Read full paper at:
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50546#.VECR51fHRK0
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=50546#.VECR51fHRK0
Author(s)
1Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
3Department of Cancer Management and Research Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
4Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt.
2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
3Department of Cancer Management and Research Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
4Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to make a
comparison between measured and calculated physical wedge dose
distributions using the superposition algorithm. Settings and Design:
The accurate determination of absorbed dose is important radiotherapy
because of the relatively steep sigmoidal dose response curves for both
tumor control and normal-tissue damage. Materials and Methods:
High-energy photons (6 and 10 MV) from Artiste Treatment System Linear
Accelerator Machine, available at Alexandria Ayadi Al-Mostakbal Oncology
Center, were used. Results and Discussion: The results showed that the
difference between measured and calculated wedged isodose curves depends
on field size, beam energy, and the angle of the used wedge.
Conclusion: The results showed that the presence of a wedge alters the
primary and scattered components generated by a linear accelerator and
causes beam hardening in 6 and 10 MV. The beam hardening increased as
the wedge angle increased.
Cite this paper
Dawod, T. , Abdelrazek, E. , Elnaggar, M. and Omar,
R. (2014) Dose Validation of Physical Wedged Asymmetric Fields in
Artiste Linear Accelerator. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 3, 201-209. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2014.34026.
[1] |
de Oliveira, L.N., Carmen,
S.G.C., Fernanda, C. and de Adelaide, A. and de Almeida, C.E. (2009) 6
MV Wedge Photon Beam Profiles with the Fricke Xylenol Gel Dosimeter.
Brazilian Journal of Physics, 39, 615-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-97332009000600001 |
[2] |
Storchi, P. and Woudstra, E.
(1996) Calculation of the Absorbed Dose Distribution Due to Irregularly
Shaped Photon Beams Using Pencil Beam Kernels Derived from Basic Beam
Data. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 41, 637-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/41/4/005 |
[3] | Anjum, M.N., Qadir, A. and Afzal, M. (2008) Dosimetric Evaluation of a Treatment Planning System Using Pencil Beam Convolution Algorithm for Enhanced Dynamic Wedges with Symmetric and Asymmetric Fields. International Journal of Radiation Research, 5, 169-174. |
[4] |
Dai, J., Zhu, Y. and Wu, X.
(2001) Verification of the super omni wedge concept. Physics in Medicine
and Biology, 46, 2447-2455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/9/313 |
[5] | Huntzinger, C.J. (1992) Dynamic Wedge: A Physicist’s Perspective. Varian Dynamic Wedge Users’ Meeting Proceedings, Calagary, August 1992, 24. |
[6] |
Strunga, E. (1995) Physical
Parameters for Wedge Filter Used in Radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and
Oncology, 37, 59-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(96)80663-3 |
[7] | Dumitru, M., Rebegea, L., Praisler, M., Strunga, E. and Dumitrache, M. (2013) Issues in Radiotherapy Practice Due the Presence of Wedge Filters. Romanian Reports in Physics, 65, 456-467. |
[8] | Khan, F.M. (1994) The Physics of Radiation Therapy. 2nd Edition, Williams and Wilkins, London. |
[9] |
Leavitt, D.D., Martin, M.,
Moeller, J.H. and Lee, W.L. (1990) Dynamic Wedge Field Techniques
through Computer-Controlled Collimator Motion and Dose Delivery. Medical
Physics, 17, 87-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.596533 |
[10] |
Klein, E.E., Low, D.A.,
Meigooni, A.S. and Purdy, J.A. (1995) Dosimetry and Clinical
Implementation of Dynamic Wedge. International Journal of Radiation
Oncology*Biology*Physics, 31, 583-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00369-V |
[11] |
Leavitt, D.D. and Klein, E.
