跳至主要内容

Differential Susceptibility of Conyza bonariensis Biotypes to Glyphosate and ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides in Argentina

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=53010#.VK9E9cnQrzE

ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare control of three stages biotypes (rosette, bolting, and repro- ductive stage) of Conyza bonariensis glyphosate susceptible biotype (S) and tolerant biotype (T) to glyphosate with glyphosate and mixtures of acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting. For glyphosate, the dose-response curves confirmed that injury of the biotype T relative to biotype S was signifi- cantly lower for both rosette and bolting stages. Resistance index (RI) for this herbicide was approximately 4 for both weed stages. At bolting, for both biotypes doses much higher than the recommended dose were required. For acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides, at the rosette stage, control of both biotypes was excellent with doses significantly lower than the recommended rate. All herbicides within this group showed a very low I50 relative to the recommended rate. These results indicate that biotypes difficult to control with glyphosate at the rosette and bolting stage may be controlled using acetolacte synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides. Control for the reproductive stage was poor. A management program based on the combination of glyphosate with pre- and post-emergence acetolactate synthase (ALS) herbicides may be effective to control the weed.
 
Cite this paper
Puricelli, E. , Faccini, D. , Metzler, M. and Torres, P. (2015) Differential Susceptibility of Conyza bonariensis Biotypes to Glyphosate and ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides in Argentina. Agricultural Sciences, 6, 22-30. doi: 10.4236/as.2015.61003.
 
References
[1]Burkart, A. (1974) Flora Ilustrada de Entre Ríos (Argentina). Tomo VI. Colección Científica del INTA, Buenos Aires, 219-228.
 
[2]Tuesca, D. and Puricelli, E. (2007) Effect of Tillage Systems and Herbicide Treatments on Weed Abundance and Diversity in a Glyphosate Resistant Crop Rotation. Crop Protection, 26, 1765-1770.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.03.008
 
[3]Moseley, C.M. and Hagood Jr., E.S. (1990) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Full-Season No-Till Soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technology, 4, 814-818.
 
[4]Davis, V.M., Gibson, K.D., Bauman, T.T., Weller, S.C. and Johnson, W.G. (2007) Influence of Weed Management Practices and Crop Rotation on Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed Population Dynamics and Crop Yield. Weed Science, 55, 508-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-06-187.1
 
[5]Davis, V.M., Gibson, K.D., Bauman, T.T., Weller, S.C. and Johnson, W.G. (2009) Influence of Weed Management Practices and Crop Rotation on Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Population Dynamics and Crop Yield—Years 111 and 1V. Weed Science, 57, 417-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-006.1
 
[6]Buhler, D.D. and Owen, M.D.K. (1997) Emergence and Survival of Horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Science, 45, 98-101.
 
[7]Nandula, V.K., Eubank, T.W., Poston, D.H., Koger, C.H. and Reddy, K.N. (2006) Factors Affecting Germination of Horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Science, 54, 898-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-06-006R2.1
 
[8]Main, C.L., Steckel, L.E., Hayes, R.M. and Mueller, T.C. (2006) Biotic and Abiotic Factors Influence Horseweed Emergence. Weed Science, 54, 1101-1105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-06-026R1.1
 
[9]Puricelli, E. and Tuesca, D. (2005) Efecto del sistema de labranza sobre la dinámica de la comunidad de malezas en trigo y en barbechos de secuencias de cultivos resistentes a glifosato. Agriscientia, 2, 69-78.
 
[10]Shrestha, A., Hembree, K.J. and Va, N. (2007) Growth Stage Influences Level of Resistance in Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed. California Agriculture, 61, 67-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3733/ca.v061n02p67
 
[11]Sansom, M., Saborido, A. and Dubois, M. (2013) Control of Conyza spp. with Glyphosate—A Review of the Situation in Europe. Plant Protection Science, 49, 44-53.
 
[12]Heap, I. (2014) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com
 
[13]Urbano, J.M., Borrego, A., Torres, V., Leon, J.M., Jimenez, C., Dinelli, D. and Barnes, J. (2007) Glyphosate-Resistant Hairy Fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) in Spain. Weed Technology, 21, 396-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-096.1
 
[14]Dinelli, G., Marotti, I., Bonetti, A., Catizone, P., Urbano, J.M. and Barne, J. (2008) Physiological and Molecular Bases of Glyphosate Resistance in Conyza bonariensis Biotypes from Spain. Weed Research, 48, 257-265.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00623.x
 
[15]Travlos, I.S. and Chachalis, D. (2010) Glyphosate-Resistant Hairy Fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) Is Reported in Greece. Weed Technology, 24, 569-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-09-00080.1
 
