The
qualitative evaluation of the central nervous system (CNS) using magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) has recently become possible owing to the introduction
of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This study aimed to examine whether the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) could
be increased by combining integrated slice-by-slice shimming (iShim) with a fat
suppression (FS) method other than short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) in
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and q-space imaging (qsi).
A cross-sectional study was conducted and 10 Japanese non-symptomatic
volunteers (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age, 33.5 [9.2] years; 8 males, 2
females) were included. All participants underwent
imaging of the cervical-upper thoracic spine. The authors acquired DWI images (b-values: 0 and nine steps from 400 to
10,000 s/mm2 for six axes) using a prototypical single-shot echo
planar imaging sequence by combining two types of shimming (3D Shim and iShim)
and two types of FS (STIR and water excitation [WE]) in 10 volunteers. In the
DWI study, the SNR for each b-value, FS effect in the b0 image, and distortion
in the added image (b0 - b10,000) were evaluated for the above-mentioned four
imaging methods. qsi involved original DWI images. In the qsi study, the SNR
was evaluated.
The results showed that with regard to both 3D Shim and iShim, the SNRs
were significantly higher when using WE than when using STIR in b0 - b900
images (p < 0.01). For 3D Shim, however, the SNR increase effect of WE
disappeared (p < 0.01) at b1600 or higher. For iShim, the SNR increase
effect of WE was maintained up to b3600 (p < 0.01). The FS effect of STIR
was superior to that of WE (p < 0.01). Although WE had a weak FS effect, its
FS effect was greater with iShim than with 3D Shim (p < 0.01). In added
images, with iShim, the spinal cord area became significantly smaller (p <
0.05), resulting in a less distorted image when compared with the 3D shim
image. On qsi, with regard to both 3D Shim and iShim, the SNRs were
significantly higher when using WE than when using STIR (3D Shim: p < 0.05;
iShim: p < 0.01). The SNR of iShim/WE was superior to that of 3D Shim/WE (p
< 0.05).
In conclusion, the combination of iShim and WE has a high SNR on qsi.
iShim might show improved clinical performance with regard to the detection of
suspicious lesions in the neck region.
Article by Yoshifumi
Sone, et al, from Japan and Germany.
Full access: http://mrw.so/4y8aGV
评论
发表评论