跳至主要内容

Procedural Utility in the Work Place, Evidence from Mexico

Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52098#.VIVDuWfHRK0

Author(s)
The concept of Utility usually refers to the satisfaction a person acquires by consuming, in general under circumstances bonded to income, and the price of goods. In a psychological vision of personal well-being, happiness and its components, consider the fact that people can value anything. This notion has led to the study of Procedural Utility, that means people not only value the outcome of something, but also values the process and conditions in which the outcome is achieved. Procedural Utility can be obtained from various economic procedures in which individuals are part of, e.g. Work and consumption among others. Evidence has been found that in the work place the fact of being attached to hierarchy generates negative Procedural Utility because it disrupts psychological precepts that determine happiness, well-being, or utility [1]. In other cases it has been found that the process on how a wage cut is done must be considered [2]. In the light of this phenomena, I’ll discuss the concept of Procedural Utility and analyze empirical evidence for the Mexican case with “Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografía” INEGI’s self-reported well-being survey (BIARE), with the finality to give suggestions on possible applications of processes to improve the worker’s satisfaction.
Cite this paper
Vargas, A. (2014) Procedural Utility in the Work Place, Evidence from Mexico. Theoretical Economics Letters, 4, 821-828. doi: 10.4236/tel.2014.49104. 
 

[1] Schneck, S. (2012) Revisiting Procedural Utility: Evidence from European Survey Data. Econstor, 1-6.
[2] Geenberg, J. (1990) Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561
[3] Frey, B.S. and Stutzer, A. (2007) Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
[4] Savage, L.J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley, New York.
[5] Frey, B.S. and Stutzer, A. (1999) Measuring Preferences by Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155, 755-788.
[6] Benz, M. and Stutzer, A. (2003) Do Workers Enjoy Procedural Utility? Applied Economics Quarterly, 49, 1-32.
[7] Kimball, M. and Willis, R. (2006) Utility and Happiness. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1-67.
[8] Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R. (2006) Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 221-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526076
[9] Kahneman, D. and Varey, C. (1991) Notes on the Psychology of Utility: Interpersonal Comparison of Well-Being: Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[10] Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Richard, T. (1986) Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. Journal of Business, Part 2: The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory, 59, 1-16.
http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/keith.chen/negot.%20papers/KahnKnetThal_FairEcon86.pdf
[11] Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. and Sarin, R. (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355397555235
[12] Van Praag, B. (1971) The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation. European Economic Review, 2, 337-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(71)90045-6
[13] Van Praag, B.M. (1989) The Relativity of the Welfare Concept. World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University, Clarence Press, Oxford, 1-47.
[14] Van Praag, B. and Frijiters, P. (1999) The Measurement of Welfare and Well-Being: The Leyden Approach. Russell Sage Foundation, Manhattan, 1-44.
[15] Easterlin, R. (2003) Building a Better Theory of Well-Being. Conference on Paradoxes of Happiness in Economics, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, 21-23 March 2003, 1-58.
[16] Easterlin, R. (2001) Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00646
[17] Easterlin, R. (1995) Does the Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essay in Honour of Moses Abramowitz, Academic Press, New York, 89-125.
[18] Kahneman, D. (1999) Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-26.
[19] Elster, J. (1998) Emotions and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 47-74.
[20] Loewenstein, G. (1999) Because It Is There: The Challenge of Mountaineering... for Utility Theory. Kyklos, 52, 315-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb00221.x
[21] Osterloh, M. and Frey, B.S. (2000) Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 11, 538-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.538.15204
[22] Schwarze, J. and Winkelmann, R. (2005) What Can Happiness Research Tell Us about Altruism? Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1487, 1-31.
[23] Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic Punishment in Humans. Nature, 415, 137-140.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/415137a
[24] Akerlof, G.A. and Kranton, R.E. (2005) Identity and the Economics of Organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 9-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147930
[25] Frey, B., Benz, M. and Stutzer, A. (2004) Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, but also How Matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377-401.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/0932456041960560
[26] Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2000) The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. University of Rochester, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[27] Frey, B. and Benz, M. (2003) Being Independent Is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy. Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute for Economic Research, 1-36.
[28] Benz, M. (2005) The Relevance of Procedural Utility for Economics. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper Series, No. 256, Zurich, 1-32.
[29] “Procedural Fairness Home.” Procedural Fairness Home. http://proceduralfairness.org/
[30] Aghion, P. and Tirole, J. (1997) Formal and Real Authority in Organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 1-29.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/262063
[31] INEGI (2011) Sistema nacional de clasificación de ocupaciones 2011: SINCO. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, México City.
[32] Ingham, G. (1970) Size of Industrial Organization and Worker Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[33] Newby, H. (1983) The Sociology of Agriculture: Toward a New Rural Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 67-81.
[34] Gross, E. and Bendix, R. (1956) Work and Authority in Industry. American Sociological Review.
[35] De la Garza, E. (2000) Tratado latinoamericano de sociologia del trabajo. COLMEX, CFE, FLCS, UAM, Mexico City.
[36] Edwards, P.K. and Scullion, H. (1982) La organización social del conflicto laboral. Basil Blackwell Publisher, Oxford.
[37] Cassar, L. (2010) Job Protection versus Independence: The Importance of Employment Characteristics in Determining Job Satisfaction in Chile. ETH-Zurich, Zurich, 1-25.
[38] Cassar, L. (2010) Quality of Employment and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Chile. ETH-Zurich, Zurich, 1-19.
[39] Cordeiro, W.P. (1999) Can We Learn Management Techniques from the Japanese Ringi Process? Business Forum, 1-7.                        eww141208lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文