Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51355#.VGVf5mfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51355#.VGVf5mfHRK0
The adoption of performance indicators promotes
knowledge of quantitative and qualitative material wastes in businesses
and, when inserted in a collaborative process, provides a comparative
evaluation of results between companies and, thereafter, an
identification of best practices (bench-marking). The purpose of this
paper is to present the best practices identified by performance
indicators, related to the measurement of wastes and associated to
construction companies participation in the benchmarking research
process “Implementation of a system of performance indicators of
cement-based construction technologies of the Community of Construction
of Recife city in Brazil-PROGRIDE”, coordinated by the Brazilian
Association of Portland Cement-ABCP. Therefore, it was sought to
characterize best practices that led to the benchmarking of performance
indicators related to the wastes of concrete, industrialized mortar for
masonry settling and blocks/ bricks. As a contribution, a set of factors
that characterize the best practices for each technology and conducted
to benchmarking were identified.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Lordsleem Júnior, A. and de Lima, B. (2014)
Indicators Benchmarking of Cement-Based Construction Technologies:
Brazilian Case Study. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 4, 301-310. doi: 10.4236/ojce.2014.44025.
[1] | Pinho, S.A.C. (2013) Desenvolvimento de programa de indicadores de desempenho para tecnologias construtivas à base de cimento: Perdas, consumo e produtividade. Master Dissertation, Pernambuco University, Recife. |
[2] | Pinto, T.P. (1989) Perdas de materiais em processos construtivos tradicionais. Ph.D. Dissertation, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos. |
[3] | Duarte, C.M.M. (2011) Desenvolvimento de sistema de indicadores para benchmarking em empresas de construção civil. Master Dissertation, University of Pernambuco, Recife. |
[4] | Lordsleem Jr., A.C., Andrade, F.K.G. and Pinho, S.A.C. (2011) Benchmarking em construtoras: Caracterização das melhores práticas de 04 indicadores de execução de obras. In: VIII Encontro Tecnológico da Engenharia Civil e Arquitetura—ENTECA, Maringá, 1-12. |
[5] | Bakens, W., Viries, O. and Courtney, R. (2005) International Review of Benchmarking in Construction. PSIBOUW, Amsterdã. |
[6] |
Bastos, P.S.S. (2008) Fundamentos do concreto armado.
http://wwwp.feb.unesp.br/pbastos/concreto1/FUNDAMENTOS.pdf |
[7] | Araújo, L.O.C. (2000) Método para a previsão e controle da produtividade da mão de obra na execução de f?rmas, armação, concretagem e alvenaria. Master Dissertation, São Paulo University, São Paulo. |
[8] | Tcpo (2010) Tabelas de Composição de Preços para Orçamentos. Pini, São Paulo. |
[9] | Oliveira, F.A.L. (2006) Argamassa industrializada: Vantagens e desvantagens. Civil Engineer Degree Dissertation, Anhembi Morumbi University, São Paulo. |
[10] | Lordsleem Jr., A.C. (2000) Execução e inspeção de alvenaria racionalizada. Editora O Nome da Rosa, São Paulo. eww141114lx |
评论
发表评论