Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50555#.VESlWFfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50555#.VESlWFfHRK0
Author(s)
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the
functional characteristics of ArcCheck™ array detectors and the
application for Tomotherapy IMRT plan verification. Method and
Materials: The basic character of the ArcCheck applying on Tomotherapy
system was tested. The diode testing procedures included the followings:
The short term reproducibility, linearity, dose rate dependence, the
profile measurement compared to ion chamber. The effect of insert on
gamma passing rate was also studied. A total number of 602 Tomotherapy
Delivery Quality Assurance (DQA) plans were retrospectively analyzed to
obtain the action limit results with statistical significance
evaluation. Results: The short term reproducibility, linearity, dose
rate dependence, profile to ion chamber correlation and clinical
application were all compared with satisfactory outcome with this
device. If anterior diode points were properly calibrated with machine
absolute output, then there was no significant difference between the
ArcCheck phantom with and without insert on gamma passing rate. The
average passing rate was 97.5% and the recommend action level was
established at 92% based on the 602 patients’ clinical data with 95%
confidence level criteria. Conclusion: This comprehensive study shows
that ArcCheck is an accurate and efficient device for quality assurance
of Tomotherapy with remarkable consistency of 3D volume analysis of arc
therapy.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Yue, Q. , Duan, J. , Li, R. and Yang, J. (2014)
Systematic Analysis of the ArcCheck Diode Arrays for Tomotherapy
Delivery Verification. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 3, 218-225. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2014.34028.
| [1] |
Mackie, T.R., Holmes, T.,
Swerdloff, S., et al. (1993) Tomotherapy: A New Concept for the Delivery
of Conformal Radiotherapy. Medical Physics, 20, 1709-1719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.596958 |
| [2] |
Fenwick, J.D., Tomé, W.A.,
Jaradat, H.A., et al. (2004) Quality Assurance of a Helical Tomotherapy
Machine. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 49, 2933-2953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.596958 |
| [3] |
Thomas, S.D., Mackenzie, M.,
Field, G.C., et al. (2005) Patient Specific Treatment Verifications for
Helical Tomotherapy Treatment Plans. Medical Physics, 32, 3793-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2134929 |
| [4] |
Langen, K.M., Papanikolaou, N.,
Balog, J., et al. (2010) QA for Helical Tomotherapy: Report of the AAPM
Task GROUP 148. Medical Physics, 37, 4817-4853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2134929 |
| [5] | Delivery Quality Assurance Guide, Accuray Corporation. |
| [6] |
Yan, Y., Papanikolaou, N., Weng,
X., et al. (2005) Fast Radiographic Film Calibration Procedure for
Helical Tomotherapy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Dose
Verification. Medical Physics, 32, 1566-1570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2134929 |
| [7] | Zhu, X.R., Jursinic, P.A., Grimm, D.F., et al. (2002) Evaluation of Kodak EDR2 Film for Dose Verification of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Delivered by a Static Multileaf Collimator. Medical Physics, 31, 2284-2288. |
| [8] | Shi, C., Papanikolaou, N., Yan, Y., et al. (2006) Analysis of the Sources of Uncertainty for EDR2 Film-Based IMRT Quality Assurance. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 25, 1-8. |
| [9] | Buonamici, F.B., Compagnucci, A., Marrazzo, L., et al. (2012) An Intercomparison between Film Dosimetry and Diode Matrix for IMRT Quality Assurance. Medical Physics, 39, 6339-6350. |
| [10] | Lewis, D., Micke, A., Yu, X. and Chan, M. (2014) An Efficient Protocol for Radiochromic Film Dosimetry Combining Calibration and Measurement in a Single Scan. Medical Physics, 13, 57-67. |
| [11] |
Nelms, B.E., Zhen, H. and Tomé,
W.A. (2011) Per-Beam, Planar IMRT QA Passing Rates Do Not Predict
Clinically Relevant Patient Dose Errors. Medical Physics, 38, 1037-1044.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3544657 |
| [12] |
Jursinic, P.A. and Nelms, B.E.
(2003) A 2-D Diode Array and Analysis Software for Verification of
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Delivery. Medical Physics, 30,
870-879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1567831 |
| [13] |
Létourneau, D., Gulam, M., Yan,
D., Oldham, M. and Wong, J.W. (2004) Evaluation of a 2D Diode Array for
IMRT Quality Assurance. Radiology and Oncology, 70, 199-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2003.10.014 |
| [14] | Li, J.G., Yan, G. and Liu, C. (2009) Comparison of Two Commercial Detector Arrays for IMRT Quality Assurance. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 10, 2942. |
| [15] |
Chong, N.S., Lee, J.J.S., Kung,
W.-H., et al. (2011) Patient Delivery Quality Assurance for Linac-Based
IMRT and Helical Tomotherapy Using Solid State Detectors. Radiation
Measurements, 46, 1993-1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004 |
| [16] |
Xu, S., Xie, C., Ju, Z., Dai,
X., Gong, H., Wang, L. and Yang, J. (2010) Dose Verification of Helical
Tomotherapy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Using
2D-Array Ion Chambers. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 6,
e24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.2.e24 |
| [17] |
Li, G., Zhang, Y., Jiang, X.,
Bai, S., Peng, G., Wu, K. and Jiang, Q.F. (2013) Evaluation of the
ArcCHECK QA System for IMRT and VMAT Verification. Physica Medica:
European Journal of Medical Physics, 29, 295-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.04.005 |
| [18] | Feygelman, V., Zhang, G., Stevens, C. and Nelms, B.E. (2011) Evaluation of a New VMAT QA Device, or the “X” and “O” Array Geometries. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 12, 3346. |
| [19] | (2008) ArcCheckTM Reference Guide. Sun Nuclear Corporation. |
| [20] |
Depuydt, T., Van Esch, A. and
Huyskens, D.P. (2002) A Quantitative Evaluation of IMRT Dose
Distributions: Refinement and Clinical Assessment of the Gamma
Evaluation. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 62, 309-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00497-2 |
| [21] |
Ezzel, G.A., Burmeister, J.W.,
Dogan, N., et al. (2009) IMRT Commissioning: Multiple, Institution
Planning and Dosimetry Comparisons, a Report from AAPM Task Group 119.
Medical Physics, 36, 5359-5373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3238104 |
| [22] |
Fakir, H., Gaede, S., Mulligan,
M. and Chen, J.Z. (2012) Development of a Novel ArcCHECK Insert for
Routine Quality Assurance of VMAT Delivery Including Dose Calculation
with Inhomogeneities. Medical Physics, 39, 4203-4208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4728222 |
| [23] | Kim, J.I., Chung, J.B., Park, Y.K., et al. (2013) A Multi-Institutional Study for Tolerance and Action Levels of IMRT Dose Quality Assurance Measurements in Korea. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14, 3964. |
| [24] | Nelms, B.E., Chan, M.F., Jarry, G., Lemire, M., Lowden, J., Hampton, C. and Feygelman, V. (2013) Evaluating IMRT and VMAT Dose Accuracy: Practical Examples of Failure to Detect Systematic Errors When Applying a Commonly Used Metric and Action Levels. Medical Physics, 40, 111722. eww141020lx |
评论
发表评论