Does the Location of the Cutting Flute of Self-Tapping Screws in Bony Substrate Affect the Removal Torque?
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53122#.VLXQ0snQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53122#.VLXQ0snQrzE
Affiliation(s)
1Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
2Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
3Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, Australia.
2Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
3Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, Australia.
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
An observation was made that when removing self-tapping cortical screws
from patients bones, stripping or shearing of the head of the screw
occurred more often in screws whose cutting flutes sat in cortical bone
compared with screws that had penetrated the distal cortex with flutes
exposed. Method: A model was designed to simulate screws with their
cutting flutes either in contact with cortical bone or deep to cortical
bone. Screws were grouped depending on the location of their cutting
flutes and removal torque was measured. Results: Eighteen screws were
included in final analysis. There was a statistically significant
difference in average initial removal torque and average maximal removal
torque with screws with their cutting flutes in substrate requiring
significantly more torque to remove. Conclusion: We conclude that
self-tapping cortical screws whose cutting flutes sit in cortical
substrate require more torque to remove and are therefore more likely to
fail. This finding may be used as a guide in pre-operative planning for
removal of metalwork from patients.
Cite this paper
References
Graham,
D. , Spiers, A. , Swarts, E. and Whitewood, C. (2015) Does the Location
of the Cutting Flute of Self-Tapping Screws in Bony Substrate Affect
the Removal Torque?. Open Journal of Orthopedics, 5, 1-5. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2015.51001.
| [1] | Canale, S. and Beaty, J. (2007) Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 11th Edition, Mosby/Elsevier, USA. |
| [2] | Ansell,
R. and Scales, J. (1968) A Study of Some Fractures Which Affect the
Strength of Screws and Their Insertion and Holding Power in Bone.
Journal of Biomechanics, 1, 279-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(68)90023-7 |
| [3] | Baumgart, F.W., Morikawa, C.K., Morikawa, S.M., et al. (1993) AO/ASIF Self-Tapping Screws (STS). AO/ASIF Research Institute, Davos. |
| [4] | Busam, M.L., Esther, R.J. and Obremskey, W.T. (2006) Hardware Removal: Indications and Expectations. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 14, 113-120. |
| [5] | Jamil,
W., Allami, M., Choudhury, M.Z., Mann, C., Bagga, T. and Roberts, A.
(2008) Do Orthopaedic Surgeons Need a Policy on the Removal of
Metalwork? A Descriptive National Survey of Practicing Surgeons in the
United Kingdom. Injury International Journal of the Care of the Injured,
39, 362-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.10.028 |
| [6] | Jago, E.R. and Hindley, C.J. (1998) The Removal of Metalwork in Children. Injury, 29, 439-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00080-1 |
| [7] | Webb,
J.A., Almaiyah, M., McVie, J. and Montgomery, R.J. (2008) Proximal
Femoral Osteotomies in Children Using the Richards Hip Screw:
Techniques, Outcome and Subsequent Removal. Journal of Children’s
Orthopaedics, 2, 417-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-008-0127-8 |
| [8] | Schatzker, J. (1995) Osseointegration of Metal. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 38, S49. |
| [9] | Hanser, D. and Jensen, J.S. (1992) Additional Mechanical Tests of Bone Cements. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 58, 268-271. |
| [10] | Rua,
J.Y., Ashman, R.B. and Turner, C.H. (1993) Young’s Modulus of
Trabecular and Cortical Bone Material: Ultrasonic and Microtensile
Measurements. Journal of Biomechanics, 26, 111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D eww150114lx |
评论
发表评论