How the Final Swedish Clinical Exam Prepares the Nursing Students for Their Future Challenges-Qualitative Analysis
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51843#.VHfRIWfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51843#.VHfRIWfHRK0
Author(s)
1School of Social and Health Sciences, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
2Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
3Sophiahemmet University College, Stockholm, Sweden.
4Department of Clinical Sciences and Education, Karolinska Institute, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
5Department of Nursing, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
2Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
3Sophiahemmet University College, Stockholm, Sweden.
4Department of Clinical Sciences and Education, Karolinska Institute, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
5Department of Nursing, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
The national clinical final examination (NCFE) plays
an important role in order to measure the level of knowledge and
performance of nursing students. Our findings indicate that the design
of the NCFE is beneficial for the students’ clinical reasoning and
problem solution in the caring situation. The aim of this study was to
investigate the experiences of the NCFE from lecturers who corrected the
written part examination. A further aim was to study the lectures and
the RN during observation in the bedside part of the examination. The
NCFE is divided into two parts: a theoretical (written) part and a
practical (bedside) part. In nursing education it is essential to assess
nursing competencies for the future professional role such as the
assessment of clinical competence that has become central to evaluate
what outcomes are assessed. In addition, it provides a valuable approach
to measure the level of knowledge and performance of nursing students.
Future development of the NCFE is necessary regarding the degree to
which the examination meets learning objectives and educational results.
Cite this paper
Ziegert, K. , Elmqvist, M. , Johanssons, U. ,
Larsson, M. and Andersson, P. (2014) How the Final Swedish Clinical
Exam Prepares the Nursing Students for Their Future
Challenges-Qualitative Analysis. Creative Education, 5, 1887-1894. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.521211.
| [1] |
AlKadri, H. M., Al Moamary, M.
S., Roberts, C. H., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2012). Exploring
Assessment Factors Contributing to Students’ Study Strategies:
Literature Review. Medical Teacher, 34, 42-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.656756 |
| [2] |
Andersson, P. L., & Edberg,
A. K. (2010). The Transition from Rookie to Genuine Nurse: Narratives
from Swedish Nurses 1 Year after Graduation. Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing, 41, 186-192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20100326-05 |
| [3] |
Andersson, P. L.,
Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Johansson, U.-B., Larsson, M., & Ziegert, K.
(2012). Nursing Students’ Experiences of Assessment by the Swedish
National Clinical Final Examination. Nurse Education Today, 33, 536-540.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.004 |
| [4] |
Athlin, E., Larsson, M., &
Söderhamn, O. (2012). A Model for a National Clinical Final Examination
in the Swedish Bachelor Programme in Nursing. Journal of Nursing
Management, 20, 90-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.004 |
| [5] | Banning, M. (2008). A Review of Clinical Decision Making: Models and Current Research. Journal ofClinical Nursing, 17, 187-195. |
| [6] | Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University Press. |
| [7] | Boursicot, K. A. M., Roberts, T. E., & Burdick, W. P. (2011). Structured Assessments of Clinical Competence. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding Medical Education, Evidence, Theory and Practice (pp. 246-258). London: Wiley-Blackwell. |
| [8] | Ekebergh, M. (2011). A Learning Model for Nursing Students during Clinical Studies. Nurse Education in Practice, 6, 348-389. |
| [9] |
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman,
B. (2004). Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts,
Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness. Nurse Education
Today, 24, 105-112.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 |
| [10] |
Hatfield, D., & Lovegrove,
J. (2012). The Use of Skills Inventories to Assess and Grade Practice:
Part 2—Evaluation of Assessment Strategy. Nurse Education in Practice,
12, 133-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.01.013 |
| [11] |
Jerlock, M., Falk, K., &
Severinsson, E. (2003). Academic Nursing Education Guidelines: Tool for
Bridging the Gap between Theory, Research and Practice. Nursing and
Health Sciences, 5, 219-228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.2003.00156.x |
| [12] |
Johansson, U. B., Lilja
Andersson, P., Larsson, M., Ziegert, K., & Ahlner-Elmqvist, M.
(2014). Use of a National Clinical Final Examination in a Bachelor’s
Programme in Nursing to Assess Clinical Competence—Students’, Lecturers’
and Nurses’ Perceptions. Open Journal of Nursing, 4, 501-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2014.47053 |
| [13] |
Meah, Y. S., Smith, E., &
Thomas, D. C. (2009). Student-Run Health Clinic: Novel Arena to Educate
Medical Students on Systems-Based Practice. Mount Sinai Journal of
Medicine, 76, 344-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/msj.20128 |
| [14] |
Miller, G. (1990). The
Assessment of Clinical Skills/Competence/Performance. Academic Medicine,
65, 63-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045 |
| [15] |
Norcini, J. J. (2005). Current
Perspective in Assessment: The Assessment of Performance at Work.
Medical Education, 39, 880-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02182.x |
| [16] | Norcini, J. J. (2011). Workplace Assessment. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding Medical Education, Evidence, Theory and Practice (pp. 232-245). London: Wiley-Blackwell. |
| [17] |
Rochmawati, E., & Wiechula,
R. (2010). Education Strategies to Foster Health Professional Students’
Clinical Reasoning Skills. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12, 244-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2009.00512.x |
| [18] |
Simmons, B., Launza, D.,
Fonteyn, M., Hicks, F., & Holm, K. (2003). Clinical Reasoning in
Experienced Nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 701-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193945903253092 |
| [19] |
Smith, J., Thurkettle, M. A.,
& De la Cruz, F. A. (2004). Use of Intuition by Nursing Students:
Instrument Development and Testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47,
614-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03149.x |
| [20] | Swedish Law Collector (2008). The Law of Ethics for Evaluation of Medical Research. SFS 2008:192. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag. (In Swedish) |
| [21] |
Ziegert, K., Fridlund, B., &
Lidell, E. (2007). Professional Support for Next of Kin’s of
Haemodialysis Patients: A Content Analysis of Nursing Documentation.
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 353-361.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01597.x |
| [22] |
öhlén, J., Furuaker, C.,
Jakobsson, E., Bergh, I., & Hermansson, E. (2011). Impact of the
Bologna Process in Bachelor Nursing Programmes: The Swedish Case. Nurse
Education Today, 31, 122-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.002 eww141128lx |
评论
发表评论