(1997) Dosimetry Measurement Tools for Commissioning Enhanced Dynamic
Wedge. Medical Dosimetry, 22, 171-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(97)00014-9 |
[12] |
Gibbons, J.P. (1998) Calculation
of Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Factors for Symmetric and Asymmetric Photon
Fields. Medical Physics, 25, 1411-1418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598313 |
[13] |
Prabhakar, R., Julka, P.K. and
Rath, G.K. (2008) Can Field in Field Technique Replace Wedge Filter in
Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: A Comparative Analysis in Various
Treatment Sites. Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in
Medicine, 31, 317-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03178601 |
[14] | Das, I.J., Cheng, C.-W., Watts, R.J., Ahnesjö, A., Gibbons, J., Li, X.A., et al. (2008) Accelerator Beam Data Commissioning Equipment and Procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Medical Physics, 35, 4186. |
[15] |
Keall, P., Zavgorodni, S.,
Schmidt, L. and Haskard, D. (1997) Improving Wedged Field Dose
Distributions. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 42, 2183-2192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/11/013 |
[16] | Myler, U. and Szabo, J.J. (2002) Dose Calculation along the Nonwedged Direction. Medical Physics, 29, 746-754. |
[17] | Breitman, K., Rathee, S., Newcomb, C., Murray, B., Robinson, D., Field, C., et al. (2007) Experimental Validation of the Eclipse AAA Algorithm. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 8, 76-92. |
[18] |
Miften, M.M., Beavis, A.W. and
Marks, L.B. (2002) The Influence of the Dose Calculation Model on
Treatment Plan Evaluation in Conformal Therapy: A Three Case Study.
Medical Dosimetry, 27, 51-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00088-2 |
[19] | Parker, W. and Patrocinio, H. (2005) Clinical Treatment Planning in External Photon Beam Radiotherapy. In: Podgorsak, E.B., Ed., Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 219. |
[20] |
Mayles, P., Nahum, A. and
Rosenwald, J.C. (2007) Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics: Theory and
Practice. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420012026 |
[21] |
Knöös, T. and Wittgren, L.
(1991) Which Depth Dose Data Should Be Used for Dose Planning When Wedge
Filters Are Used to Modify the Photon Beam? Physics in Medicine and
Biology, 36, 255-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/36/2/009 |
[22] |
Podgorsak, M.B., Kubsad, S.S.
and Paliwal, B.R. (1993) Dosimetry of Large Wedged High Energy Photon
Beams. Medical Physics, 20, 369-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597078 |
[23] |
Van Dyk, J., Barnett, R.,
Cygler, J. and Shragge, P. (1993) Commissioning and Quality Assurance of
Treatment Planning Computers. International Journal of Radiation
Oncology*Biology*Physics, 26, 261-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90206-B |
[24] |
Fraass, B., Doppke, K., Hunt,
M., Kutcher, G., Starkschall, G., Stern, R., et al. (1998) American
Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task
Group 53: Quality Assurance for Clinical Radiotherapy Treatment
Planning. Medical Physics, 25, 1773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.598373 |
[25] |
Venselaar, J. and Welleweerd, H.
(2001) Verification of Dose Calculations with a Treatment Planning
System for Open and Wedged Fields of a Cobalt-60 Unit with a New
Asymmetric Collimator. Medical Dosimetry, 26, 309-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0958-3947(01)00081-4 |
[26] | Caprile, P.F., Venencia, C.D. and Besa, P. (2007) Comparison between Measured and Calculated Dynamic Wedge Dose Distributions Using the Anisotropic Analytic Algorithm and Pencil Beam Convolution. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 8, 47-54. |
[27] | Maqbool, M., Muhammad, W., Shahid, M., Ahmad, M. and Matiullah, M. (2010) Accuracy Checks of Physical Beam Modifier Factors Algorithm Used in Computerized Treatment Planning System for a 15 MV Photon Beam. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 14, 214-220. |
[28] | Nath, R., et al. (1994) AAPM Code of Practice for Radiotherapy Accelerators. AAPM Report No. 47, American Institute of Physics, Woodbury. |
[29] | Pasquino, M., Casanova Borca, V., Tofani, S. and Ozzello, F. (2009) Verification of Varian Enhanced Dynamic Wedge Implementation in Masterplan Treatment Planning System. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2, 2867. |
[30] | Momennezhad, M., Bahreyni Toosi, M.T., Sadeghi, R., Gholamhoseinian, H. and Nasseri, Sh. (2010) A Monte Carlo Simulation and Dosimetric Verification of Physical Wedges Used in Radiation Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Research, 7, 223-227. eww141017lx |
评论
发表评论