux, S. A., & Kilgo, J. C. (2002). Importance of Coarse Woody Debris to Avian Communities in Loblolly Pine Forests. Conservation Biology, 16, 767-777.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01019.x
 
[22]Lyons, J. B., Bothner, W. A., Moench, R. H., & Thompson Jr., J. B. (1997). Bedrock Geologic Map of New Hampshire. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geologic Survey.
 
[23]Mann, L. K. (1984). First-Year Regeneration in Upland Hardwoods after Two Levels of Residue Removal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 14, 336-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x84-062
 
[24]McClure, J.W., & Lee, T.D. (1993). Small-Scale Disturbance in a Northern Hardwoods Forest: Effect on Tree Species Abundance and Distribution. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 1347-1360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x93-172
 
[25]McCune, B., & Mefford, M. J. (1999). Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4.0. Glenden Beach, OR: MJM Software Design.
 
[26]McDonald, R. I., Motzkin, G., & Foster, D. R. (2008). The Effect of Logging on Vegetation Composition in Western Massachusetts. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 4021-4031.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.054
 
[27]Olivero, A. M., & Hix, D. M. (1998). Influence of Aspect and Stand Age on Ground Flora of Southeastern Ohio Forest Ecosystems. Plant Ecology, 139, 177-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009758501201
 
[28]Olsson, B. A., Bengtsson, J., & Lundkvist, H. (1996a). Effects of Different Forest Harvest Intensities on the Pools of Exchangeable Cations in Coniferous Forest Soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 84, 135-147.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(96)03730-9
 
[29]Olsson, B. A., Staaf, H., Lundkvist, H., Bengtsson, J., & Rosen, K. (1996b). Carbon and Nitrogen in Coniferous Forest Soils after Clear-Felling and Harvests of Different Intensity. Forest Ecology and Management, 82, 19-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03697-0
 
[30]Pelletier, G. (2011). SolRad—A Solar Position and Solar Radiation Calculator for Excel/VBA.
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/eap/models.html
 
[31]Perala, D. A., & Alm, A. A. (1990). Reproductive Ecology of Birch: A Review. Forest Ecology and Management, 32, 1-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(90)90104-J
 
[32]Proe, M. F., Cameron, A. D., Dutch, J., & Christodoulou, X. C. (1996). The Effect of Whole-Tree Harvesting on the Growth of Second Rotation Sitka Spruce. Forestry, 69, 389-401.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/forestry/69.4.389
 
[33]Proe, M. F., Griffiths, J. H., & McKay, H. M. (2001). Effect of Whole-Tree Harvesting on Microclimate during Establishment of Second Rotation Forestry. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 110, 141-154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00285-4
 
[34]Roxby, G., & Howard, T. (2013) Whole-Tree Harvesting and Site Productivity: Twenty-Nine Northern Hardwood Sites in Central New Hampshire and Western Maine. Forest Ecology and Management, 293, 114-121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.046
 
[35]Saarsalmi, A., Tamminen, P., Kukkola, M., & Hautajarvi, R. (2010). Whole-Tree Harvesting at Clear-Felling: Impact on Soil Chemistry, Needle Nutrient Concentrations and Growth of Scots Pine. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25, 148-156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581003667314
 
[36]Sanchez, F. G., Scott, D. A., & Ludovici, K. H. (2006). Negligible Effects of Severe Organic Matter Removal and Soil Compaction on Loblolly Pine Growth over 10 Years. Forest Ecology and Management, 227, 145-154.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.015
 
[37]Scott, D. A., & Dean, T. J. (2006). Energy Trade-Offs between Intensive Biomass Utilization, Site Productivity Loss, and Ameliorative Treatments in Loblolly Pine Plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30, 1001-1010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.12.014
 
[38]Smethurst, P. J., & Nambiar, E. K. S. (1990). Effects of Slash and Litter Management on Fluxes of Nitrogen and Tree Growth in a Young Pinus radiata Plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 1498-1507.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x90-198
 
[39]Tan, X., Curran, M., Chang, S., & Maynard, D. (2009). Early Growth Responses of Lodgepole Pine and Douglas-Fir to Soil Compaction, Organic Matter Removal, and Rehabilitation Treatments in Southeastern British Columbia. Forest Science, 55, 210-220.
 
[40]Vanguelova, E., Pitman, R., Luiro, J., & Helmisaari, H. S. (2010). Long Term Effects of Whole Tree Harvesting on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Sustainability in the UK. Biogeochemistry, 101, 43-59.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9511-9
 
[41]Walmsley, J. D., Jones, D. L., Reynolds, B., Price, M. H., & Healey, J. R. (2009). Whole Tree Harvesting Can Reduce Second Rotation Forest Productivity. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1104-1111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.015                                                                    eww150128lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文