Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=47209#.VFw5a2fHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=47209#.VFw5a2fHRK0
Author(s)
Earth science educators struggle to gain an equal footing in the K-12
curriculum with the life and physical sciences. The low number of students taking
Earth sciences courses is at odds with theNational
Science and Education Standards (National Research Council, 1996, 2012) that gives equal emphasis to Earth and space
science (ESS). The purpose of this investigation was to analyze students’ and
teachers’ perceptions of Earth science and its perceived educational values in
secondary schools. The sample for this study consisted of 39 science teachers
in public secondary schools, and 46 students taking science in those schools.
The instruments for the study included a 14-item Earth Science Teacher Survey
(ESTS) and a 14-item Earth Science Student Survey (ESSS) (surveys modified from King, 2001). The results of this study showed that
teachers do not think that ESS is as important to the secondary school
curriculum as physics, chemistry, and biology. Not unexpectedly, Earth science
teachers had more positive perceptions of Earth science and its educational
value than non-Earth science teachers. Students in this study had more positive
perceptions of Earth science and its educational value than teachers. These
students also reported a high level of enjoyment learning about Earth science
and a high interest in learning about ESS topics.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Betzner, J. and Marek, E. (2014) Teacher and
Student Perceptions of Earth Science and Its Educational Value in
Secondary Schools. Creative Education, 5, 1019-1031. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.511116.
[1] | Benbow, A. E. (2011). Geoscience Currents. Report No. 44, American Geosciences Institute, Alexandria. |
[2] |
Dodick, J., & Orion, N.
(2003). Geology as a Historical Science: Its Perception within Science
and the Education System. Science and Education, 12, 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023096001250 |
[3] |
Geological Society of America
(2011). The Importance of Teaching Earth Science Position Statement. http://www.geosociety.org/positions/position4.htm |
[4] | Gonzales, L. (2009). Status of the Geoscience Workforce. American Geosciences Institute, Alexandria. |
[5] | Gonzales, L. (2011). Status of the Geoscience Workforce. American Geosciences Institute, Alexandria. |
[6] |
King, C. (2001). The Response of
Teachers to New Subject Areas in a National Science Curriculum: The
Case of the Earth Science Component. Science Education, 85, 636-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.1030 |
[7] | Lewis, E., & Baker, D. (2010). A Call for a New Geoscience Education Research Agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 121-129. |
[8] | Lowry, R. (2010). Two-Way Anova. http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/anova2u.html |
[9] | National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. |
[10] | National Research Council (2012). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. |
[11] |
Oklahoma State Department of Education (2012). Oklahoma C3 Standards. http://ok.gov/sde/oklahoma-c3-standards eww141107lx |
评论
发表评论