Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50210#.VDICzVfHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50210#.VDICzVfHRK0
Author(s)
Edgar M. Silva1,2, Pedro Maló1,2
The Internet-of-Things (IoT) is today one of the
hypes in the technological world but despite the enormous attention and
research investment, the clear business value is still hard to perceive.
IoT deployments are costly to be installed, managed and maintained, and
need to provide a very clear value to justify the investments. For
another viewpoint, IoT technologies need to be proven before deployment,
which implies the need to test and assess IoT solutions in real
settings and involve the actual target users. And as such, this presents
an opportunity to have IoT deployments with a clear business model
mainly focused on real-life large-scale research and technological
experimentation. This would mean having a sustainable IoT infrastructure
in-place based on the provision of experimentation services and a trial
environment to industry and research, which then could also present an
opportunity to establish added-value (business) services. This is the
exact idea of the flagship SmartSantander testbed facility and
especially its major deployment in the city of Santander, Spain. The
SmartSantander facility business model is built around
experimentally-driven research and technology development thus
attracting many experimenters from industry and European research
projects. This model makes it possible to sustain an outstanding
large-scale IoT deployment of around 12,000 sensors and on top of it the
development of new the development of new services and applications
especially targeting the needs of users (citizens, businesses,
authorities) in smart-cities. This paper studies the business model of
outstanding SmartSantander facility in order to provide a generic
Business Model for IoT testbeds that can provide guidance and be adapted
by owners (or owners to-be) wishing to exploit their IoT deployments as
facilities supporting experimentation and trials of IoT solutions.
KEYWORDS
Cite this paper
Silva, E. and Maló, P. (2014) IoT Testbed Business Model. Advances in Internet of Things, 4, 37-45. doi: 10.4236/ait.2014.44006.
| [1] | Maló, P., et al. (2013) Deliverable D3.1b Roadmaps for IoT Deployments, FP7-288315 PROBE-IT. Pursuing ROadmaps and BEnchmarks for the Internet of Things. |
| [2] |
Gluhak, A., Krco, S., Nati, M.,
Pfisterer, D., Mitton, N. and Razafindralambo, T. (2011) A Survey on
Facilities for Experimental Internet of Things Research. IEEE
Communications Magazine, 49, 58-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069710 |
| [3] | Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Richardson, J. and Allen, J. (2006) Is the Business Model a Useful Strategic Concept? Conceptual, Theoretical, and Empirical Insights. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17, 27-50. |
| [4] |
Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom,
R. (2002) The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from
Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology Spin-Off
Companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 529-555.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.529 |
| [5] |
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M. and
Allen, J. (2005) The Entrepreneur’s Business Model: Toward a Unified
Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 726-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001 |
| [6] |
Timmers, P. (1998) Business Models for Electronic Markets. Electronic Markets, 8, 3-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10196789800000016 |
| [7] | Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010) Business Model Generation. Self-Published, 281. |
| [8] |
Guinard, D., Trifa, V., Mattern,
F. and Wilde, E. (2011) From the Internet of Things to the Web of
Things: Resource-Oriented Architecture and Best Practices. Architecting
the Internet of Things, 97-129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19157-2_5 |
| [9] | Munoz, L., et al. (2011) Deliverable D1.1 First Cycle Architecture Specification, FP7-257992 SmartSantander. eww141006lx |
评论
发表评论