跳至主要内容

Shallow-Water Origin of a Devonian Black Shale, Cleveland Shale Member (Ohio Shale), Northeastern Ohio, USA

Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52670#.VKC2jcCAM4

Author(s) 
Black shales are usually interpreted to require anoxic bottom waters and deeper water sedimentation. There has long been a debate about whether the Devonian Cleveland Shale Member of the Ohio Shale (CSM) was deposited in shallow- or deep-water depositional environments. This study looked at the CSM at 3 stratigraphic sections and 5 well cores in northeastern Ohio. The CSM mostly consists of sapropelite (interbedded carbonaceous black mudstones and gray calcareous claystones). The black and gray “shales” are rhythmically bedded at micro- (<1 cm thick), meso- (<10 cm thick) and macro-scales (10s of cm thick) and represent changes in organic matter content (ranging from 7% - 20% TOC). Three types of event layers are interbedded with the mudrocks: 1) tempestites, 2) proximal turbidites, and 3) hyperpycnites. Individual tempestites and turbidites are laterally continuous ≥35 km, while hyperpycnites are too thin (<1 cm) to trace laterally. Tempestites consist of hummocky stratified sandstones with groove casts and escape burrows overlain by planar laminated sandstones with wave ripples at the top. Tempestites average 13 cm thick, but can be amalgamated up to 45 cm thick, and are more common in the lower half of the unit. Turbidites are incomplete Bouma sequences that average 6 cm thick, show evidence of combined flow (“wave-modified turbidites”), and are more common toward the top of the unit. Hyperpycnites (density underflows from river discharge) consist of inverse-to-normal graded sandy or silty microlaminae that have been studied primarily by using petrography and SEM. Condensed sections in the CSM are probable firmgrounds with carbonate concretions, and indicate intervals of low sedimentation rates. The evidence shows that the CSM depositional environment was receiving siliciclastics from the northeast (e.g., Catskill delta), and that the coarser-grained clastic sediment was primarily transported as density underflows (turbidites and hyperpycnites). However, significant storm deposits (tempestites) within the CSM indicate erosion and redeposition occurred on a muddy clastic marine shelf at paleo-water depths less than storm-weather wave base (probably ≤50 m depth).
Cite this paper
Alshahrani, S. and Evans, J. (2014) Shallow-Water Origin of a Devonian Black Shale, Cleveland Shale Member (Ohio Shale), Northeastern Ohio, USA. Open Journal of Geology, 4, 636-653. doi: 10.4236/ojg.2014.412048
 

