Trends of Shoreline Position: An Approach to Future Prediction for Balasore Shoreline, Odisha, India
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52454#.VJjJecCAM4
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52454#.VJjJecCAM4
Author(s)
The present study aims to analyze the
shift in shoreline due to coastal processes and formulate available for best
estimate of future shoreline positions based on precedent shorelines. Information
on rates and trends of shoreline change can be used to improve the
understanding of the underlying causes and potential effects of coastal erosion
which can support informed coastal management decisions. In this paper,
researchers go over the changes in the recent positions of the shoreline of the
Balasore coast for the 38 years from 1975 through 2013. The study area includes
the Balasore coastal region from Rasalpur to Udaypur together with Chandipur,
Choumukh, Chandrabali as well as Bichitrapur. Transects wise shoreline data
base were developed for approximately 67 kilometers of shoreline and
erosional/accretional scenario has also been analysed by delineating the
shoreline from Landsat imageries of 1975, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010
and 2013. A simple Linear Regression Model and End Point Rate (EPR) has been
adopted to take out the rate of change of shoreline and its future positions,
based on empirical observations at 67 transects along the Balasore coast. It is
found that the north eastern part of Balasore coast in the vicinity of
Subarnarekha estuary and Chandrabali beach undergo high rates of shore line
shift. The shoreline data were integrated for long- (about 17 years) and
short-term (about 7 years) shift rates analysis to comprehend the shoreline
change and prediction. For the prediction of future shoreline, the model has
been validated with the present shoreline position (2013). The rate of
shoreline movement calculated from the fixed base line to shoreline position of
1975, 1980, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010 and based on this, the estimated shoreline
of 2013 was calculated. The estimated shoreline was compared with the actual
shoreline delineated from satellite imagery of 2013. The model error or
positional shift at each sample points is observed. The positional error varies
from -4.82 m to 212.41 m. It has been found that model prediction error is
higher in the left hand side of river Subarnarekha. The overall error for the
entire predicted shoreline was found to be 41.88 m by Root Mean Square Error
(RMSE). In addition, it was tested by means difference between actual and
predicted shoreline positions using “t” test and it has been
found that predicted shore line is not significantly different from actual
shoreline position at (t132 = 0.278) p <
0.01.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Barman, N. , Chatterjee, S. and Khan, A. (2015)
Trends of Shoreline Position: An Approach to Future Prediction for
Balasore Shoreline, Odisha, India. Open Journal of Marine Science, 5, 13-25. doi: 10.4236/ojms.2015.51002.
| [1] | Lee, J. and Jurkevich, I. (1990) Coastline Detection and Tracing in SAR Images. IEEE Transactions in Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 28, 662-668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1990.572976 |
| [2] |
White, K. and El Asmar, H.
(1999) Monitoring Changing Position of Coastlines Using Thematic Mapper
Imagery, an Example from the Nile Delta. Geomorphology, 29, 93-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00008-2 |
| [3] | Bertacchini, E. and Capra, A. (2010) Map Updating and Coastline Control with Very High Resolution Satellite Images: Application to Molise and Puglia Coasts (Italy). Italian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42, 103-115. |
| [4] | Wright, H. and Pilkey, Jr., (1989) The Effect of Hard Stabilization upon Dry Beach Width. Proceedings of Coastal Zone ‘89, American Society of Civil Engineers. 676-790. |
| [5] | Basco, D. (1991) Boundary Conditions and Long Term Shoreline Change Rates for the Southern Virginia Ocean Coastline. Shore and Beach, 59, 8-13. |
| [6] | Paine, J. and Morton, R. (1989) Shoreline and Vegetation Line Movement, Texas Gulf Coast 1974 to 1982. The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic and Geology and Geological Circular, 89-1. 50. |
| [7] |
Siddiqui, M. and Maajid, S.
(2004) Monitoring of Geomorphological Changes for Planning Reclamation
Work in Coastal Area of Karachi, Pakistan. Advances in Space Research,
33, 1200-1205.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00373-9 |
| [8] | Fenster, M., Dolan, R. and Elder, J. (1993) A New Method for Predicting Shoreline Positions from Historical Data. Journal of Coastal Research, 9, 147-171. |
| [9] | Dolan, R., Fenster, M. and Holmes, S. (1991) Temporal Analysis of Shoreline Recession and Accretion. Journal of Coastal Research, 7, 723-744. |
| [10] |
Rissanen, J. (1978) Modeling by Shortest Data Description. Automatica, 14, 465-471.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5 |
| [11] | Douglas, B. and Crowell, M. (2000) Long-Term Shoreline Position Prediction and Error Propagation. Journal of Coastal Research, 16, 145-152. |
| [12] |
Maiti, S. and Bhattacharya, A.
(2009) Shoreline Change Analysis and Its Application to Prediction: A
Remote Sensing and Statistics Based Approach. Marine Geology, 257,
11-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2008.10.006 |
| [13] |
Ryu, J., Won, J. and Min, K.
(2002) Waterline Extraction from Landsat TM Data in a Tidal Flat: A Case
Study in Gosmo Bay, Korea. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 442-456.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00059-7 |
| [14] |
Eliot, J. and Clarke, D. (1989)
Temporal and Spatial Bias in the Estimation of Shoreline Rate-of-Change
Statistics from Beach Survey Information. Coastal Management, 17,
129-156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08920758909362081 |
| [15] | Li, R., Liu, J. and Felus, Y. (2001) Spatial Modelling and Analysis for Shoreline Change and Coastal Erosion Monitoring. Marine Geodesy, 24, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490410121502 |
| [16] | Thieler, E.R., O’Connell, J.F. and Schupp, C.A. (2001) The Massachusetts Shoreline Change Project—1800s to 1994. USGS Administrative Report to the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management, Boston, 26 p. |
| [17] | Himmelstoss, E.A. (2009) DSAS 4.0—Installation Instructions and User Guide. In: Thieler, E.R., Himmelstoss, E.A., Zichichi, J.L. and Ergul, A., Eds., The Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) Version 4.0—An ArcGIS Extension for Calculating Shoreline Change: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1278, ver. 4.2. 81 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1278/ eww141223lx |
评论
发表评论