Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48728#.VKNvE8nQrzE
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=48728#.VKNvE8nQrzE
Author(s)
Technologies for
retransmission control and error correction are available for communications
over the Internet to improve reliability of data. For communications that
require the data reliability be ensured, TCP, which performs retransmission
control, is often employed. However, for environments and services where
response confirmation and retransmission are difficult, error correction
technologies are employed. Error correction is generally implemented on UDP,
but the existing framework implemented on UDP frequently does not consider the
maximum frame size of the data link layer and relegates data division to the IP
module. The IP module divides data according to the maximum size for the data
link, and the receiving IP module reconstructs the divided data. For a data
link layer typified by the current Ethernet with an error detection function,
the frame is often destroyed upon error detection. At the IP module, the
specification allows destruction of the entire dataset whenever divided data
necessary for reconstruction is incomplete. Consequently, an error in a single
bit results in a total loss of data handed to the IP module, and thus error
correction performance declines with the increase in data size handed to the IP
module. The present study considers the MTU of the data link layer and proposes
error correction protocol (ECP) over IP, which decreases the transfer data
volume flowing to the data link layer by dividing data into blocks of
appropriate size based on designated error correction code and its parameters
(thus improving error correction performance) and assesses the performance of
ECP. Experimental results demonstrate that performance is comparable or better
than existing error correction frameworks. Results also show that when a
specification not ensuring the reliability of the data link layer was employed,
error correction was superior to existing frameworks on UDP.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Matsuzawa, T. and Shimazu, K. (2014)
Implementation and Evaluation of Transport Layer Protocol Executing
Error Correction (ECP). Communications and Network, 6, 175-185. doi: 10.4236/cn.2014.63019.
| [1] | Watson, M., Began, A. and Roca, V. (2011) Forward Error Correction (FEC) Framework. Request for Comments, 6363 (Internet Engineering Task Force). |
| [2] |
Alteon Networks Extended Frame Sizes for Next Generation Ethernets, a White Paper.
http://staff.psc.edu/mathis/MTU/AlteonExtendedFrames_W0601.pdf |
| [3] | Reed, I.S. and Solomon, G. (1960) Polynomial Codes over Certain Finite Fields. J.SIAM, 8, 300-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0108018 |
| [4] | Gallager, R.G. (1962) Low-Density Parity-Check Codes. MIT Press, Cambridge. (Preliminary Version in IRE Trans on Inf. Theory, 8, 21-28.) |
| [5] | Bose, R.C. and Ray-Chaudhuri, D.K. (1960) On a Class of Error-Correcting Binary Group Codes. Inform. Control, 3, 68-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(60)90287-4 |
| [6] | Hocquenghem, A. (1959) Codes correcteursd’erreurs. Chiffres, 2, 147-156. |
| [7] | Begen, A. (2011) Session Description Protocol Elements for the Forward Error Correction (FEC) Framework. Request for Comments, 6364 (Internet Engineering Task Force). |
| [8] | Deering, S. and Hinden, R. (1998) Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification. Request for Comments, 2460 (Internet Engineering Task Force). |
| [9] |
IEEE 802.3-2002 (1985) IEEE
Standard for Information Technology, Telecommunications and Information
Exchange between Systems, Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Specific
Requireme- nts Part: 3 Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications Low-Density Parity-Check Codes. |
| [10] | Lacan, J., Roca, V., Peltotalo, J. and Peltotalo, S. (2009) Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme. Request for Comments, 5510 (Internet Engineering Task Force). eww141231lx |
| [11] | McCann, J., Deering, S. and Mogul, J. (1996) Path MTU Discovery for IP Version 6. Request for Comments, 1981 (Internet Engineering Task Force). |
| [12] | Roca, V., Cunche, M., Lacan, J., Bouabdallah, A. and Matsuzono, K. (2013) Simple Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME. Request for Comments, 6865 (Internet Engineering Task Force). |
| [13] | IEEE 802.2. (1998) IEEE Standard for Information Technology, Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems, Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Specific Requirements Part 2: Logical Link Control. |
评论
发表评论