跳至主要内容

The Syntax-Semantics-Prosody Interface in Legislative Language

Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50169#.VDSjJ1fHRK0

Author(s)
Though Chinese and English legislative language share similarities in certain aspects, they contrast most sharply in their syntactic structures and representations, owing to a number of social, cultural and typological factors. Traditional works have directed most of their attention to the lexicon, i.e. the collection of technical terms which are indispensable to the working of law, and the analysis of idiosyncrasies of those terms. Not much effort, if any, has been at present devoted to the study of the syntactic properties of legislative language and the way syntactic computation interfaces with semantic layer, which, the author believes, play a more determinate role in the constructing and interpreting of legislative clauses. This paper first attempts to examine the syntax-semantics interface in Chinese and English legal clauses from the levels of recursion, locality of reference and the general principle of economy respectively, and then tries to study how the position and stress of a word affect the syntax-prosody interface and the information flow. In the end, it concludes that syntax is responsible for base meaning and while prosody highlights a part or parts of that meaning.
Cite this paper
Shi, H. (2014). The Syntax-Semantics-Prosody Interface in Legislative Language. Beijing Law Review, 5, 240-247. doi: 10.4236/blr.2014.53021. 
 

[1] Bhatia, V. K. (2010). Legal Writing: Specificity. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 37-50). New York: Routledge.
[2] Brunson, S. (2012). Book Review: Solan’s the language of Statutes.
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/02/book-review-solans-the-language-of-statutes.html
[3] Buring, D. (2013). Syntax, Information Structure and Prosody. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax (pp. 860-895). Cambridge, England: CUP.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804571.029
[4] Chomsky, Norm. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
[5] Chomsky, Norm. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
[6] Coode, G. (1845). On Legislative Expression, or the Language of the Written Law. London.
[7] Crandall, J., & Charrow, V. R. (1990). Linguistic Aspects of Legal Language, 1-23.
http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED318248
[8] Dikken, den. M., & Lahne, A. (2013). The Locality of Syntactic Dependencies. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax (pp. 655-697). Cambridge, England: CUP.
[9] Epstein, S. D. et al. (2013). Economy of Derivation and Representation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax (pp. 487-514). Cambridge, England: CUP.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804571.019
[10] Feng, S. L. (2007). Theory of Prosodic Grammar and Chinese Linguistics. Linguistic Sciences, 2, 48-59.
[11] Goodrich, P. (1984). The Role of Linguistics in Legal Analysis. The Modern Law Review, 47, 523-534.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1984.tb01664.x
[12] Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Essay in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: OUP.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253884.001.0001
[13] Hutton, C. (2009). Language, Meaning and the Law. Edinbergh: Edinbergh University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748633500.001.0001
[14] Ji, G. (1998). Falv Yingyu de Wenti Tedian ji Yingyi Jiqiao. Chinese Translators Journal, 5, 31-34.
[15] Johnson, A., & Coulthard, M. (2010). Introduction: Current Debates in Forensic Linguistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.
[16] Maat, E. et al. (2009). Making Sense of Legal Texts. In Formal Linguitics and Law (pp. 225-255). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
[17] Maley, Y. (1987). The Language of Legislation. Language in Society, 16, 25-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012112
[18] Mei, D. (2008). Modern Syntax. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[19] Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
[20] Quirk et al. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Pearson Longman.
[21] Salmi-Tolonen, T. (2004). Legal Linguistic Knowledge and Creating and Interpreting Law in Multilingual Environments. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 29, 1167-1191.
[22] Solan, L. M. (1993).The Language of Judges. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226767895.001.0001
[23] Song, B., & Chen, Y. (2009). Yuyan Zhexue Yu Falv Yuyan Guifanhua Yanjiu. Tsinghua Law Review, 3, 150-160.
[24] Van Valin, R. D. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578
[25] Venturi, G. (2010). Legal Language and Legal Knowledge Management Application. Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. (pp. 3-26). Berlin: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_1
[26] Vogel, C. (2009). Law Matters, Syntax Matters and Semantics Matters. In E. Francesconi, S. Montemagni, W. Peters, & D. Tiscornia (Eds.), Formal Linguistics and Law (pp. 25-54). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
[27] Woodbine, G. E. (1943). The Language of English Law. Speculum, 18, 395-436.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2853661
[28] Xiao, Y. (2007). Falv Yingyu Juzi Jiegou Tedian Jiqi Fanyi. Journal of Ningxia University, 29, 179-182.
[29] Zhang, X. (2005). Text Types and Legal Texts. Modern Foreign Language, 24, 192-200.                                                eww141008lx
标签：

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Does Immigration Promote the Investment of the Monopolistic Firm?

In the present paper, we examine the effect of increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth on the optimal timing of investment of a firm that has a monopolistic power over the labor market. It is revealed that when the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is more than a threshold level, increasing uncertainty of immigrants’ growth accelerates the optimal timing of firms’ investment and enhances the economic growth, even if the uncertainty of immigrants’ growth is formulated by the geometric Brownian motion, which is in sharp contrast to the standard result that an increase in the uncertainty postpones the optimal timing. With an increase in the immigrants over the past ten years, workforces in the host countries have been growing significantly to the extent that the immigrants represent 70% of the increase in the workforce in Europe, and 47% in the United States as OECD indicates. In the present paper, we attempted to investigate the effect of increased uncertainty caused by the growi...
发表评论
阅读全文

Education Policy Implementation: A Mechanism for Enhancing Primary Education Development in Zanzibar

Education is one of the fundamental rights of individuals; therefore, the government of a country needs to develop and strengthen educational policy and quality as well as to ensure that everyone has equal access to basic education. The improvement of access and quality of education in the world is becoming as an essential factor in development, whereas the basic education (primary school), is acknowledged as a foundation of the higher educational development for every country. To fulfill this goal, governments introduce several policies and procedures; however, it requires some reforms and participation from the politician, policymakers, and other stakeholders to re-examine educational policy so that it can lead to multiplication and betterment of the reforms. Educational reforms actually focus on accountability. A positive educational development and reform is very challenging and needs more effort and strategy on how to use and utilize the resources effectively as such it can achie...
发表评论
阅读全文