Estimating Benefits from Immunesuppressive Treatment in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis: Data from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51274#.VGGiqmfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=51274#.VGGiqmfHRK0
Author(s)
Objective: To determine the efficacy of
immunesuppressive treatment over 1 year in early diffuse cutaneous
systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Methods: dcSSc patients with less than 3
years disease duration and at least one year of data enrolled in the
CSRG database were included. Regression analyses for achieving at least
minimal important differences (MID) for 5 outcomes over one year were
done to determine baseline predictors of change and if immunesuppressive
treatment yielded the attainment of the MID. Results: 124 patients
(mean age 52.3 years; 79.2% female) were included. Variables associated
with MID at one year were often the baseline variable and for some
outcomes, age, sex, smoking, restrictive lung disease and treatment
type. Treatment with immunesuppressive was not found to be associated
with achieving MIDs in multivariate analyses. Conclusion: Treatment was
associated with achieving a MID change at 1 year using univariate
statistics, but not in multivariate models. These observational data do
not support improvement with immunesuppressives over one year but there
could be confounding or biases comparing with those prescribed
immunesuppressives vs. those who don’t.
Cite this paper
Choy, T. , Baron, M. and Pope, J. (2014)
Estimating Benefits from Immunesuppressive Treatment in Diffuse
Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis: Data from the Canadian Scleroderma
Research Group. Open Journal of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases, 4, 248-253. doi: 10.4236/ojra.2014.44034.
| [1] |
Merkel, P.A., Silliman, N.P.,
Clements, P.J., Denton, C.P., Furst, D.E., Mayes, M.D., et al. (2012)
Patterns and Predictors of Change in Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials
in Scleroderma: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis of 629 Subjects
with Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism,
64, 3420-3429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.34427 |
| [2] |
Hudson, M., Steele, R., Lu, Y.,
Thombs, B.D., Panopalis, P., Baron, M., et al. (2009) Clinical
Correlates of Self-Reported Physical Health Status in Systemic
Sclerosis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 36, 1226-1229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.081057 |
| [3] | Pope, J. (2011) Measures of Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma): Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Scleroderma HAQ (SHAQ), Physician-and Patient-Rated Global Assessments, Symptom Burden Index (SBI), University of California, Los Angeles, Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Scale (UCLA SCTC GIT) 2.0, Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) (Mahler’s Index), Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR), and Raynaud’s Condition Score (RCS). Arthritis Care & Research (Hoboken), 63, S98-S111. |
| [4] |
Beaton, D.E., Boers, M. and
Wells, G.A. (2002) Many Faces of the Minimal Clinically Important
Difference (MCID): A Literature Review and Directions for Future
Research. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 14, 109-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006 |
| [5] |
Khanna, D., Furst, D.E., Hays,
R.D., Park, G.S., Wong, W.K., Seibold, J.R., et al. (2006) Minimally
Important Difference in Diffuse Systemic Sclerosis: Results from the
D-Penicillamine Study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 65, 1325-1329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2005.050187 |
| [6] |
Sekhon, S. and Pope, J.,
Canadian Scleroderma Research Group and Baron M. (2010) The Minimally
Important Difference in Clinical Practice for Patient-Centered Outcomes
Including Health Assessment Questionnaire, Fatigue, Pain, Sleep, Global
Visual Analog Scale, and SF-36 in Scleroderma. The Journal of
Rheumatology, 37, 591-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090375 |
| [7] | Lawrence, E., Pope, J., Al-Zahraly, Z., Lalani, S. and Baron, M. (2009) The Relationship between Changes in Self-Reported Disability (Measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire—HAQ) in Scleroderma and Improvement of Disease Status in Clinical Practice. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 27, 32-37. |
| [8] |
Khanna, D., Yan, X., Tashkin,
D.P., Furst, D.E., Elashoff, R., Roth, M.D., et al. (2007) Impact of
Oral Cyclophosphamide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with
Active Scleroderma Lung Disease: Results from the Scleroderma Lung
Study. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 56, 1676-1684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.22580 |
| [9] |
Soliman, M.M., Hyrich, K.L.,
Lunt, M., Watson, K.D., Symmons, D.P., Ashcroft, D.M., et al. (2012)
Effectiveness of Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis:
Observational Study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics
Register. The Journal of Rheumatology, 39, 240-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110610 |
| [10] |
Jordan, S., Distler, J.H.,
Maurer, B., Huscher, D., van Laar, J.M., Allanore, Y., et al. (2014)
Effects and Safety of Rituximab in Systemic Sclerosis: An Analysis from
the European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) Group. Annals of
the Rheumatic Diseases, Published Online First 17 January 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204522 |
| [11] | Gazi, H., Pope, J., Clements, P., Medsger, T., Martin, R., Kahaleh, B., et al. (2007) Outcome Measurements in Scleroderma. The Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 501-509. eww141111lx |
评论
发表评论