[16]Vargas, L., Bianchi, M.A., Rizzardi, M.A., Gostinetto, D. and Dalmagro, T. (2007) Buva (Conyza bonariensis) resistente ao glyphosate na regiao sul do Brasil. Planta Daninha, 25, 573-578.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000300017
 
[17]Okada, M. and Jasieniuk, M. (2014) Inheritance of Glyphosate Resistance in Hairy Fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) from California. Weed Science, 62, 258-266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00111.1
 
[18]Devlin, D.L., Long, J.H. and Maddux, L.D. (1991) Using Reduced Rates of Postemergence Herbicides in Soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technology, 5, 843-840.
 
[19]Klingaman, T.E., King, C.A. and Oliver, R.L. (1991) Effect of Application Rate, Weed Species, and Weed Stage of Growth on Imazethapyr Activity. Weed Science, 40, 227-232.
 
[20]Blackshaw, E.B. and Harker, N. (1997) Scentless Chamomile (Matricaria perforata) Growth, Development, and Seed Production. Weed Science, 45, 701-705.
 
[21]Faccini, D. and Puricelli, E. (2007) Efficacy of Herbicide Dose and Plant Growth Stage on Weeds Present in Fallow Ground. Agriscientia, 24, 23-29.
 
[22]Vanlieshout, L.A. and Loux, M.M. (2000) Interactions of Glyphosate with Residual Herbicides in No-Till Soybean (Glycine max) Production. Weed Technology, 14, 480-487.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0480:IOGWRH]2.0.CO;2
 
[23]Shrestha, A., Hembree, K.J. and Va, N. (2007) Growth Stage Influences Level of Resistance in Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed. California Agriculture, 61, 67-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3733/ca.v061n02p67
 
[24]Soltani, N., Robinson, D.E., Tardif, F.J., Lawton, M.B. and Sikkema, P.H. (2013) Control of Glyphosate Resistant Canada Fleabane [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.] with Preplant Herbicide Tankmixes in Soybean [Glycine max (L). Merr.]. Canadian Journal Plant Science, 93, 659-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps2012-320
 
[25]Crespo, R.J., Bernards, M.L., Kruger, G., Lee, D. and Wilson, R. (2013) Response of Nebraska Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Populations to Dicamba. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5, 158-164.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n5p158
 
[26]Trainer, G.D., Loux, M.M., Harrison, S.K. and Regnier, E. (2005) Response of Horseweed Biotypes to Foliar Applications of Cloransulam-Methyl and Glyphosate. Weed Technology, 19, 231-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-127R3
 
[27]Santos, G., Oliveira Jr., R.S., Constantin, J., Francischini, A.C. and Osipe, J.B. (2014) Multiple Resistance of Conyza sumatrensis to Chlorimuronethyl and to Glyphosate. Planta Danhina, 32, 409-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582014000200019
 
[28]Davis, V.M., Kruger, G.R., Stachler, J.M., Loux, M.M. and Johnson, W.G. (2009b) Growth and Seed Production of Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Populations Resistant to Glyphosate, ALS-Inhibiting, and Multiple (Glyphosate + ALS-Inhibiting) Herbicides. Weed Science, 57, 494-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-024.1
 
[29]Seefeldt, S.S., Jensen, J.E. and Fuerst, E.P. (1995) Log Logistic Analysis of Herbicide Dose Response Relationships. Weed Technology, 9, 218-227.
 
[30]Knezevic, S.Z., Streibig, J.C. and Ritz, C. (2007) Utilizing R Software Package for Dose-Response Studies: The Concept and Data Analysis. Weed Technology, 21, 840-848.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-161.1
 
[31]Byker, H.P., Soltani, N., Robinson, D.E., Tardif, F.J., Lawton, M.B. and Sikkema, P.H. (2013) Glyphosate-Resistant Canada Fleabane [Conyza canadensis (L). Cronq.]: Dose Response to Glyphosate and Control with Postemergence Herbicides in Soybean in Ontario. Canadian Journal Plant Science, 93, 1187-1193. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-067
 
[32]Werth, J., Walker, S., Boucher, L. and Robinson, G. (2010) Applying the Double Knock Technique to Control Flaxleaf Fleabane (Conyza bonariensis). Weed Biology and Management, 10, 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2010.00360.x
 
[33]Wu, H., Walker, S., Robinson, G. and Coombes, N. (2010) Control of Flaxleaf Fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) in Wheat and Sorghum. Weed Technology, 24, 102-107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-09-043.1                                                                                   eww150109lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文