跳至主要内容

Average Happiness and Dominant Family Type in Regions in Western Europe around 2000

Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52509#.VJoo2cCAM4

Research on the relation between family and happiness has focused on the micro level and considered the effects of an individual’s place in the family system, such as whether or not one is married and exchange of support with kin. Macro level differences in the family system as such have received little attention as yet. In this paper we consider regional differences in family types in Europe and explore the relationship with average happiness. Data on dominant family type in regions are taken from Todd (1990), who distinguishes five family types: 1) absolute nuclear; 2) egalitarian nuclear; 3) communitarian; 4) stem family; and 5) incomplete stem family. Data on average happiness in regions are taken from the Eurobarometer surveys. Average happiness appears to be highest in regions where family pattern of “absolute nuclear” prevails and lowest in the regions where “egalitarian nuclear” family dominates. Control for economic prosperity in regions does not change this picture. A possible interpretation of these findings is that freedom adds more to happiness than equality does. It is not true for types of freedom. If horizontal freedom (intragenerational freedom) seems to be important in terms of well-being, the results are much less convincing as far as vertical freedom (intergenerational freedom) is concerned. The findings might have some far reach contribution in the field of family policy.
Cite this paper
Brulé, G. and Veenhoven, R. (2014) Average Happiness and Dominant Family Type in Regions in Western Europe around 2000. Advances in Applied Sociology, 4, 271-288. doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2014.412031.
 

[1] Barrington-Leigh, C. P. (2008). Weather as a Transient Influence on Survey-Reported Satisfaction with Life. Source MPRA Paper No. 25736, 2008, Munich.
[2] Bjornskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fisher J. A. (2007). On Gender Inequality and Life-Satisfaction: Does Discrimination Matter? Discussion Paper 2007-07 University of Gallen, Department of Economics, Switzerland.
[3] Brereton F., Clinch, J. P., & Ferreira, S. (2008). Happiness, Geography and the Environment. Ecological Economics, 65, 386-396.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.008
[4] Brulé, G., & Veenhoven, R. (2012a). Why Are Latin Europeans Less Happy? The Impact of Social Hierarchy. In M. Canevacci (Ed.), Polyphonic Anthropology: Theoretical and Empirical Cross-Cultural Fieldwork, Rijeka: Intech.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/38061
[5] Brulé, G., & Veenhoven, R. (2012b). Happiness and Freedom in Bations: Why Are the Finns Happier than the French? Submitted.
[6] Brulé, G., & Veenhoven, R. (2012c). Democratic Teaching and Happiness in Developed Nations. Submitted.
[7] Clark, A. E. (2003). Inequality-Aversion and Income Mobility: A Direct Test. DELTA Working Paper, 2003-11.
[8] Duranton, G., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sandall, R. (2009). Family Types and the Persistence of Regional Disparities in Europe. Economic geography, 85, 23-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.01002.x
[9] Durkheim, E. (1897). Le suicide. étude de sociologie. Paris: Felix alcan.
[10] Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[11] Gross, R., & McIlveen, R. (1998). Psychology: A New Introduction. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
[12] Hamplova, D. (2006). Satisfaction with Life, Happiness, and Family Status in Twenty-One European Countries. Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review, 42, 35-55.
[13] Inglehart, R. (1977). Values, Objective Needs, and Subjective Satisfaction among Western Publics. Comparative Political Studies, 9, 429-458.
[14] Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Genes, Culture, Democracy, and Happiness. Culture and Subjective Well-Being, 165-183.
[15] Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin Books.
[16] Le Play, F. (1871). L’organisation de la famille (The Organisation of the Family). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.
[17] Morrison, P. (2007). Subjective Well-Being and the City. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 31, 74-103.
[18] Merton, R. K. (1949). Social Culture and Social Structure. New York City: Macillan.
[19] Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2010). Geography of European Life Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 101, 435-445.
[20] Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & DIener, E. (2011). Income Inequality and Happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095-1100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417262
[21] Oswald, A., & Wu, S. (2009). Well-Being across America: Evidence from a Random Sample of One Million U.S. Citizens. University of Warwick Working Paper.
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/academic/oswald/oswaldwuwellbeing2009.pdf
[22] Ott, J. C. (2010). Good Governance and Happiness in Nations: Technical Quality Precedes Democracy and Quality Beats Size. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 353-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9144-7
[23] Rampichini, C., & Schifini D’Andrea, S. (1998). A Hierarchical Ordinal Probit Model for the Analysis of Life Satisfaction in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 44, 41-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006888613727
[24] Raschke, H. (1977). Family Structure, Family Happiness and Their Effect on College Students’ Personal and Social Adjustement. Family Court Review, 15, 30-33.
[25] Sagart, L., Todd, E., & Little, B. (1992). Hypothesis on the Origins of the Communal Family System. Diogenes, 40, 145-182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/039219219204016009
[26] Schyns, P. (1998). Crossnational Differences in Happiness: Economic and Cultural Factors Explored. Social Indicators Research, 43, 3-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006814424293
[27] Schwartz, S. H. (1999). Cultural Value Differences: Some Implications for Work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 23-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
[28] Senik, C. (2011). The French Unhappiness Puzzle: The Cultural Dimension of Happiness. Working Paper No 2011-34.
[29] Smith, P., Peterson, M., & Schwartz, S. (2002). Cultural Values, Sources of Guidance, and Their Relevance to Managerial Behavior: A 47-Nation Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 188-208.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033002005
[30] Stanca, L. (2010). The Geography of Economics and Happiness: Spatial Patterns in the Effects of Economic Conditions on Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 99, 115-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9571-1
[31] Todd, E. (1990). L’invention de l’Europe (The Invention of Europe). Paris: Seuil.
[32] Todd, E. (2011). L’origine des systèmes familiaux-Tome 1: L’Eurasie (The Origin of Family Systems-Tome 1: Eurasia). Paris: Seuil.
[33] Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of Happiness. Dordrecht: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6432-7
[34] Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater Happiness for a Greater Number: Is that Possible and Desirable? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 605-629.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9204-z
[35] Veenhoven, R. (2011). World Database of Happiness: Example of a Focussed Findings Archive. Working Paper No. 169, German Data Forum RatSWD.
[36] Veenhoven, R. (2012a). Bibliography of Happiness. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_bib/bib_fp.php
[37] Veenhoven, R. (2012b). Happiness in Nations. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
http://worlddatababaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/nat_fp.php
[38] Veenhoven, R. (2012c). Findings on Happiness and Conditions on One’s Nation. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus university Rotterdam.
http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_cor/top_sub.php?code=N4
[39] Veenhoven, R. (2012d). Findings on Happiness and Region in Nation. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_cor/top_sub.php?code=N9
[40] Veenhoven, R. (2012e). Measures of Happiness. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
http://worldedatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_quesr/hqi_fp.htm eww141224lx