[1] Potter, P.E., Maynard, J.B. and Pryor, W.A. (1980) Sedimentology of Shale. Springer-Verlag, New York, 310 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9981-3
[2] Tissot, B.P. and Welte, D.H. (1978) Petroleum Formation and Occurrence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 538 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96446-6
[3] Schott, G.L., Overbey Jr., W.K., Hunt, A.E. and Komar, C.A. (1978) Document MERC/SP-77/5. 1st Eastern Gas Shales Symposium, U.S. Department of Energy, Morgantown Energy Research Center, 783 p.
[4] Ryder, R.T., Swezey, C.S., Crangle, R.D. and Trippi, M.H. (2008) Geologic Cross Section E-E’ through the Appalachian Basin from the Findlay Arch, Wood County, Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Pendleton County, West Virginia. Scientific Investigations Map 2985, U.S. Geological Survey, 53 p.
[5] Boyce, M.L. and Carr, T.R. (2009) Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Devonian Marcellus Interval in West Virginia and Southwestern Pennsylvania. AAPG Search and Discovery, Article ID: 90113.
[6] Didyk, B., Simoneit, B., Brassell, S. and Englinton, G. (1978) Organic Geochemical Indicators of Paleoenvironmental Conditions of Sedimentation. Nature, 272, 216-222.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/272216a0
[7] Tourelot, H. (1979) Black Shale: Its Deposition and Diagenesis. Clays and Clay Minerals, 27, 313-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1979.0270501
[8] Sageman, B.B., Murphy, A.E., Werne, J.P., Ver Straeten, C.A., Hollander, D.J. and Lyons, T.W. (2003) A Tale of Shales: The Relative Roles of Production, Decomposition, and Dilution in the Accumulation of Organic-Rich Strata, Middle-Upper Devonian, Appalachian Basin. Chemical Geology, 195, 229-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00397-2
[9] Ver Straeten, C.A., Brett, C.E. and Sageman, B.B. (2011) Mudrock Sequence Stratigraphy: A Multi-Proxy (Sedimentological, Paleobiological, and Geochemical) Approach, Devonian Appalachian Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 304, 54-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.10.010
[10] Hansen, M.C. (1999) The Geology of Ohio—The Devonian. Ohio Geology, No. 1, 1-7.
[11] Hoover, K.V. (1960) Devonian-Mississippian Shale Sequence in Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey, Information Circular No. 27, 154 p.
[12] Szmuc, E.J. (1970) The Devonian System. In: Banks, P.O. and Feldmann, R.M., Eds., Guide to the Geology of Northeastern Ohio, Northern Ohio Geological Society, Cleveland, 9-21.
[13] Feldmann, R.M. and Hackathorn, M. (1996) Fossils of Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey, Bulletin 70, 577 p.
[14] Rich, J.L. (1951) Probable Fondo Origin of Marcellus-Ohio-New Albany-Chattanooga Bituminous Shales. AAPG Bulletin, 35, 2017-2040.
[15] Nelson, B.W. (1955) Pre-Berea Mineralogy and Stratigraphy. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, 104 p, Unpublished.
[16] Janssens, A. (1970) Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 78, 22 p.
[17] Ettensohn, F.R. and Barron, L.S. (1981) Depositional Model for the Devonian-Mississippian Black Shales of North America: A Paleoclimatic-Palaeogeographic Approach. In: Roberts, T.G., Ed., Geological Society of America, Cincinnati’81 Field Trip Guidebooks, Vol. 2, American Geological Institute, Falls Church, 344-357.
[18] Hansen, M.C. (1994) Ohio Shale Concretions. Ohio Geological Survey, GeoFacts, No. 4, 2 p.
[19] Lewis, T.L. (1988) Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Distal Basin-Margin Sedimentation of Northern Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 88, 23-39.
[20] Pashin, J.C. and Ettensohn, F.R. (1995) Reevaluation of the Bedford-Berea Sequence in Ohio and Adjacent States: Forced Regression in a Foreland Basin. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 298, 1-69.
[21] Alshahrani, S.S. (2013) Depositional Environment, History, Diagenesis, and Petroleum Geology of the Cleveland Shale Member, Northeastern Ohio. M.S. Thesis, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, 180 p, Unpublished.
[22] Goddard, E.N., Trask, P.D., DeFord, R.K., Rove, O.N., Singewald Jr., J.T. and Overbeck, R.M. (1948) Rock Color Chart. Geological Society of America, Boulder, 16 p.
[23] Potter, P.E. and Pettijohn, F.J. (1977) Paleocurrents and Basin Analysis. 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 425 p.
[24] Ingersoll, R.V., Bullard, T.F., Ford, R.L., Grimm, J.P., Pickle, J.D. and Sares, S.W. (1984) The Effect of Grain Size on Detrital Modes: A Test of the Gazzi-Dickinson Point-Counting Method. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 54, 103-116.
