Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51551#.VG2pkWfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51551#.VG2pkWfHRK0
Author(s)
Introduction: Stapler application for pharyngeal
closure after total laryngectomy allows rapid watertight closure. We
intend to report the experience of the Portuguese Oncology Institute of
Lisbon, Francisco Gentil (IPOLFG). Material and Methods: Retrospective
study of patients submitted to total laryngectomy using linear stapler
device treated in IPOLFG from 2005 to 2010. Results: 108 patients were
studied. The majority of patients were male, aged from 60 to 69 years
old, and had smoking and alcohol habits. The average length of hospital
stay was 13.1 days. Post-operative complications occurred as follows:
wound infection in 6.5%, cervical hematoma in 4.6% and pharyngocutaneous
fistula in 11.1% of cases. Conclusions: The mechanical suture of the
pharynx in total laryngectomy is a simple and quick method. It does not
increase the incidence of post-operative complications. It seems to be a
very safe method, as long as its limits regarding the location and
extent of tumour are respected.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Durao, C. , Motta, S. , Hebe, A. , Pacheco, R. ,
Montalvão, P. and Magalhães, M. (2014) Linear Stapler in Total
Laryngectomy. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 3, 354-358. doi: 10.4236/ijohns.2014.36063.
[1] |
Stell, P.M. (1975) The First
Laryngectomy. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 89, 353-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100080488 |
[2] |
Bedrin, L., Ginsburg, G.,
Horowitz, Z. and Talmi, Y.P. (2005) 25-Year Experience of Using a Linear
Stapler in Laryngectomy. Head & Neck, 27, 1073-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0945-4 |
[3] | Estibeiro, H. (2004) Total Laryngectomy, Surgery of the Larynx. N.P. Circulo Médico, 123-135. |
[4] |
Gonçalves, A.J., Souza Jr.,
J.A., Menezes, M.B., Kavabata, N.K., et al. (2009) Pharyngocutaneous
Fistulae Following Total Laryngectomy Comparison between Manual and
Mechanical Sutures. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 266,
1793-1798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-0945-4 |
[5] |
Sofferman, R.A. and Voronetsky,
I. (2000) Use of the Linear Stapler for Pharyngoesophageal Closure after
Total Laryngectomy. The Laryn-goscope, 110, 1406-1409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200008000-00035 |
[6] | Montoya, F., Ruiz de Galarreta, J.C., Sánchez del Rey, A., Martínez Ibargüen, A., et al. (2002) Comparative Study between the Use of Manual versus Mechanical Sutures in the Closing of the Mucous Defect Following a Total Laryngectomy. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española, 53, 343-350. |
[7] | Altissimi, G. and Frenguelli, A. (2007) Linear Stapler Closure of the Pharynx during Total Laryngectomy: A 15-Year Experience (from Closed Technique to Semi-Closed Technique). Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Itálica, 27, 118-122. |
[8] |
Agrawal, A. and Schuller, E.
(2000) Closed Laryngectomy Using the Automatic Linear Stapling Device.
The Laryngoscope, 110, 1402-1405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200008000-00034 eww141120lx |
[9] | Ahumada, N., Oliveira, C. and Takimoto, R. (2011) Stapler Device at the Closure of the Pharynx after Total Laryngectomy: 7 Years of Experience. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia da Cabeça e Pescoço, 40, 144-147. |
评论
发表评论