评论

此博客中的热门博文

A Comparison of Methods Used to Determine the Oleic/Linoleic Acid Ratio in Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Cultivated peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil and food crop. It is also a cheap source of protein, a good source of essential vitamins and minerals, and a component of many food products. The fatty acid composition of peanuts has become increasingly important with the realization that oleic acid content significantly affects the development of rancidity. And oil content of peanuts significantly affects flavor and shelf-life. Early generation screening of breeding lines for high oleic acid content greatly increases the efficiency of developing new peanut varieties. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of methods used to classify individual peanut seed as high oleic or not high oleic. Three hundred and seventy-four (374) seeds, spanning twenty-three (23) genotypes varying in oil composition (i.e. high oleic (H) or normal/not high oleic (NH) inclusive of all four peanut market-types (runner, Spanish, Valencia and Virginia), were individually tested ...

Location Optimization of a Coal Power Plant to Balance Costs against Plant’s Emission Exposure

Fuel and its delivery cost comprise the biggest expense in coal power plant operations. Delivery of electricity from generation to consumers requires investment in power lines and transmission grids. Placing a coal power plant or multiple power plants near dense population centers can lower transmission costs. If a coalmine is nearby, transportation costs can also be reduced. However, emissions from coal plants play a key role in worsening health crises in many countries. And coal upon combustion produces CO 2 , SO 2 , NO x , CO, Metallic and Particle Matter (PM10 & PM2.5). The presence of these chemical compounds in the atmosphere in close vicinity to humans, livestock, and agriculture carries detrimental health consequences. The goal of the research was to develop a methodology to minimize the public’s exposure to harmful emissions from coal power plants while maintaining minimal operational costs related to electric distribution losses and coal logistics. The objective was...

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Use of a Home-Use High-Frequency Facial Treatment Appliance

At present, many home-use beauty devices are available in the market. In particular, many products developed for facial treatment use light, e.g., a flash lamp or a light-emitting diode (LED). In this study, the safety of 4 weeks’ continuous use of NEWA TM , a high-frequency facial treatment appliance, every alternate day at home was verified, and its efficacy was evaluated in Japanese individuals with healthy skin aged 30 years or older who complained of sagging of the facial skin.  Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), melanin levels, erythema levels, sebum secretion levels, skin color changes and wrinkle improvement in the facial skin were measured before the appliance began to be used (study baseline), at 2 and 4 weeks after it had begun to be used, and at 2 weeks after completion of the 4-week treatment period (6 weeks from the study baseline). In addition, data obtained by subjective evaluation by the subjects themselves on a visual analog scale (VAS) were also analyzed. Fur...