The Precise Methods for the Measurement of Collimator Hole Angulation and Center of Rotation of SPECT by Adaptive Quality Control Phantom
Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50534#.VESiG1fHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50534#.VESiG1fHRK0
Author(s)
1Application
of Radiation Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research
Institute, Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), Karaj, Iran.
2Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (AEOI), Tehran, Iran.
3Department of Physics, Peyambare Azam Institute, Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4Parto Control in Advance Co., Tehran, Iran.
2Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (AEOI), Tehran, Iran.
3Department of Physics, Peyambare Azam Institute, Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4Parto Control in Advance Co., Tehran, Iran.
The Adaptive Quality Control Phantom (AQCP) is a
computer-controlled phantom which positions and moves a radioactive
source in the Field of View (FOV) of an imaging nuclear medicine device
on a definite path to produce a spatial distribution of gamma rays to
perform QC Tests such as the Collimator Hole Angulation (CHA) and the
Center of Rotation (COR) of Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography
(SPECT). The collimator hole angulation for six collimators was measured
using a point source and a computer-controlled cylindrical positioning
system. In this method, the displacement of the image of a point source
was examined as the AQCP was moving point source vertically away from
the collimator face. The results of the high-accuracy measurement method
of CHA show that the measurement accuracy for absolute angulation
errors is better than ±0.024°. The Root Mean Square (RMS) of CHA for
LEHR, LEHS and LEUHR collimators of SMV dual heads camera and LEGP, MEGP
and HEGP of GE Millennium MG were evaluated to be 0.290°, 0.292°,
0.208°, 0.154°, 0.220° and 0.202°, respectively. It is to be added in
this connection that the evaluated RMS of CHA for LEHR collimator with
the distance variation from the collimator’s surface ±1 mm has been
varied ±0.04 degree. A new method for the center of rotation assessment
by AQCP is introduced and the results of this proposed method as
compared with the routine QC test and their differences are discussed in
detail. We defined and measured a new parameter called Dynamic
Mechanical Error (DME) for applying the gantry motion correction.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Zeinali, H. , Ataee, M. , Ravanbakhsh, H. ,
Goodarzi, E. , Ghoreishi, S. and Raisali, G. (2014) The Precise
Methods for the Measurement of Collimator Hole Angulation and Center of
Rotation of SPECT by Adaptive Quality Control Phantom. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 4, 208-215. doi: 10.4236/wjnst.2014.44026.
[1] | Malmin, R.E., Peggy, C.S. and Guth, W.R. (1990) Collimator Angulation Error and Its Effect on SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 31, 655-659. |
[2] | Busemann-Sokole, E. (1986) Measurement of Collimator Hole Angulation and Camera Head Tilt for Slant and Parallel Hole Collimators Used in SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 28, 1592-1598. |
[3] | Chang, W, Li, S.Q., Williams, J.J., et al. (1988) New Methods of Examining Gamma Camera Collimators. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 29, 674-683. |
[4] | (1987) Rotating Scintillation Camera SPECT Acceptance Testing and Quality Control. AAPM Report No. 22, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park. |
[5] | Quality Control of Nuclear Medicine Instruments (1991) IAEA TECDOC 602. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. |
[6] | Eckholt, M. and Bergmann, H. (2000) Angulation Errors in Parallel-Hole and Fan Beam Collimators: Computer Controlled Quality Control and Acceptance Testing Procedure. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 41, 548-555. |
[7] |
Takahashi, Y., Murase, K.,
Higashno, H., et al. (2002) SPECT Imaging with Off-Set Detector System:
Comparison of Sampling Angles 2, 4 and 6 Degrees. Annals of Nuclear
Medicine, 16, 343-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02988623 |
[8] |
Hines, H., Kayayan, R., Colsher,
J., et al. (1999) Recommendations for Implementing SPECT
Instrumentation Quality Control. Nuclear Medicine Section—National
Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). European Journal of Nuclear
Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 26, 527-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002590050421 |
[9] | Thomas, G.B. (1969) Calculus and Analytic Geometry. 4th Edition, Addison Wesley, Reading, 340-470. |
[10] | National Instruments Corporation. www.NI.com |
[11] |
Zeinali, H.Z., Ghiassi-Nejad, M.
and Mirzai, A. (2007) Design an Adaptive Quality Control Phantom to
Optimize QC Test Methods. The Open Medical Imaging Journal, 1, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874347100701010001 |
[12] |
Zeinali, H.Z. and Mirzai, A.
(2008) Design an Adaptive Quality Control Phantom to Optimize Integral
and Differential Uniformity, Collimator Hole angulation and Center of
Rotation of SPECT. The Current Medical Imaging Reviews, 4, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340508784356743 |
[13] | Kuo, B.C. (1987) Automatic Control Systems. 5th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 290-345. |
[14] |
Zeinali, H.Z., Ghiassi-Nejad, M.
and Mirzai, A. (2008) Design an Adaptive Quality Control Phantom to
Optimize Uniformity, Collimator Hole Angulation and Center of Rotation
of SPECT. The Journal of Instrumentation, 3, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/3/02/P02009 eww141020lx |
评论
发表评论