跳至主要内容

A New Explanation of K. J. Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem: On Conditions of Social Welfare Functions

Read  full  paper  at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52975#.VK8socnQrzE

Author(s) 

ABSTRACT
Social welfare function theory belongs to the cross disciplines of economics, sociology, management science and political science. The social welfare function conditions were first proposed by Kenneth Joseph Arrow, and served as the golden criteria in this field. For a long time, “the expressions of these conditions are not satisfactory”, as Arrow said himself, and he has continued to revise them. The author of this article has attempted to structure a mathematical expression that would meet Arrow’s conditions. We found that the conditions of “unrestricted domain” and “independent alternatives independence” could not always be expressed simultaneously. This led us to conduct further research on the relationships among Arrow’s conditions. We find that there are logical conflicts among some of these conditions, and we discuss these issues in this article.
 
Cite this paper
Yuan, Z. (2015) A New Explanation of K. J. Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem: On Conditions of Social Welfare Functions. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 26-39. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2015.51003.
 
References
[1]Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New Heaven, CT: Cowles Foundation, Yale University.
 
[2]Arrow, K. J. (1970). Social Choice and Individual Values (2nd ed.). New Heaven, CT: Cowles Foundation, Yale University.
 
[3]Arrow, K. J. (1983). Social Choice and Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
 
[4]Buchanan J. M., & Tullock, G. (1965) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
 
[5]Congleton, R. (2002). The Future of Public Choice. The Sixth International Conference in Public Choice, Japan, 21 July 2002.
 
[6]Mueller, D. C. (1979) Public Choice. London: Cambridge University Press.
 
[7]Mueller, D. C. (2003) Public Choice (3th ed.). London: Cambridge University Press.
 
[8]Sen, A. K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
 
[9]Vickrey, W. (1960). Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74, 507-535.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884349                                                                                       eww150109lx

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...