[25] Bozzola, J.J. and Russell, L.D. (1999) Electron Microscopy: Principles and Techniques for Biologists. Jones and Bartlett, Boston, 670 p.
[26] Beaman, D.R. and Isari, J.A. (1972) Electron Beam Microanalysis. ASTM Special Publication No. 506, Chicago, 102-108.
[27] Berger, W.H. (1974) Deep-Sea Sedimentation. In: Burk, C.A. and Drake, C.L., Eds., Geology of the Continental Margins, Springer, New York, 213-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01141-6_16
[28] Pickering, K.T., Hiscott, R.N. and Hein, F.J. (1989) Deep Marine Environments: Clastic Sedimentation and Tectonics. Unwin Hyman, London, 416 p.
[29] Dott Jr., R.H. and Bourgeois, J. (1982) Hummocky Stratification: Significance of Its Variable Bedding Sequences. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 93, 663-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1982)93<663:HSSOIV>2.0.CO;2
[30] Einsele, G. (2000) Sedimentary Basins: Evolution, Facies, and Sediment Budgets. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 792 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04029-4
[31] Myrow, P.M., Fischer, W. and Goodge, J.W. (2002) Wave-Modified Turbidites: Combined-Flow Shoreline and Shelf Deposits, Cambrian, Antarctica. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 72, 641-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/022102720641
[32] Pattison, S.A.J. (2005) Storm-Influenced Prodelta Turbidite Complex in the Lower Kenilworth Member at Hatch Mesa, Book Cliffs, Utah, U.S.A.: Implications for Shallow Marine Facies Models. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 75, 420-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2005.033
[33] Mulder, T., Syvitski, J.P.M., Migeon, S., Faugeres, J.C. and Savoye, B. (2003) Marine Hyperpycnal Flows: Initiation, Behavior, and Related Deposits: A review. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 20, 861-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2003.01.003
[34] Frey, R.W. and Pemberton, S.G. (1984) Trace Fossil Facies Models. In: Walker, R.G., Ed., Facies Models, 2nd Edition, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, 189-207.
[35] Leckie, D.A. and Walker, R.G. (1982) Storm- and Tide-Dominated Shorelines in Late Cretaceous Moosebar-Lower Gates Interval—Outcrop Equivalents of Deep Basin Gas Trap in Western Canada. AAPG Bulletin, 66, 138-157.
[36] Nichols, G. (1999) Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, 355 p.
[37] Walker, R.G. and Plint, A.G. (1992) Wave- and Storm-Dominated Shallow Marine Systems. In: Walker, R.G. and James, N.P., Eds., Facies Models: Response to Sea Level Change, Geological Association of Canada, GeoText 1, Newfoundland, 219-238.
[38] Mulder, T. and Syvitski, J.P.M. (1995) Turbidity Currents Generated at River Mouths during Exceptional Discharges to the World Oceans. Journal of Geology, 103, 285-299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/629747
[39] Jaminski, J., Algeo, T.J. and Maynard, J.B. (1998) Climatic Origin of Dm-Scale Compositional Cyclicity in the Upper Devonian Cleveland Member of the Ohio Shale (Abstract). Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 30, 25.
[40] Nijenhuis, I.A., Schenau, S.J., Van der Weijden, C.H., Hilgen, F.J., Lourens, L.J. and Zachariasse, W.J. (1996) On the Origin of Upper Miocene Sapropelites: A Case Study from the Faneromeni Section, Crete (Greece). Paleoceanography, 11, 633-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96PA01963
[41] Vazquez, A., Utrilla, R., Zamarreno, I., Sierro, F.J., Flores, J.A., Frances, G. and Barcena, M.A. (2000) Precession-Related Sapropelites of the Messinian Sorbas Basin (South Spain): Paleoenvironmental Significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 158, 353-370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00058-4
[42] Ettensohn, F.R. (2012) Generating Devonian-Mississippian Black Shale Repositories in the Appalachian Basin: Refining the Tectonic Models (Abstract). Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 44, 6.
[43] Ettensohn, F.R. (2012) Approximating Water Depths during Deposition of the Devonian-Mississippian Black Shales in the Northern Appalachian Basin (Abstract). Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 44, 6.
[44] Ver Straeten, C.A. (2012) Marcellus Black Shale Facies: Constraints and Perspectives on Water Depth (Abstract). Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 44, 6.
[45] Algeo, T.J. (2004) Can Marine Anoxic Events Draw down the Trace Element Inventory of Seawater? Geology, 32, 1057-1060.               eww141229lx

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...